Literature DB >> 10429693

Outcome and cost comparison of percutaneous transluminal renal angioplasty, renal arterial stent placement, and renal arterial bypass grafting.

F Xue1, M A Bettmann, D R Langdon, W A Wivell.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To compare the outcomes and costs of percutaneous transluminal renal angioplasty (PTRA), percutaneous transluminal stent placement (PTSP) of renal arteries, and renal arterial bypass grafting (RABG) in treatment of renovascular hypertension.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Medical records and angiograms of 130 patients who underwent PTRA, PTSP, or RABG were retrospectively studied to determine success and complication rates, angiographic stenoses, blood pressures, antihypertensive medications, and serum creatinine levels. Actual costs were analyzed in detail.
RESULTS: Technical success rates for PTRA, PTSP, and RABG were 91%, 98%, and 92%, respectively. Complication rates were 13%, 16%, and 38%, respectively. The mean arterial pressure was initially lowered by 29.2 mm Hg, 30.3 mm Hg, and 27.3 mm Hg, respectively, and maintained at 21.0 mm Hg, 19.8 mm Hg, and 20.2 mm Hg below baseline at 12 months. The number of antihypertensive medications was initially reduced on average by 0.63, 0.72, and 0.58, respectively, but returned to baseline in all patients by 12 months. The serum creatinine level did not change substantially with any treatment. Initial treatment costs were $1,402, $2,573, and $15,393, respectively.
CONCLUSION: PTRA, PTSP, and RABG were equally efficacious for control of renovascular hypertension. The initial treatment cost for bypass grafting was substantially higher than that for PTRA and PTSP of renal arteries.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10429693     DOI: 10.1148/radiology.212.2.r99au20378

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiology        ISSN: 0033-8419            Impact factor:   11.105


  5 in total

1.  Cost analysis of procedures related to the management of renal artery stenosis from various perspectives.

Authors:  Debby van Helvoort-Postulart; Carmen D Dirksen; Abraham A Kroon; Patricia J Nelemans; Peter W de Leeuw; Alfons G H Kessels; Jos M A van Engelshoven; M G Myriam Hunink
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2005-07-05       Impact factor: 5.315

2.  Can patients with significant renal artery stenosis who underwent renal angioplasty be monitored postprocedure in the general ward instead of the high dependency unit?

Authors:  Ashish Sule; Dessmon Yh Tai; Tay Jam Chin; Pankaj Handa
Journal:  Int J Angiol       Date:  2008

3.  Successful stenting for renal artery stenosis in a patient with Alagille syndrome.

Authors:  Haruhiko Hirai; Yoko Santo; Shigetoyo Kogaki; Shunji Kurotobi; Yuri Etani; Sotaro Mushiake; Yoshiaki Nakatsuchi; Shigeo Nakajima; Keiichi Ozono
Journal:  Pediatr Nephrol       Date:  2005-03-17       Impact factor: 3.714

4.  The rise and fall of renal artery angioplasty and stenting in the United States, 1988-2009.

Authors:  Patric Liang; Rob Hurks; Rodney P Bensley; Allen Hamdan; Mark Wyers; Elliot Chaikof; Marc L Schermerhorn
Journal:  J Vasc Surg       Date:  2013-06-28       Impact factor: 4.268

Review 5.  Treatment of severe renal artery stenosis by percutaneous transluminal renal angioplasty and stent implantation: review of the pediatric experience: apropos of two cases.

Authors:  Kai König; Jutta Gellermann; Uwe Querfeld; Martin B E Schneider
Journal:  Pediatr Nephrol       Date:  2006-03-07       Impact factor: 3.714

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.