Literature DB >> 10428251

Collection devices for human papillomavirus.

D M Harper1, A Hildesheim, J L Cobb, M Greenberg, J Vaught, A T Lorincz.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Human papillomavirus (HPV) testing has relied to date on samples collected by experienced health professionals. Self-administered testing devices could allow HPV testing to occur in large-scale epidemiologic studies of primary care screening populations. The purpose of this study is to determine whether a self-collection device for cervicovaginal HPV infection could be developed.
METHODS: A prospective randomized trial of a consecutive sampling of 93 women, 18 years or older, receiving routine cervical cancer screening and colposcopy in the urban gynecologic clinics in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, were randomized into 2 arms. Women in arm 1 used a self-administered tampon before the physician-directed swabs of the cervix; in arm 2, women underwent the physician-directed swab testing before using the self-administered tampon. The concordance of HPV DNA positivity between sampling methods detected by a Hybrid Capture HPV tube test for both low- and high-risk types of HPV was the main outcome measure.
RESULTS: The concordance rate (ie, women whose cultures were classified as negative on both tests or positive on both tests) for arms 1 and 2 were similar: 78.3% and 80.9%, respectively.
CONCLUSIONS: The tampon was equivalent to the physician-directed swab in HPV detection and suggests its feasibility in long-term primary care studies of screening populations.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10428251

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Fam Pract        ISSN: 0094-3509            Impact factor:   0.493


  11 in total

1.  Is it feasible for women to perform their own Pap smears? A research question in progress.

Authors:  R E Martin
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2000-03-07       Impact factor: 8.262

2.  Self testing for human papillomaviruses.

Authors:  C S Herrington
Journal:  J Clin Pathol       Date:  2002-06       Impact factor: 3.411

3.  Diagnostic accuracy of self collected vaginal specimens for human papillomavirus compared to clinician collected human papillomavirus specimens: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  G S Ogilvie; D M Patrick; M Schulzer; J W Sellors; M Petric; K Chambers; R White; J M FitzGerald
Journal:  Sex Transm Infect       Date:  2005-06       Impact factor: 3.519

4.  Acceptability and usability of self-collected sampling for HPV testing among African-American women living in the Mississippi Delta.

Authors:  Isabel C Scarinci; Allison G Litton; Isabel C Garcés-Palacio; Edward E Partridge; Philip E Castle
Journal:  Womens Health Issues       Date:  2013-02-12

5.  Dry storage and transport of a cervicovaginal self-sample by use of the Evalyn Brush, providing reliable human papillomavirus detection combined with comfort for women.

Authors:  Romy van Baars; Remko P Bosgraaf; Bram W A ter Harmsel; Willem J G Melchers; Wim G V Quint; Ruud L M Bekkers
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2012-09-26       Impact factor: 5.948

6.  The Use of Urine and Self-obtained Vaginal Swabs for the Diagnosis of Sexually Transmitted Diseases.

Authors:  Charlotte A. Gaydos; Anne M. Rompalo
Journal:  Curr Infect Dis Rep       Date:  2002-04       Impact factor: 3.725

7.  Will New Human Papillomavirus Diagnostics Improve Cervical Cancer Control Efforts?

Authors:  Shalini L. Kulasingam; Laura A. Koutsky
Journal:  Curr Infect Dis Rep       Date:  2001-04       Impact factor: 3.725

8.  Factors affecting the detection rate of human papillomavirus.

Authors:  Diane M Harper; Meghan R Longacre; Walter W Noll; Dorothy R Belloni; Bernard F Cole
Journal:  Ann Fam Med       Date:  2003 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 5.166

9.  Human papillomavirus genotypes detected in clinician-collected and self-collected specimens from women living in the Mississippi Delta.

Authors:  Philip E Castle; Julia C Gage; Edward E Partridge; Alfio Rausa; Patti E Gravitt; Isabel C Scarinci
Journal:  BMC Infect Dis       Date:  2013-01-07       Impact factor: 3.090

10.  Intent to participate in future cervical cancer screenings is lower when satisfaction with the decision to be vaccinated is neutral.

Authors:  Natalie Marya Alexander; Diane Medved Harper; Johanna Claire Comes; Melissa Smith Smith; Melinda Ann Heutinck; Sandra Martin Handley; Debra Ann Ahern
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-06-10       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.