OBJECTIVE: The production of insulin-like growth factor binding protein-3 (IGFBP-3), the main IGF-I binding protein, is regulated by GH, and its serum levels are increased in acromegaly. We investigated its potential value as a parameter of acromegaly activity or remission in comparison with IGF-I, taking GH suppression below 2 microg/l after glucose load as the normal standard. METHODS: Data from 40 acromegalic patients (12 males and 28 females, aged 28 to 79 years) were obtained retrospectively from stored samples. From these, 145 pairs of IGF-I/IGFBP-3 values were collected; in 67 of them, simultaneous measurement of GH after glucose loading allowed their classification as active or inactive acromegaly. Relationships between IGF-I, IGFBP-3 and GH after glucose load were assessed, as well as differences between IGF-I and IGFBP-3 levels in active and inactive acromegaly. RESULTS: Significant positive correlation between IGF-I and IGFBP-3 in 145 samples was observed (r=0.49, P<0. 0001). As for the 67 samples in which activity or remission could be defined in terms of GH after glucose load, 50 were active and 17 inactive. Both IGF-I and IGFBP-3 significantly correlated with minimum GH (r=0.53, P<0.0001 and r=0.41, P<0.001 respectively). For both parameters, significant differences of means between active and inactive cases were observed (623+/-296 vs 300+/-108 ng/ml, P<0.0001 for IGF-I, and 4.1+/-1.3 vs 3.2+/-0.9 microg/ml, P<0.006 for IGFBP-3). Yet, when comparing in individual cases their classification as active or inactive with the finding of normal or increased IGF-I and IGFBP-3, among active cases 16% appeared as normal according to IGF-I, and 50% appeared as normal in terms of IGFBP-3. Among inactive cases, 23.5% appeared as active according to IGF-I, while 17.5% appeared as active in terms of IGFBP-3. CONCLUSION: Even though IGFBP-3 reflects GH secretion, it offers no advantage over IGF-I in the assessment of acromegaly, and it may underestimate disease activity in acromegalic patients.
OBJECTIVE: The production of insulin-like growth factor binding protein-3 (IGFBP-3), the main IGF-I binding protein, is regulated by GH, and its serum levels are increased in acromegaly. We investigated its potential value as a parameter of acromegaly activity or remission in comparison with IGF-I, taking GH suppression below 2 microg/l after glucose load as the normal standard. METHODS: Data from 40 acromegalicpatients (12 males and 28 females, aged 28 to 79 years) were obtained retrospectively from stored samples. From these, 145 pairs of IGF-I/IGFBP-3 values were collected; in 67 of them, simultaneous measurement of GH after glucose loading allowed their classification as active or inactive acromegaly. Relationships between IGF-I, IGFBP-3 and GH after glucose load were assessed, as well as differences between IGF-I and IGFBP-3 levels in active and inactive acromegaly. RESULTS: Significant positive correlation between IGF-I and IGFBP-3 in 145 samples was observed (r=0.49, P<0. 0001). As for the 67 samples in which activity or remission could be defined in terms of GH after glucose load, 50 were active and 17 inactive. Both IGF-I and IGFBP-3 significantly correlated with minimum GH (r=0.53, P<0.0001 and r=0.41, P<0.001 respectively). For both parameters, significant differences of means between active and inactive cases were observed (623+/-296 vs 300+/-108 ng/ml, P<0.0001 for IGF-I, and 4.1+/-1.3 vs 3.2+/-0.9 microg/ml, P<0.006 for IGFBP-3). Yet, when comparing in individual cases their classification as active or inactive with the finding of normal or increased IGF-I and IGFBP-3, among active cases 16% appeared as normal according to IGF-I, and 50% appeared as normal in terms of IGFBP-3. Among inactive cases, 23.5% appeared as active according to IGF-I, while 17.5% appeared as active in terms of IGFBP-3. CONCLUSION: Even though IGFBP-3 reflects GH secretion, it offers no advantage over IGF-I in the assessment of acromegaly, and it may underestimate disease activity in acromegalicpatients.
Authors: Mehdi Zeinalizadeh; Zohreh Habibi; Juan C Fernandez-Miranda; Paul A Gardner; Steven P Hodak; Sue M Challinor Journal: Pituitary Date: 2015-02 Impact factor: 4.107
Authors: Júnia R O L Schweizer; Katharina Schilbach; Michael Haenelt; Alexandre V Giannetti; Mariana F Bizzi; Beatriz S Soares; Eduardo Paulino; Jochen Schopohl; Sylvère Störmann; Antônio Ribeiro-Oliveira; Martin Bidlingmaier Journal: J Clin Endocrinol Metab Date: 2021-07-13 Impact factor: 5.958