OBJECTIVE: To create reliable reference ranges and calculate Z scores for fetal head ultrasound biometry using a large sample size which is evenly distributed from 12 to 42 weeks of pregnancy. DESIGN: A prospective, cross-sectional study. SETTING: Obstetric clinics (outpatient and delivery units) at the University Hospital of Zurich. SAMPLE: The study data were obtained from 6557 pregnant women. METHODS: Only the first ultrasound examination between 12 and 42 weeks of each fetus with exactly established gestational age was used for analysis. No exclusions were made on the grounds of small-for-date birthweight, prematurity or other events several weeks after the examination. Separate regression models were fitted to estimate the mean and standard deviation at each gestational age for each parameter. RESULTS: A total of 6217 fetal head biparietal diameters and 5510 occipito-frontal diameters were measured. Both head circumference and cephalic index were derived in 5462 cases where both biparietal diameter and occipito-frontal diameter could be measured on the same fetus. The centile charts, tables and regression formulae for biparietal and occipito-frontal diameters, head circumference and cephalic index are presented. An application to calculate Z scores was developed using Excel (Microsoft Corporation, USA) and macros are presented in detail in the Figure 8 footnote. The comparison of our charts with those of the two most recent studies revealed almost no differences in biparietal diameter centiles. In one publication, occipito-frontal diameter charts, and in another, head circumference charts were different from the current study. CONCLUSIONS: We have presented centile charts, tables and regression formulae for fetal head ultrasound biometry derived from a large and minimally selected sample size in a carefully designed cross-sectional study. Complete tables and regression formulae to calculate reference ranges and Z scores are presented for use in computer-aided evaluation of fetal ultrasound biometry.
OBJECTIVE: To create reliable reference ranges and calculate Z scores for fetal head ultrasound biometry using a large sample size which is evenly distributed from 12 to 42 weeks of pregnancy. DESIGN: A prospective, cross-sectional study. SETTING: Obstetric clinics (outpatient and delivery units) at the University Hospital of Zurich. SAMPLE: The study data were obtained from 6557 pregnant women. METHODS: Only the first ultrasound examination between 12 and 42 weeks of each fetus with exactly established gestational age was used for analysis. No exclusions were made on the grounds of small-for-date birthweight, prematurity or other events several weeks after the examination. Separate regression models were fitted to estimate the mean and standard deviation at each gestational age for each parameter. RESULTS: A total of 6217 fetal head biparietal diameters and 5510 occipito-frontal diameters were measured. Both head circumference and cephalic index were derived in 5462 cases where both biparietal diameter and occipito-frontal diameter could be measured on the same fetus. The centile charts, tables and regression formulae for biparietal and occipito-frontal diameters, head circumference and cephalic index are presented. An application to calculate Z scores was developed using Excel (Microsoft Corporation, USA) and macros are presented in detail in the Figure 8 footnote. The comparison of our charts with those of the two most recent studies revealed almost no differences in biparietal diameter centiles. In one publication, occipito-frontal diameter charts, and in another, head circumference charts were different from the current study. CONCLUSIONS: We have presented centile charts, tables and regression formulae for fetal head ultrasound biometry derived from a large and minimally selected sample size in a carefully designed cross-sectional study. Complete tables and regression formulae to calculate reference ranges and Z scores are presented for use in computer-aided evaluation of fetal ultrasound biometry.
Authors: E Katorza; E Bertucci; S Perlman; S Taschini; R Ber; Y Gilboa; V Mazza; R Achiron Journal: AJNR Am J Neuroradiol Date: 2016-03-31 Impact factor: 3.825
Authors: Doff B McElhinney; Carol B Benson; David W Brown; Louise E Wilkins-Haug; Audrey C Marshall; Linda Zaccagnini; Wayne Tworetzky Journal: Ultrasound Med Biol Date: 2010-01 Impact factor: 2.998
Authors: Caroline Marrs; Gayle Olson; George Saade; Gary Hankins; Tony Wen; Janak Patel; Scott Weaver Journal: Am J Perinatol Date: 2016-03-03 Impact factor: 1.862
Authors: R Cuzzilla; A J Spittle; K J Lee; S Rogerson; F M Cowan; L W Doyle; J L Y Cheong Journal: AJNR Am J Neuroradiol Date: 2018-05-17 Impact factor: 3.825
Authors: M J Rijken; E J H Mulder; A T Papageorghiou; S Thiptharakun; N Wah; T K Paw; S L M Dwell; G H A Visser; F H Nosten; R McGready Journal: Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol Date: 2012-08 Impact factor: 7.299