Literature DB >> 10426445

Identities of the Pseudomonas spp. in flora from chilled chicken.

I Arnaut-Rollier1, L De Zutter, J Van Hoof.   

Abstract

Nine broilers from each of two different broiler farms were collected at the slaughterhouse. Microbiological samples were collected from broiler chicken carcasses which were stored aerobically at 3+/-0.5 degrees C for 0, 3 or 8 days. By characterizing 40 colonies per broiler it was possible to evaluate the shift in psychrotrophic bacteria on the skin during cold storage. Most of these bacteria belong to the pseudomonads. The Shewan scheme was used in order to distinguish between four groups of pseudomonads. On fresh poultry group II pseudomonads were most abundantly represented, followed by group IV; group I and III strains were present in lower amounts. Non-fluorescing group II pseudomonads always predominated as spoilage became obvious (day 8). By including 36 reference strains, numerical analysis based on the simple matching coefficient was performed on 180 representatively selected strains. This revealed that Pseudomonas species indeed predominated when spoilage was obvious. Non-fluorescing species were identified mainly as P. fragi, but also as other strains belonging to P. fluorescens biovars A, B, C and F, P. lundensis and cluster 7 strains (unidentified). Microorganisms already substantially present on the fresh poultry were found in the highest numbers at the time of spoilage.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10426445     DOI: 10.1016/s0168-1605(99)00038-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Food Microbiol        ISSN: 0168-1605            Impact factor:   5.277


  9 in total

1.  Bacterial diversity analysis of Zhenjiang Yao meat during refrigerated and vacuum-packed storage by 454 pyrosequencing.

Authors:  Xiang Xiao; Ying Dong; Ying Zhu; Henglin Cui
Journal:  Curr Microbiol       Date:  2012-12-21       Impact factor: 2.188

Review 2.  N-acyl homoserine lactone molecules assisted quorum sensing: effects consequences and monitoring of bacteria talking in real life.

Authors:  Ömür Acet; Demet Erdönmez; Burcu Önal Acet; Mehmet Odabaşı
Journal:  Arch Microbiol       Date:  2021-05-18       Impact factor: 2.552

3.  Spoilage Bacteria Counts on Broiler Meat at Different Stages of Commercial Poultry Processing Plants That Use Peracetic Acid.

Authors:  Hudson T Thames; Courtney A Fancher; Mary G Colvin; Mika McAnally; Emily Tucker; Li Zhang; Aaron S Kiess; Thu T N Dinh; Anuraj T Sukumaran
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2022-06-02       Impact factor: 3.231

4.  Practical opportunities for microbiome analyses and bioinformatics in poultry processing.

Authors:  Steven C Ricke; Dana K Dittoe; Jessica A Brown; Dale R Thompson
Journal:  Poult Sci       Date:  2022-02-18       Impact factor: 4.014

Review 5.  Bacterial Contaminants of Poultry Meat: Sources, Species, and Dynamics.

Authors:  Amélie Rouger; Odile Tresse; Monique Zagorec
Journal:  Microorganisms       Date:  2017-08-25

6.  Food-borne bacterial pathogens in marketed raw meat of Dharan, eastern Nepal.

Authors:  Kamana Bantawa; Kalyan Rai; Dhiren Subba Limbu; Hemanta Khanal
Journal:  BMC Res Notes       Date:  2018-08-29

7.  The Psychrotrophic Pseudomonas lundensis, a Non-aeruginosa Pseudomonad, Has a Type III Secretion System of the Ysc Family, Which Is Transcriptionally Active at 37°C.

Authors:  Keerthikka Ravi; Nicole R Falkowski; Brittan S Scales; Volha D Akulava; Leonid N Valentovich; Gary B Huffnagle
Journal:  mBio       Date:  2022-02-22       Impact factor: 7.867

8.  Isolation and characterization of a T7-like lytic phage for Pseudomonas fluorescens.

Authors:  Sanna Sillankorva; Peter Neubauer; Joana Azeredo
Journal:  BMC Biotechnol       Date:  2008-10-27       Impact factor: 2.563

9.  Microbiome Profiles of Commercial Broilers Through Evisceration and Immersion Chilling During Poultry Slaughter and the Identification of Potential Indicator Microorganisms.

Authors:  John A Handley; Si Hong Park; Sun Ae Kim; Steven C Ricke
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2018-03-02       Impact factor: 5.640

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.