Literature DB >> 10426213

Contrast-enhanced MR angiography of the supra-aortic vessels in 24 seconds: a feasibility study.

S S Kollias1, C A Binkert, S Ruesch, A Valavanis.   

Abstract

A contrast-enhanced, gradient-echo 3D pulse sequence providing angiographic information in 24 s was tested in five healthy subjects and used prospectively in 21 patients for the investigation of the cervical arteries. Indications included suspected stenosis of the carotid (in 13), or vertebral arteries (in 1), carotid dissection (3), variants of the branches of the aortic arch (2) and extracranial carotid aneurysms (2). The results in all patients were compared with those of intra-arterial digital subtraction angiography (DSA). In patients with carotid stenosis, they were also compared with high-resolution 3D time-of-flight (TOF) MR angiography (MRA). Good quality MR angiograms of the neck vessels were obtained with the fast 3D sequence in 20 of the 21 patients. One claustrophobic patient was unable to cooperate. The degree of internal carotid artery (ICA) stenosis was graded correctly (compared to DSA) in 21 of 24 cases (87.5%). Two mild stenoses were overestimated as moderate using the fast MR sequence and one high-grade stenosis was misdiagnosed as a complete occlusion. Carotid dissection was confirmed in one case and correctly excluded in two. Four extracranial ICA aneurysms in two patients, arterial variants and stenosis of the origin of the vertebral artery were correctly diagnosed using the contrast-enhanced MR angiogram. Three-dimensional TOF MRA was unsuccessful due to motion artefacts in half of the cases of ICA stenosis.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10426213     DOI: 10.1007/s002340050772

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neuroradiology        ISSN: 0028-3940            Impact factor:   2.804


  8 in total

1.  Contrast-enhanced 3D MR angiography of the carotid artery: comparison with conventional digital subtraction angiography.

Authors:  Luca Remonda; Pascal Senn; Alain Barth; Marcel Arnold; Karl-Olof Lövblad; Gerhard Schroth
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2002-02       Impact factor: 3.825

2.  Prospective evaluation of carotid artery stenosis: elliptic centric contrast-enhanced MR angiography and spiral CT angiography compared with digital subtraction angiography.

Authors:  Juan Alvarez-Linera; Julián Benito-León; José Escribano; Jorge Campollo; Ricardo Gesto
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2003-05       Impact factor: 3.825

3.  Preoperative evaluation of carotid artery stenosis: comparison of contrast-enhanced MR angiography and duplex sonography with digital subtraction angiography.

Authors:  Ingitha Borisch; Markus Horn; Bernhard Butz; Niels Zorger; Bogdan Draganski; Thilo Hoelscher; Ulrich Bogdahn; Johann Link
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2003 Jun-Jul       Impact factor: 3.825

4.  Contrast-enhanced MR angiography of the carotid and vertebrobasilar circulations.

Authors:  Carina W Yang; James C Carr; Stephen F Futterer; Mark D Morasch; Benson P Yang; Stephanie M Shors; J Paul Finn
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2005-09       Impact factor: 3.825

5.  A previously unrecognized connection between occipital condyle fractures and internal carotid artery injuries (carotid and condyles).

Authors:  James Y Chen; Gregory Soares; Robert Lambiase; Timothy Murphy; Walter Biffl
Journal:  Emerg Radiol       Date:  2006-04-07

6.  Contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance angiography in stroke diagnostics: additional information compared with time-of-flight magnetic resonance angiography?

Authors:  K Alfke; U Jensen; C Pool; A Rohr; R Brüning; J Weber; T Bartsch; R Stingele; O Jansen
Journal:  Clin Neuroradiol       Date:  2010-11-26       Impact factor: 3.649

7.  Accuracy of contrast-enhanced MR angiography in predicting angiographic stenosis of the internal carotid artery: linear regression analysis.

Authors:  Gasser M Hathout; Michael J Duh; Suzie M El-Saden
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2003-10       Impact factor: 3.825

8.  Time-of-flight angiography: a viable alternative to contrast-enhanced MR angiography and fat-suppressed T1w images for the diagnosis of cervical artery dissection?

Authors:  E M Coppenrath; N Lummel; J Linn; O Lenz; M Habs; K Nikolaou; M F Reiser; M Dichgans; T Pfefferkorn; T Saam
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2013-06-04       Impact factor: 5.315

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.