Literature DB >> 10424810

Applications of comparative genomic hybridisation in constitutional chromosome studies.

C J Breen1, L Barton, A Carey, A Dunlop, M Glancy, K Hall, A M Hegarty, M T Khokhar, M Power, K Ryan, A J Green, R L Stallings.   

Abstract

G band cytogenetic analysis often leads to the discovery of unbalanced karyotypes that require further characterisation by molecular cytogenetic studies. In particular, G band analysis usually does not show the chromosomal origin of small marker chromosomes or of a small amount of extra material detected on otherwise normal chromosomes. Comparative genomic hybridisation (CGH) is one of several molecular approaches that can be applied to ascertain the origin of extra chromosomal material. CGH is also capable of detecting loss of material and thus is also applicable to confirming or further characterising subtle deletions. We have used comparative genomic hybridisation to analyse 19 constitutional chromosome abnormalities detected by G band analysis, including seven deletions, five supernumerary marker chromosomes, two interstitial duplications, and five chromosomes presenting with abnormal terminal banding patterns. CGH was successful in elucidating the origin of extra chromosomal material in 10 out of 11 non-mosaic cases, and permitted further characterisation of all of the deletions that could be detected by GTG banding. CGH appears to be a useful adjunct tool for either confirming deletions or defining their breakpoints and for determining the origin of extra chromosomal material, even in cases where abnormalities are judged to be subtle. We discuss internal quality control measures, such as the mismatching of test and reference DNA in order to assess the quality of the competitive hybridisation effect on the X chromosome.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10424810      PMCID: PMC1734415     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Med Genet        ISSN: 0022-2593            Impact factor:   6.318


  12 in total

1.  High-resolution mapping of human chromosome 11 by in situ hybridization with cosmid clones.

Authors:  P Lichter; C J Tang; K Call; G Hermanson; G A Evans; D Housman; D C Ward
Journal:  Science       Date:  1990-01-05       Impact factor: 47.728

2.  Karyotyping human chromosomes by combinatorial multi-fluor FISH.

Authors:  M R Speicher; S Gwyn Ballard; D C Ward
Journal:  Nat Genet       Date:  1996-04       Impact factor: 38.330

3.  Duplication of 8p23.1: a cytogenetic anomaly with no established clinical significance.

Authors:  J C Barber; C A Joyce; M N Collinson; J C Nicholson; L R Willatt; H M Dyson; M S Bateman; A J Green; J R Yates; N R Dennis
Journal:  J Med Genet       Date:  1998-06       Impact factor: 6.318

4.  Characterization of a de novo unbalanced chromosome rearrangement by comparative genomic hybridization and fluorescence in situ hybridization.

Authors:  B Levy; I F Gershin; R J Desnick; A Babu; B D Gelb; K Hirschhorn; P D Cotter
Journal:  Cytogenet Cell Genet       Date:  1997

5.  Comparative genomic hybridization in clinical cytogenetics.

Authors:  T Bryndorf; M Kirchhoff; H Rose; J Maahr; T Gerdes; R Karhu; A Kallioniemi; B Christensen; C Lundsteen; J Philip
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  1995-11       Impact factor: 11.025

6.  Peters' anomaly associated with partial deletion of the long arm of chromosome 11.

Authors:  J B Bateman; I H Maumenee; R S Sparkes
Journal:  Am J Ophthalmol       Date:  1984-01       Impact factor: 5.258

7.  Development and clinical application of an innovative fluorescence in situ hybridization technique which detects submicroscopic rearrangements involving telomeres.

Authors:  S J Knight; S W Horsley; R Regan; N M Lawrie; E J Maher; D L Cardy; J Flint; L Kearney
Journal:  Eur J Hum Genet       Date:  1997 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 4.246

Review 8.  Genome screening by comparative genomic hybridization.

Authors:  F Forozan; R Karhu; J Kononen; A Kallioniemi; O P Kallioniemi
Journal:  Trends Genet       Date:  1997-10       Impact factor: 11.639

9.  Inherited interstitial duplications of proximal 15q: genotype-phenotype correlations.

Authors:  C E Browne; N R Dennis; E Maher; F L Long; J C Nicholson; J Sillibourne; J C Barber
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  1997-12       Impact factor: 11.025

10.  The detection of subtelomeric chromosomal rearrangements in idiopathic mental retardation.

Authors:  J Flint; A O Wilkie; V J Buckle; R M Winter; A J Holland; H E McDermid
Journal:  Nat Genet       Date:  1995-02       Impact factor: 38.330

View more
  2 in total

1.  Recurrent genomic imbalances in primary effusion lymphomas.

Authors:  Prakash Nair; Hongyi Pan; Raymond L Stallings; Shou-Jiang Gao
Journal:  Cancer Genet Cytogenet       Date:  2006-12

Review 2.  Interstitial duplication of 20q11.22q13.11: A case report and review of literature.

Authors:  Logan Goetzinger; Rachel D Starks; Kyle Dillahunt; Heather Major; Jaime M Nagy; Alpa Sidhu
Journal:  Mol Genet Genomic Med       Date:  2021-07-16       Impact factor: 2.473

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.