OBJECTIVES: Since 1987 there has been an increase in tuberculosis notifications in the U.K., with this increase disproportionately affecting London. A recent national survey suggests that co-infection with HIV occurs in less than 5% of tuberculosis patients. This study asked if local co-infection rates in Inner London differed from the national results. METHODS: 157 consecutive patients starting antituberculous chemotherapy were venesected 2 weeks into treatment. Anonymized blood samples were screened for antibodies for HIV-1 and HIV-2 by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA). Epidemiological data were collected on each patient which was also coded before HIV test results were known. RESULTS: Of 157 patients commencing antituberculous therapy, 39 patients (24.8%) were found to be co-infected with HIV-1. HIV-negative and positive patients were similar in terms of age and sex. When 98 patients giving their country of origin as other than Europe were considered there were 22 co-infected with HIV (22.4%). Of the 39 HIV-positive identified in this study, 37 were also identified by our voluntary HIV testing programme. CONCLUSIONS: This study has shown that there may be very different rates of co-infection at a local level in the U.K. The local variation may be missed by national surveys and diverse local testing procedures. Anonymous testing identified only two patients with tuberculosis and HIV infection who were not identified by our voluntary HIV testing programme and this suggests that offering HIV tests to patients with tuberculosis is largely taken up by those at risk of HIV infection. Surveillance studies of this type are important in identifying marked local variation from the national pattern of HIV and Mycobacterium tuberculosis infection.
OBJECTIVES: Since 1987 there has been an increase in tuberculosis notifications in the U.K., with this increase disproportionately affecting London. A recent national survey suggests that co-infection with HIV occurs in less than 5% of tuberculosis patients. This study asked if local co-infection rates in Inner London differed from the national results. METHODS: 157 consecutive patients starting antituberculous chemotherapy were venesected 2 weeks into treatment. Anonymized blood samples were screened for antibodies for HIV-1 and HIV-2 by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA). Epidemiological data were collected on each patient which was also coded before HIV test results were known. RESULTS: Of 157 patients commencing antituberculous therapy, 39 patients (24.8%) were found to be co-infected with HIV-1. HIV-negative and positive patients were similar in terms of age and sex. When 98 patients giving their country of origin as other than Europe were considered there were 22 co-infected with HIV (22.4%). Of the 39 HIV-positive identified in this study, 37 were also identified by our voluntary HIV testing programme. CONCLUSIONS: This study has shown that there may be very different rates of co-infection at a local level in the U.K. The local variation may be missed by national surveys and diverse local testing procedures. Anonymous testing identified only two patients with tuberculosis and HIV infection who were not identified by our voluntary HIV testing programme and this suggests that offering HIV tests to patients with tuberculosis is largely taken up by those at risk of HIV infection. Surveillance studies of this type are important in identifying marked local variation from the national pattern of HIV and Mycobacterium tuberculosis infection.
Authors: H Maguire; J W Dale; T D McHugh; P D Butcher; S H Gillespie; A Costetsos; H Al-Ghusein; R Holland; A Dickens; L Marston; P Wilson; R Pitman; D Strachan; F A Drobniewski; D K Banerjee Journal: Thorax Date: 2002-07 Impact factor: 9.139