Literature DB >> 10424273

Sample size estimation for the sorcerer's apprentice. Guide for the uninitiated and intimidated.

J G Ray1, M J Vermeulen.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To review the importance of and practical application of sample size determination for clinical studies in the primary care setting. QUALITY OF EVIDENCE: A MEDLINE search was performed from January 1966 to January 1998 using the MeSH headings and text words "sample size," "sample estimation," and "study design." Article references, medical statistics texts, and university colleagues were also consulted for recommended resources. Citations that offered a clear and simple approach to sample size estimation were accepted, specifically those related to statistical analyses commonly applied in primary care research. MAIN MESSAGE: The chance of committing an alpha statistical error, or finding that there is a difference between two groups when there really is none, is usually set at 5%. The probability of finding no difference between two groups, when, in actuality, there is a difference, is commonly accepted at 20%, and is called the beta error. The power of a study, usually set at 80% (i.e., 1 minus beta), defines the probability that a true difference will be observed between two groups. Using these parameters, we provide examples for estimating the required sample size for comparing two means (t test), comparing event rates between two groups, calculating an odds ratio or a correlation coefficient, or performing a meta-analysis. Estimation of sample size needed before initiation of a study enables statistical power to be maximized and bias minimized, increasing the validity of the study.
CONCLUSION: Sample size estimation can be done by any novice researcher who wishes to maximize the quality of his or her study.

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10424273      PMCID: PMC2328387     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Can Fam Physician        ISSN: 0008-350X            Impact factor:   3.275


  19 in total

1.  Sixteen S-squared over D-squared: a relation for crude sample size estimates.

Authors:  R Lehr
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  1992-06-15       Impact factor: 2.373

2.  Indexes and boundaries for "quantitative significance" in statistical decisions.

Authors:  B Burnand; W N Kernan; A R Feinstein
Journal:  J Clin Epidemiol       Date:  1990       Impact factor: 6.437

3.  How many patients are necessary to assess test performance?

Authors:  C F Arkin; M S Wachtel
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1990-01-12       Impact factor: 56.272

4.  Indirect methods of assessing the effects of tobacco use in occupational studies.

Authors:  O Axelson; K Steenland
Journal:  Am J Ind Med       Date:  1988       Impact factor: 2.214

5.  Risky business: making sense of estimates of risk.

Authors:  D L Streiner
Journal:  Can J Psychiatry       Date:  1998-05       Impact factor: 4.356

6.  The importance of beta, the type II error and sample size in the design and interpretation of the randomized control trial. Survey of 71 "negative" trials.

Authors:  J A Freiman; T C Chalmers; H Smith; R R Kuebler
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1978-09-28       Impact factor: 91.245

7.  The fallacy of employing standardized regression coefficients and correlations as measures of effect.

Authors:  S Greenland; J J Schlesselman; M H Criqui
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  1986-02       Impact factor: 4.897

Review 8.  Beta-mimetics in preterm labour: an overview of the randomized controlled trials.

Authors:  J F King; A Grant; M J Keirse; I Chalmers
Journal:  Br J Obstet Gynaecol       Date:  1988-03

9.  Meta-analysis/Shmeta-analysis.

Authors:  S Shapiro
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  1994-11-01       Impact factor: 4.897

10.  Can meta-analysis be salvaged?

Authors:  S Greenland
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  1994-11-01       Impact factor: 4.897

View more
  2 in total

1.  On the trail of necrotizing fasciitis in children.

Authors:  J Ray
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2001-01-23       Impact factor: 8.262

2.  The Relationship Between Burnout and Occupational Stress in Genetic Counselors.

Authors:  Brittney Johnstone; Amy Kaiser; Marie C Injeyan; Karen Sappleton; David Chitayat; Derek Stephens; Cheryl Shuman
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2016-05-26       Impact factor: 2.537

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.