Literature DB >> 10423656

Metabolic and antihypertensive effects of nebivolol and atenolol in normometabolic patients with mild-to-moderate hypertension.

Y Pesant1, J Marc-Aurèle, P Bielmann, P Alaupovic, P Cartier, D Bichet, G Thibault, P J Lupien.   

Abstract

This was a double-blind, randomized, two-center, active-controlled, prospective, parallel study designed to evaluate the effects of nebivolol at daily doses of 5 mg on lipid and carbohydrate metabolism and on blood pressure in comparison with atenolol at daily doses of 50 mg. Normometabolic subjects with mild-to-moderate essential hypertension were recruited for this study, which included a 4-week, single-blind placebo washout phase and a 12-week double-blind treatment phase. After 12 weeks of treatment, both drugs demonstrated a significant decrease from baseline in high-density lipoprotein (HDL) apolipoprotein A-I (HDL-apoA-I) (nebivolol, P <.02; atenolol, P <.05). A significant reduction in HDL cholesterol (HDL-C) from baseline was also observed with nebivolol (P <.05). There were no significant differences between the drugs for these parameters, and the ratio low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C)-to-HDL-C did not change significantly after 12 weeks of active treatment with nebivolol or atenolol. There were no significant changes in total cholesterol, HDL (2) -C, HDL (3) -C, LDL-C, very-low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (VLDL-C), total triglycerides, HDL-triglycerides (TG), LDL-TG, VLDL-TG, total apoB, LDL-B, VLDL-B (including the ratio LDL-C-to-LDL-apoB), or Lp(a) during treatment with both drugs. No significant differences in plasma apoA-I and apoC-III as well as in apoA-I-, C-III-containing lipoprotein particles (including the apoC-III ratio) were observed between the drugs, neither before nor after each active treatment. There were no significant differences between the drugs or within each treatment group in plasma glucose, insulin, or C-peptide concentrations after a 2-hour oral glucose tolerance test. Mean clinic trough sitting systolic blood pressure (SBP)/diastolic blood pressure (DBP) significantly decreased from 150/98 mm Hg at baseline to 141/90 mm Hg at termination for nebivolol and from 160/99 mm Hg at baseline to 145/88 mm Hg at termination for atenolol. No significant between-treatment differences were observed for the mean clinic trough sitting SBP/DBP. Both drugs significantly increased the atrial natriuretic factor (ANF) N-terminal plasma levels, whereas no changes were observed in ANF C-terminal plasma concentrations. A significant decrease (P <. 05) in the plasma adrenocorticotropic hormone levels was observed after administration of both drugs. A significant decrease (P <.05) in plasma cortisol levels was observed only after atenolol treatment. The incidence of adverse events reported during nebivolol treatment was comparable to that observed during atenolol treatment. Heart rate was significantly reduced by both drugs. There were no significant changes in hematology, biochemistry, or urinalysis studies. Neither nebivolol nor atenolol adversely affected lipid or carbohydrate metabolism in normometabolic hypertensive patients. Both treatments demonstrated adequate and similar antihypertensive effects and were well tolerated.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10423656     DOI: 10.1097/00045391-199905000-00004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Ther        ISSN: 1075-2765            Impact factor:   2.688


  10 in total

Review 1.  The vasodilatory beta-blockers.

Authors:  Michala E Pedersen; John R Cockcroft
Journal:  Curr Hypertens Rep       Date:  2007-08       Impact factor: 5.369

2.  Beneficial effects of nebivolol in comparison with atenolol on safety and tolerability in essential hypertension.

Authors:  Vivek V Bhosale; S C Inamdar; Karande V B; Burute S R; Murthy M B; Ghatak A
Journal:  J Clin Diagn Res       Date:  2014-06-20

Review 3.  Nebivolol: a review of its use in the management of hypertension and chronic heart failure.

Authors:  Marit D Moen; Antona J Wagstaff
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 9.546

4.  Efficacy and Safety of Nebivolol and Rosuvastatin Combination Treatment in Patients with Concomitant Hypertension and Hyperlipidemia.

Authors:  Moo-Yong Rhee; Cheol Ho Kim; Youngkeun Ahn; Joon-Han Shin; Seung Hwan Han; Hyun-Jae Kang; Soon Jun Hong; Hae-Young Kim
Journal:  Drug Des Devel Ther       Date:  2020-11-17       Impact factor: 4.162

Review 5.  Differential Metabolic Effects of Beta-Blockers: an Updated Systematic Review of Nebivolol.

Authors:  Maria Marketou; Yashaswi Gupta; Shashank Jain; Panos Vardas
Journal:  Curr Hypertens Rep       Date:  2017-03       Impact factor: 5.369

6.  Updated meta-analytical approach to the efficacy of antihypertensive drugs in reducing blood pressure.

Authors:  J P Baguet; B Legallicier; P Auquier; S Robitail
Journal:  Clin Drug Investig       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 2.859

7.  Dyslipidemia induced by drugs used for the prevention and treatment of vascular diseases.

Authors:  Konstantinos Tziomalos; Vasilios G Athyros; Asterios Karagiannis; Dimitri P Mikhailidis
Journal:  Open Cardiovasc Med J       Date:  2011-02-24

8.  Individualization of antihypertensive drug treatment.

Authors:  Giuseppe Mancia; Guido Grassi
Journal:  Diabetes Care       Date:  2013-08       Impact factor: 19.112

9.  A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled parallel-group study to assess the efficacy and safety of nebivolol, a novel beta-blocker, in patients with mild to moderate hypertension.

Authors:  Robert J Weiss; Michael A Weber; Albert A Carr; Will A Sullivan
Journal:  J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich)       Date:  2007-09       Impact factor: 3.738

Review 10.  Nebivolol in the treatment of chronic heart failure.

Authors:  Angie Veverka; Jennifer L Salinas
Journal:  Vasc Health Risk Manag       Date:  2007
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.