Literature DB >> 10423624

Digit preferences observed in the measurement of blood pressure: repercussions on the success criteria in current treatment of hypertension.

L Alcocer1, G Novoa, D Sotres.   

Abstract

In a multicenter, open, noncomparative trial to assess the efficacy of an angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor, quinapril (Accupril; Parke-Davis), after 12 weeks of treatment in 667 adult patients 19-83 years of age with stage 1-3 hypertension, conducted by 85 physicians in primary health care, with systolic blood pressure (SBP) < 140 mm Hg and diastolic blood pressure (DBP) < 90 mm Hg as criteria for normalization, the efficacy of the drug was 75.1%. When an analysis was made of the frequency tables of BP recorded by the physicians in the case-report forms, a clear numerical preference was found in which the DBP was expressed in multiples of 5 in 81.3% of the cases and the SBP was expressed in multiples of 10 in 19% of the records, so that when a cutoff point <140/90 mm Hg is chosen in daily practice, 130/85 mm Hg is actually being selected. It suffices to change the criteria to accept as normal values less than or equal to instead of less than 140/90 mm Hg to increase the efficacy of the drug from 75.1% to 90.7% in our trial. Therefore, it is proposed to use multiples of 5 for DBP and multiples of 10 for SBP as cutoff points and the diffusion of clear recommendations on BP measurement.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1997        PMID: 10423624     DOI: 10.1097/00045391-199709000-00005

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Ther        ISSN: 1075-2765            Impact factor:   2.688


  3 in total

1.  Zero end-digit preference in recorded blood pressure and its impact on classification of patients for pharmacologic management in primary care - PREDICT-CVD-6.

Authors:  Joanna Broad; Sue Wells; Roger Marshall; Rod Jackson
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  2007-11       Impact factor: 5.386

2.  Digit Preference in Office Blood Pressure Measurements, United States 2015-2019.

Authors:  Kathryn E Foti; Lawrence J Appel; Kunihiro Matsushita; Josef Coresh; G Caleb Alexander; Elizabeth Selvin
Journal:  Am J Hypertens       Date:  2021-05-22       Impact factor: 2.689

3.  Manual or automated sphygmomanometer? A historical cohort to quantify measurement bias in blood pressure recording.

Authors:  Arash A Nargesi; Zaniar Ghazizadeh; Mehrdad Larry; Afsaneh Morteza; Firuzeh Heidari; Firuzeh Asgarani; Alireza Esteghamati; Kazem Mohammad; Manouchehr Nakhjavani
Journal:  J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich)       Date:  2014-09-08       Impact factor: 3.738

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.