Literature DB >> 10423054

Cost utility analysis of prophylactic pamidronate for the prevention of skeletal related events in patients with advanced breast cancer.

G Dranitsaris1, T Hsu.   

Abstract

Metastatic bone disease is a common complication of advanced breast cancer. Recently, the results of a large randomized placebo-controlled trial demonstrated that monthly pamidronate infusions reduce the incidence of skeletal related events in these patients. In the current study, a cost-utility analysis was performed from a Canadian health care system perspective to estimate the incremental cost-effectiveness of pamidronate in patients with advanced breast cancer. Twenty-five advanced breast cancer patients who were bisphosphonate naYve and had developed skeletal related complications were identified. Total hospital resource consumption was then collected for all patients. This included direct costs for hospitalization and costs for radiation treatment to bone, surgery, analgesics, blood products, diagnostic imaging, paramedical services and all related physician fees. Treatment preferences were estimated from a random sample of 25 women selected from the general population and 25 female health care professionals, using the Time Trade-Off technique. The outcomes were then generated through a decision-analytic model. Over a 12-month period, total costs in the pamidronate arm were approximately 44% higher than those in the no-treatment alternative (Can$ 9,180 vs Can$ 6,380). When treatment preferences were incorporated into the analysis, the results of the decision model revealed an incremental pamidronate cost of $18,700 per quality-adjusted life year gained. The results of the sensitivity analysis suggested that this estimate was dependent on the cost of treating skeletal related events, particularly bone surgery. Even though pamidronate has a high drug acquisition cost, the results of the cost-utility analysis suggest that this agent does provide patients with a substantial quality-adjusted survival benefit at a reasonable cost to the Canadian health care system.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10423054     DOI: 10.1007/s005200050260

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Support Care Cancer        ISSN: 0941-4355            Impact factor:   3.603


  16 in total

Review 1.  Ibandronic acid: a review of its use in the treatment of bone metastases of breast cancer.

Authors:  Paul L McCormack; Greg L Plosker
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 9.546

2.  Quality-of-life valuations of advanced breast cancer by New Zealand women.

Authors:  Richard J Milne; Kathy H Heaton-Brown; Paul Hansen; David Thomas; Vernon Harvey; Alison Cubitt
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 4.981

3.  Cost-Effectiveness of Treatments for the Management of Bone Metastases: A Systematic Literature Review.

Authors:  Lazaros Andronis; Ilias Goranitis; Sue Bayliss; Rui Duarte
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2018-03       Impact factor: 4.981

Review 4.  Pharmacoeconomics of bisphosphonates for skeletal-related event prevention in metastatic non-breast solid tumours.

Authors:  John A Carter; Avani D Joshi; Satyin Kaura; Marc F Botteman
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2012-05       Impact factor: 4.981

Review 5.  Advances in cancer pain management.

Authors:  F J McDonnell; J W Sloan; S R Hamann
Journal:  Curr Oncol Rep       Date:  2000-07       Impact factor: 5.075

Review 6.  Clinical and economic issues in the treatment of advanced breast cancer with bisphosphonates.

Authors:  Nicola Lucio Liberato; Monia Marchetti; Giovanni Barosi
Journal:  Drugs Aging       Date:  2003       Impact factor: 3.923

Review 7.  Zoledronic acid: a pharmacoeconomic review of its use in the management of bone metastases.

Authors:  Kate McKeage; Greg L Plosker
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 4.981

8.  Management of skeletal-related events in patients with advanced prostate cancer and bone metastases: Incorporating new agents into clinical practice.

Authors:  Alan So; Joseph Chin; Neil Fleshner; Fred Saad
Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J       Date:  2012-12       Impact factor: 1.862

9.  Cost analysis of secondary prophylaxis with oral clodronate versus pamidronate in metastatic breast cancer patients.

Authors:  Dorothy Romanus; Neill Iscoe; Carlo Deangelis; Neil Shear; Thomas R Einarson
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2004-07-03       Impact factor: 3.603

10.  Cost-effectiveness of zoledronic acid compared with clodronate in multiple myeloma.

Authors:  T E Delea; K El Ouagari; J Rotter; A Wang; S Kaura; G J Morgan
Journal:  Curr Oncol       Date:  2012-12       Impact factor: 3.677

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.