Literature DB >> 10420722

[The German Cardiovascular Disease Prevention Study: social gradient in use of drugs with a potentially addictive nature. An analysis of selected indications groups].

J Breckenkamp1, U Laaser.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Not only prescription but also turnover of medicines are well established by documentary evidence. However, there is a lack of information regarding the usage of drugs in different social classes.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Within the scope of the German Cardiovascular Prevention Study (GCP), a cross-sectional community-based multicenter intervention study, (t0 = 1984/5, t1 = 1988 und t2 = 1991/2) the usage of drugs was examined. Four groups of drugs with a potentially addictive character (analgesics, sedatives, sleeping drugs, psychotropics) were analyzed with regard to socioeconomic differences in consumption.
RESULTS: A gradient was found for all analyzed groups of drugs. The data analysis of the 3 pooled surveys (t0, t1, t2) regarding analgesics yields an OR of 1.67 (95%-CI: 1.41 to 1.98) for the middle class (mc) and 2.33 (95%-CI: 1.95 to 2.80) for the lower class (lc) (reference being the upper class). For psychotropics the values are OR = 1.40 (95%-CI: 1.12 to 1.75) (mc) and OR = 2.01 (95%-CI: 1.58 to 2.55) (lc), for sleeping drugs OR = 1.31 (95%-CI: 1.05 to 1.65) (mc) and OR = 1.54 (95%-CI: 1.37 to 1.96) (lc) and for sedatives OR = 1.40 (95%-CI: 1.19 to 1.64) (mc) and OR = 1.94 (95%-CI: 1.63 to 2.30) (lc).
CONCLUSION: Considering possible indicators of different drug utilization (age, sex, occupation, individual health, last medical care, mental distress) the gradient was diminished but--especially for the lower class--remained at significant OR's between 1.37 and 1.65.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10420722     DOI: 10.1007/bf03044889

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Klin (Munich)        ISSN: 0723-5003


  9 in total

Review 1.  The Black report on socioeconomic inequalities in health 10 years on.

Authors:  G D Smith; M Bartley; D Blane
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1990 Aug 18-25

2.  [Social class and risk factors for coronary heart disease--results of the Regional DHP(German Cardiovascular Prevention) Health Surveys].

Authors:  U Helmert; E Greiser
Journal:  Soz Praventivmed       Date:  1988

3.  Inequalities in death--specific explanations of a general pattern?

Authors:  M G Marmot; M J Shipley; G Rose
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1984-05-05       Impact factor: 79.321

4.  [Prevalence and sociodemographic correlates of benzodiazepine utilization in an urban population].

Authors:  G Pakesch; H Katschnig; R Dittrich; N Loimer; E Rasinger; G Tutsch
Journal:  Nervenarzt       Date:  1993-05       Impact factor: 1.214

Review 5.  Socioeconomic factors and cardiovascular disease: a review of the literature.

Authors:  G A Kaplan; J E Keil
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  1993-10       Impact factor: 29.690

6.  Socioeconomic status and risk of cancer, cerebral stroke, and death due to coronary heart disease and any disease: a longitudinal study in eastern Finland.

Authors:  J T Salonen
Journal:  J Epidemiol Community Health       Date:  1982-12       Impact factor: 3.710

7.  Side-effect 'tolerance' in elderly long-term recipients of benzodiazepine hypnotics.

Authors:  C G Swift; M R Swift; J Hamley; I H Stevenson; J Crooks
Journal:  Age Ageing       Date:  1984-11       Impact factor: 10.668

8.  Pattern of drug use in a general population--prevalence and predicting factors: the Tromsø study.

Authors:  A E Eggen
Journal:  Int J Epidemiol       Date:  1994-12       Impact factor: 7.196

9.  Epidemiological approach to the explanation of social differentiation in mortality: the Whitehall studies.

Authors:  M Marmot
Journal:  Soz Praventivmed       Date:  1993
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.