Literature DB >> 10418901

Derivation of attenuated porcine epidemic diarrhea virus (PEDV) as vaccine candidate.

C H Kweon1, B J Kwon, J G Lee, G O Kwon, Y B Kang.   

Abstract

The field isolate of porcine epidemic diarrhea virus (PEDV) was serially passaged in Vero cells. The cell passaged PEDV, designated KPEDV-9, was tested for its pathogenicity in the neonatal pigs, immunogenicity and safety in the pregnant sows. The result indicated that KPEDV-9 at the 93rd passage revealed reduced pathogenicity in the neonatal pigs. Pregnant sows inoculated with the attenuated virus showed increased immune responses by ELISA. In addition, delivered piglets were protected from challenge of wild type PEDV. The safety test in pregnant sows indicated that all inoculated animals farrowed the average numbers of litters of piglets. The results of this study supported that the attenuated virus derived from serial passage could be applied as vaccine for protecting suckling piglets against PEDV infection.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10418901      PMCID: PMC7125954          DOI: 10.1016/s0264-410x(99)00059-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Vaccine        ISSN: 0264-410X            Impact factor:   3.641


Introduction

Porcine epidemic diarrhea virus (PEDV), a member of Coronaviridae, is the etiological agent of entero-pathogenic diarrhea in swine [1], [2], [3]. Although the clinical symptoms of PEDV infection are similar to transmissible gastroenteritis virus (TGEV) infection, PEDV has a wider variety of clinical signs in pigs [4]. Propagation of PEDV in vitro was rather limited until Vero cells were found to support the growth of virus in the presence of trypsin [5]. In this study, we described the derivation of an attenuated strain of PEDV, as a potential vaccine candidate, through cell adaptation.

Materials and methods

Cell and virus

Vero cells obtained from ATCC (Vero C1008) were regularly maintained in alpha-MEM supplemented with 5% fetal bovine serum, penicillin (100 unit/ml), streptomycin (100 unit/ml) and amphotericin (0.25 g/ml). The isolate of PEDV was originated from a neonatal pig and plaque purified in Vero cells. The isolate, designated KPEDV-9, was passaged in 80–90% monolayers of Vero cells in alpha-MEM with 0.02% yeast extract, 0.3% tryptose phosphate broth (TPB) and 1–2 μg of trypsin as described [5], [6]. Sequential passages of the virus were normally conducted in roller culture. Each passage level of virus was stored at −70°C or freeze-dried with equal volume of stabilizer (0.217 M Lactose, 0.0038 M KHPO4, 0.0072 M K2HPO4, 0.0049 M monosodium glutamate, 1% Gelatin). The final stock of the PEDV was characterized in two ways. Firstly, the culture supernatant was subjected to direct centrifugation at 60,000×g for 2 h and the pellet was resuspended to 1/200 of initial volume for morphological identification by transmission electron microscopy. Secondly, the virus infected cells were subjected to reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) to detect specific PEDV sequences. Three primers for RT-PCR were selected from the sequences information of membrane protein (M) gene of Duarte et al. [7]. P1 (27mer); 5′–CCCCAGTACTGTTATTGACGTATAAAC–3′ (position 974–1000), P2 (24mer); 5′–GTTTAGACTAAATGAAGCACTTTC–3′ (position 1665–1688) for PCR and P3 (25mer); 5′–GCCATAAAGTTTCTGTTTAGACTAA–3′ (1702–1678) as the primer for synthesis of complementary DNA, respectively. The extraction of RNA and RT-PCR were conducted according to the instructions of commercially available kit (Stratagene). PCR reactions were performed in the conditions as described previously [8]. After amplification, the PCR products were cloned into pUC19 vector for sequencing using Sequenase version 2.0 (USB, USA). In addition, the presence of adventitious virus such as porcine parvovirus (PPV), Japanese encephalitis virus (JEV), Hog cholera virus (HCV) and other cythopathogenic viruses were examined as described previously [9], [10], [11].

Examination on attenuation of cell passaged PEDV

For the detection of attenuation, viral stocks at 90 passages were tested in 4 days old piglets. From 106.0 TCID50/ml to 108.0 TCID50/ml of cell adapted PEDV was inoculated into suckling piglets intramuscularly or through the oral route. In order to compare the pathogenicity, PEDV isolate before cell adaptation was prepared from the small intestines of neonatal piglet. The intestine was ground in phosphate buffered saline (PBS, pH 7.4). The 10% suspension was then filtered using a 0.2-μm membrane filter (Acrodisk, Gelman) and further diluted to 5-, 10- and 20-fold in PBS. Four groups of five piglets were orally fed with the suspensions of diluted stock of intestine. The animals were observed for clinical symptoms of diarrhea and mortality in the inoculated animals was observed for 10 days.

Immunogenicity of attenuated virus

Three pregnant sows 4–5 weeks prior to farrowing were tested for the detection of immune responses. Pigs were inoculated intramuscularly with the attenuated viruses at the titer of at 107.0 TCID50/ml. Two pregnant sows remained as uninoculated control. After two weeks, second inoculations of same titer were followed. Each paired serum before and after inoculation was collected at two-week interval. The collected sera and colostrum at delivery were tested for the presence of antibodies by ELISA. After delivery, suckling piglets of 2 days old were orally challenged with 10 or 5 LD50 of wild PEDV. The clinical signs of diarrhea and mortality of challenged piglets were observed for two weeks.

ELISA

For the preparation of antigen, the cell adapted PEDV was concentrated with polyethylene glycol (PEG, MW 6000) as described [12]. The PEG treated viral solution was then precipitated and resuspended at 1/10th of original volume with TEN buffer (0.01 M Tris, 0.001 M EDTA, 0.1 M NaCl, pH 7.4). The purified virus was then used for the ELISA. The procedures for ELISA were basically the same with a previous study [13]. Briefly, the dilution of antigen and second antibodies were adjusted to the optical density (OD) around 0.2 (A 490) using the negative porcine sera. Usually each well in 96-well microplate (Costar) was coated with 1–2 μg of protein in 50 mM carbonate buffer (pH 9.6) at 5°C overnight, followed by the blocking with 1% skim milk at 37°C. The 1/400 diluted porcine sera in PBS with 0.01% Bovine serum albumin (BSA) and 0.05% Tween 20 (PBST) were reacted at 37°C for 30 min and then washed extensively with PBST three times at 5-min intervals. The reacted plate was washed again at the same condition and incubated with 2000-fold diluted horseradish peroxidase (HRP) labelled anti-porcine IgG (KPL) for 1 h at 37°C. The plate was developed in O-phenylenediamine (OPD) at room temperature for 20 min. The reaction was stopped with 2 M H2SO4 before measuring OD at 490 nm.

Safety experiment in pregnant sows

A total of 63 pregnant sows were inoculated intramuscularly with 1 ml of the virus containing 107.0 TCID50/ml. Twenty-three pregnant sows received one injection 3–4 weeks prior to farrowing. In another farm, 40 pregnant sows received two injections at 2–3-week intervals before farrowing. The average number of the litters were compared with the data of uninoculated pregnant sows at the corresponding farm during same period of time.

Nucleotide sequence accession numbers

The sequence accession number for M protein of attenuated KPEDV-9 is GeneBank accession number AFO15888.

Results

Derivation of high passage level of PEDV in Vero cell culture

The PEDV was continuously passaged in Vero cells. Sequential passage of virus regularly conducted every 4–5 days postinfection in cells. The supernatant was harvested and used for next inoculation in Vero cells up to 93 passages. However, cytopathogenic effect (CPE) in Vero cells was not so clear that the culture supernatant of virus infected cell was subjected to morphological and genetic characterization. When the culture supernatant of virus infected cell was examined by the transmission electron microscopy, characteristic shape of coronavirus with diameter of 100–150 nm was possible to identify ( Fig. 1). In addition, the comparision of M gene of cell passaged virus showed the 98.97% in nucleotide and 98.24% in amino acid identity with previously reported PEDV strain ( Fig. 2). No adventitious viral contaminations were detected in the final stock of PEDV.
Fig. 1

Transmission electron microscopy of cell adapted KPEDV-9 strain after staining with 2% uranyl acetate. Bar represents 100 nm.

Fig. 2

Detection of PEDV M fragment identified by RT-PCR. (a) Diagram of PEDV genome according to Duarte et al. The sites for PCR primers (P1 and P2) with the directions of the extension and cDNA synthesis (P3). Nucleotide sequence of cDNA corresponding M gene of PEDV. (b) Sequence and amino acid comparison between B: Br1/87 [7] and V: cell adapted KPEDV-9 strain, respectively. Difference of nucleotide and amino acid are indicated.

Transmission electron microscopy of cell adapted KPEDV-9 strain after staining with 2% uranyl acetate. Bar represents 100 nm. Detection of PEDV M fragment identified by RT-PCR. (a) Diagram of PEDV genome according to Duarte et al. The sites for PCR primers (P1 and P2) with the directions of the extension and cDNA synthesis (P3). Nucleotide sequence of cDNA corresponding M gene of PEDV. (b) Sequence and amino acid comparison between B: Br1/87 [7] and V: cell adapted KPEDV-9 strain, respectively. Difference of nucleotide and amino acid are indicated.

Pathogenicity of cell attenuated PEDV

The pathogenicity of attenuated virus was tested in the 1-day-old piglets before taking colostrum. Six separate litters of 53 piglets and 15 litters of 111 piglets were inoculated intramuscularly with virus of 107.0 and 106.0 TCID50/ml, respectively. In this experiment, all the inoculated piglets failed to show signs of diarrhea and symptoms related to PEDV infection. In order to avoid any possible effects from the maternal immunity through the colostrum and detect the potential pathogenicity of the attenuated virus, eight piglets of 4 days old were infected orally with 10 ml of virus stock, which contained virus of 108.0 TCID50/ml, and were artificially fed with dairy milk. Although three piglets showed signs of anorexia and mild signs of diarrhea in two or three days after inoculation, nevertheless, the signs seemed to be transient. In fact, all piglets recovered in the next 2–3 days. However, in the groups of piglets fed with wild virus before cell passages, all the piglets developed symptoms of watery diarrhea in 2–3 days, and the mortality reached up to 10–100%, depending on the dilution of virus within one week as shown in Table 1.
Table 1

Comparison of attenuated virus and wild virus in new-born piglets

VirusAge (days)No. of pigletsInoculation
Clinical signsc and No. of death
dosesa (TCID50/ml)routeb
Cell attenuated48108.0O−/+, 0/8
1d53107.0IM−, 0/53
1111106.0IM−, 0/111



Wild typee4510%O+, 5/5
451%O+, 5/5
450.5%O+, 1/5

1 ml.

O means oral and IM intramuscular, respectively.

− means no signs of diarrhea, −/+ signs of mild diarrhea and + diffuse diarrhea.

Inoculation before taking the colostrum.

Ground intestines of piglets before cell adaptation.

Comparison of attenuated virus and wild virus in new-born piglets 1 ml. O means oral and IM intramuscular, respectively. − means no signs of diarrhea, −/+ signs of mild diarrhea and + diffuse diarrhea. Inoculation before taking the colostrum. Ground intestines of piglets before cell adaptation. When the collected sera were tested for the presence of the antibodies by ELISA, all inoculated sows showed the rising ELISA titers ( Fig. 3). On the other hands, the antibody titers of control pigs decreased at the time of delivery. In addition, colostrum at delivery showed higher or similar level of antibodies of corresponding sows. After challenge exposures mortality of piglets were compared with uninoculated control. Although the mortality of piglets after challenge with 10 LD50 of wild PEDV was reduced to 20% compared to 100% in control litter, all piglets survived in the litters after challenge experiment with 5 LD50 of virus compared to 60% in control ( Table 2). However, mild signs of diarrhea were also detected in one litter of piglets 2 days after challenge, but they recovered the next day.
Fig. 3

Immune responses of pregnant sows inoculated with cell attenuated KPEDV-9 strain. Animals were inoculated twice at 2-week intervals and serum samples were tested by ELISA.

Table 2

Survival of piglets from attenuated KPEDV-9 vaccinated sows (V) and unvaccinated control (C) after challenge exposure

TreatmentDose of challenge (LD50)No. of survival/pigletsa
C100/10
V-1102/10
C54/10
V-258/8
V-357/7

One week after challenge exposure.

Immune responses of pregnant sows inoculated with cell attenuated KPEDV-9 strain. Animals were inoculated twice at 2-week intervals and serum samples were tested by ELISA. Survival of piglets from attenuated KPEDV-9 vaccinated sows (V) and unvaccinated control (C) after challenge exposure One week after challenge exposure.

Safety experiment of attenuated PEDV on pregnant sow

The safety test of the attenuated virus in pregnant sow was conducted in two separate farms. One farm has not had any history of epidemic diarrhea in last few years and another farm had the experience of PEDV outbreak in the previous year. A total of 63 pregnant sows were inoculated once or twice before farrowing. As shown in Table 3, all the inoculated sows farrowed the same average numbers of litters of uninoculated control group without any clinical problems.
Table 3

Farrowing data in pregnant sows inoculated with attenuated KPEDV-9 strain

FarmNo. of inoculation (107.0 TCID50/ml)RouteaNo. of pregnant sows (Mean No. of litters)
controlinoculated
A1b (1 ml)IM28 (8.0)23 (8.0)
B2c (1 ml)IM40 (10.7)40 (10.7)

Intramuscular.

2–3 weeks before farrowing.

4–5 weeks and 2–3 weeks before farrowing, respectively.

Farrowing data in pregnant sows inoculated with attenuated KPEDV-9 strain Intramuscular. 2–3 weeks before farrowing. 4–5 weeks and 2–3 weeks before farrowing, respectively.

Discussion

In this study, we investigated the attenuation of PEDV through serial passages in Vero cell cultures and its prophylactic effect in pregnant sows. After serial passages in Vero cells, the growth of virus was rather trypsin-independent and the detection of cytopathic effect (CPE) was rather variable, depending on clones of Vero cell lines (data not presented here). Since the SPF or gnotobiotic piglets were not used in this experiment, it might not reasonable to figure out the exact differences in pathogenicity between the wild and the attenuated virus. Nevertheless, when compared with the wild PEDV, the animals inoculated with the high passage level of virus did not show any severe signs of diarrhea or death in piglets, supporting attenuation. It is known that PEDV replicates mainly in the villi of small intestines [14]. Like attenuated TGEV, the replication of attenuated PEDV may be limited to the small portion of intestine with short duration of secretion compared to virulent virus [15]. In fact, the detection of signs of diarrhea from piglets inoculated orally with attenuated virus delayed at least by two days and lasted one day compared with the signs from piglets inoculated with wild virus. When we tested the immunoprophylactic effect in pregnant sows, it was demonstrated that the vaccinated swine resulted in reduced piglet mortality after challenge experiment (20–100% in vaccinates compared with 0–40% in controls), indicating that the attenuated PEDV could induce the status of immunity in pregnant pigs, providing protection in piglets like other enteric disease in swine. Previously, we found that PEDV infections were related to more than 20% of diarrheal cases in the neonatal pigs, thus causing a considerable losses in pig industry [13]. In fact, field application of attenuated virus as vaccine resulted in the overall reduction of mortality of neonatal pigs (2–52% compared with before vaccination) in the farms having PEDV outbreak [16]. Nevertheless, it is worthy to note that the efficacy of protection was rather complicated and conflicting according to the challenge dose like other enteric diseases. Although the pregnant pigs inoculated with attenuated virus showed the increased immune status by ELISA as compared to uninoculated control, it is difficult to explain the exact relation to mucosal immunity for protection. Since it was well confirmed that the mechanisms of the passive immunity are extensively related to the presence of IgA and IgM antibodies [17], further experiments, including detection of antibody secreting cells of IgA and IgM, may give the practical information for immunoprophylaxis against PEDV.
  13 in total

1.  Procedures for identification of arthropod-borne viruses.

Authors:  J CASALS
Journal:  Bull World Health Organ       Date:  1961       Impact factor: 9.408

2.  A new in vitro method (END) for detection and measurement of hog cholera virus and its antibody by means of effect of HC virus on Newcastle disease virus in swine tissue culture. I. Establishment of standard procedure.

Authors:  T KUMAGAI; T SHIMIZU; S IKEDA; M MATUMOTO
Journal:  J Immunol       Date:  1961-09       Impact factor: 5.422

3.  An apparently new syndrome of porcine epidemic diarrhoea.

Authors:  E N Wood
Journal:  Vet Rec       Date:  1977-03-19       Impact factor: 2.695

4.  Rapid diagnosis of porcine epidemic diarrhea virus infection by polymerase chain reaction.

Authors:  C H Kweon; J G Lee; M G Han; Y B Kang
Journal:  J Vet Med Sci       Date:  1997-03       Impact factor: 1.267

5.  Sequence analysis of the porcine epidemic diarrhea virus genome between the nucleocapsid and spike protein genes reveals a polymorphic ORF.

Authors:  M Duarte; K Tobler; A Bridgen; D Rasschaert; M Ackermann; H Laude
Journal:  Virology       Date:  1994-02       Impact factor: 3.616

6.  Use of two enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays to monitor antibody responses in swine with experimentally induced infection with porcine epidemic diarrhea virus.

Authors:  A P van Nieuwstadt; T Zetstra
Journal:  Am J Vet Res       Date:  1991-07       Impact factor: 1.156

7.  Experimental infection of pigs with a new porcine enteric coronavirus, CV 777.

Authors:  P Debouck; M Pensaert
Journal:  Am J Vet Res       Date:  1980-02       Impact factor: 1.156

8.  Porcine epidemic diarrhoea virus as a cause of persistent diarrhoea in a herd of breeding and finishing pigs.

Authors:  A Pijpers; A P van Nieuwstadt; C Terpstra; J H Verheijden
Journal:  Vet Rec       Date:  1993-02-06       Impact factor: 2.695

9.  Comparison of two methods for detection of transmissible gastroenteritis virus in feces of pigs with experimentally induced infection.

Authors:  A P van Nieuwstadt; J B Cornelissen; T Zetstra
Journal:  Am J Vet Res       Date:  1988-11       Impact factor: 1.156

10.  Isolation and serial propagation of porcine epidemic diarrhea virus in cell cultures and partial characterization of the isolate.

Authors:  K Kusanagi; H Kuwahara; T Katoh; T Nunoya; Y Ishikawa; T Samejima; M Tajima
Journal:  J Vet Med Sci       Date:  1992-04       Impact factor: 1.267

View more
  52 in total

1.  Sequence analysis of the partial spike glycoprotein gene of porcine epidemic diarrhea viruses isolated in Korea.

Authors:  Seong-Jun Park; Hyoung-Joon Moon; Jeong-Sun Yang; Chul-Seung Lee; Dae-Sub Song; Bo-Kyu Kang; Bong-Kyun Park
Journal:  Virus Genes       Date:  2007-04-11       Impact factor: 2.332

2.  Proteolytic activation of the porcine epidemic diarrhea coronavirus spike fusion protein by trypsin in cell culture.

Authors:  Oliver Wicht; Wentao Li; Lione Willems; Tom J Meuleman; Richard W Wubbolts; Frank J M van Kuppeveld; Peter J M Rottier; Berend Jan Bosch
Journal:  J Virol       Date:  2014-05-07       Impact factor: 5.103

Review 3.  Porcine epidemic diarrhea (PED) infection, diagnosis and vaccination: A mini review.

Authors:  Simranjeet Singh Sekhon; Phat-Loc Nguyen; Ji-Young Ahn; Kyeong-Ah Lee; Lyon Lee; Sang Yong Kim; Hobaek Yoon; Jihoo Park; Jung Ho Ko; Yang-Hoon Kim
Journal:  Toxicol Environ Health Sci       Date:  2017-01-04

4.  An inactivated vaccine made from a U.S. field isolate of porcine epidemic disease virus is immunogenic in pigs as demonstrated by a dose-titration.

Authors:  Emily A Collin; Srivishnupriya Anbalagan; Faten Okda; Ron Batman; Eric Nelson; Ben M Hause
Journal:  BMC Vet Res       Date:  2015-03-15       Impact factor: 2.741

5.  Comparative Genomic Analysis of Classical and Variant Virulent Parental/Attenuated Strains of Porcine Epidemic Diarrhea Virus.

Authors:  Fangzhou Chen; Yinxing Zhu; Meizhou Wu; Xugang Ku; Shiyi Ye; Zhonghua Li; Xiaozhen Guo; Qigai He
Journal:  Viruses       Date:  2015-10-23       Impact factor: 5.048

Review 6.  Porcine epidemic diarrhea virus: An emerging and re-emerging epizootic swine virus.

Authors:  Changhee Lee
Journal:  Virol J       Date:  2015-12-22       Impact factor: 4.099

7.  Trypsin-independent porcine epidemic diarrhea virus US strain with altered virus entry mechanism.

Authors:  Yunjeong Kim; Changin Oh; Vinay Shivanna; Richard A Hesse; Kyeong-Ok Chang
Journal:  BMC Vet Res       Date:  2017-11-25       Impact factor: 2.741

8.  Evaluation and Comparison of the Pathogenicity and Host Immune Responses Induced by a G2b Taiwan Porcine Epidemic Diarrhea Virus (Strain Pintung 52) and Its Highly Cell-Culture Passaged Strain in Conventional 5-Week-Old Pigs.

Authors:  Yen-Chen Chang; Chi-Fei Kao; Chia-Yu Chang; Chian-Ren Jeng; Pei-Shiue Tsai; Victor Fei Pang; Hue-Ying Chiou; Ju-Yi Peng; Ivan-Chen Cheng; Hui-Wen Chang
Journal:  Viruses       Date:  2017-05-19       Impact factor: 5.048

9.  Chinese-like strain of porcine epidemic diarrhea virus, Thailand.

Authors:  Suphasawatt Puranaveja; Pariwat Poolperm; Preeda Lertwatcharasarakul; Sawang Kesdaengsakonwut; Alongkot Boonsoongnern; Kitcha Urairong; Pravina Kitikoon; Porjit Choojai; Roongtham Kedkovid; Komkrich Teankum; Roongroje Thanawongnuwech
Journal:  Emerg Infect Dis       Date:  2009-07       Impact factor: 6.883

10.  Manipulation of the porcine epidemic diarrhea virus genome using targeted RNA recombination.

Authors:  Chunhua Li; Zhen Li; Yong Zou; Oliver Wicht; Frank J M van Kuppeveld; Peter J M Rottier; Berend Jan Bosch
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-08-02       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.