Literature DB >> 10418840

Mechanisms of action of phenol block and botulinus toxin Type A in relieving spasticity: electrophysiologic investigation and follow-up.

A Y On1, Y Kirazli, B Kismali, R Aksit.   

Abstract

This preliminary study was designed to investigate the effects of botulinus toxin Type A and phenol treatments on electrophysiologic tests evaluating spinal afferent and efferent motor pathways involved in spasticity. The questions posed were whether different types of mechanisms act on reducing spasticity with these different treatment modalities and whether the tests are correlated with clinical recovery. Twenty patients with lower limb spasticity secondary to stroke were randomly assigned to receive 400 mouse units of botulinus toxin Type A injected into the calf muscles or to receive a tibial nerve blockade with 3 ml of 5% phenol. The amplitudes of the Achilles tendon response, M response, H reflex response, and maximum H:M ratio and Achilles tendon response to H response ratio were recorded from the soleus muscle at baseline and at Weeks 2, 4, and 12. The most obvious change was a reduction in the amplitude of the tendon response in the group that received botulinus toxin Type A, and it was a reduction in the M response amplitude in the group that received phenol. The decrease in the tendon response amplitude and tendon response to H ratio in the group that received botulinus toxin Type A and the decrease in the M response amplitude in the phenol group were found to be well correlated with clinical recovery as assessed by the Ashworth scale. The findings suggested that botulinus toxin Type A injection decreases spasticity primarily by affecting the fusimotor system and muscle spindle, and the involvement of the alpha-motor fibers within the tibial nerve is the most likely factor contributing to the reduction of spasticity after phenol blockade. The therapeutic effectiveness of these agents could be assessed and followed up by the changes in electrophysiologic responses matching their mechanisms of action. The findings should be supported by further electrophysiologic techniques.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10418840     DOI: 10.1097/00002060-199907000-00010

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Phys Med Rehabil        ISSN: 0894-9115            Impact factor:   2.159


  5 in total

Review 1.  Pharmacological interventions other than botulinum toxin for spasticity after stroke.

Authors:  Cameron Lindsay; Aphrodite Kouzouna; Christopher Simcox; Anand D Pandyan
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2016-10-06

Review 2.  Prolonged effect of botulinum toxin injection in the treatment of cricopharyngeal dysphagia: case report and literature review.

Authors:  Ming-Jang Chiu; Yeun-Chung Chang; Tzu-Yu Hsiao
Journal:  Dysphagia       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 3.438

3.  Spinal plasticity in stroke patients after botulinum neurotoxin A injection in ankle plantar flexors.

Authors:  Claire Aymard; Louis-Solal Giboin; Alexandra Lackmy-Vallée; Véronique Marchand-Pauvert
Journal:  Physiol Rep       Date:  2013-11-26

Review 4.  OnabotulinumtoxinA muscle injection patterns in adult spasticity: a systematic literature review.

Authors:  Luba Nalysnyk; Spyridon Papapetropoulos; Philip Rotella; Jason C Simeone; Katharine E Alter; Alberto Esquenazi
Journal:  BMC Neurol       Date:  2013-09-08       Impact factor: 2.474

Review 5.  Applications of botulinum toxin in dentistry: A comprehensive review.

Authors:  Sanjeev Srivastava; Smriti Kharbanda; U S Pal; Vinit Shah
Journal:  Natl J Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2015 Jul-Dec
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.