Literature DB >> 10418417

Quantitative research versus quality assurance, quality improvement, total quality management, and continuous quality improvement.

J Vogelsang1.   

Abstract

The purpose of this report is to provide a review of the scientific method used in the quantitative research studies for consumers, evaluators, and applied nurse researchers. The fundamental characteristics of the problem-solving/ performance-improvement processes of quality assurance, quality improvement, total quality management, and continuous quality improvement are described. Research is compared with these processes, and is followed by a discussion about the publication of quantitative research findings.

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10418417     DOI: 10.1016/s1089-9472(99)80021-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Perianesth Nurs        ISSN: 1089-9472            Impact factor:   1.084


  2 in total

Review 1.  A decision tool to guide the ethics review of a challenging breed of emerging genomic projects.

Authors:  Yann Joly; Derek So; Gladys Osien; Laura Crimi; Martin Bobrow; Don Chalmers; Susan E Wallace; Nikolajs Zeps; Bartha Knoppers
Journal:  Eur J Hum Genet       Date:  2016-01-20       Impact factor: 4.246

2.  Developing a practice-based research network by integrating quality improvement: challenges and ingredients for success.

Authors:  Laura-Mae Baldwin; Gina A Keppel; Ardis Davis; Janelle Guirguis-Blake; Rex W Force; Alfred O Berg
Journal:  Clin Transl Sci       Date:  2012-03-27       Impact factor: 4.689

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.