Literature DB >> 10417578

Treatment of upper lip wrinkles: a comparison of 950 microsec dwell time carbon dioxide laser with unoccluded Baker's phenol chemical peel.

J Chew1, I Gin, K A Rau, D B Amos, J B Bridenstine.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The high energy, pulsed, or computer-scanned continuous wave carbon dioxide laser (CO2 laser) has gained popularity as a wrinkle treatment because of its minimal thermal injury and precise control of tissue vaporization depth. Chemical peels such as phenol have also been effective in treating facial wrinkles. This is, to our knowledge, the first study comparing the use of CO2 laser to phenol for treatment of wrinkles on the upper lip.
OBJECTIVE: To compare the effectiveness and side effect profile of the 950 microsec dwell time CO2 laser to that of unoccluded Baker's phenol chemical peel in the treatment of upper lip wrinkles.
METHODS: Twenty female subjects with moderate to severe upper lip wrinkles were randomly treated with Baker's phenol on one side of the upper lip and the 950 microsec dwell time CO2 laser on the other side.
RESULTS: The average upper lip laser-treated wrinkle score (0 = none to 5 = severe) decreased from 4.30+/-0.20 before treatment to 1.11+/-0.28 at 6 months after treatment. The average upper lip phenol-treated wrinkle score decreased from 4.20+/-0.20 to 0.47+/-0.12. The degree in which the wrinkle score improved after phenol treatment compared with that after laser treatment was statistically significant (p<0.03).
CONCLUSION: Treatment of upper lip wrinkles with Baker's phenol resulted in greater improvement than treatment with the 950 microsec dwell time CO2 laser.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10417578     DOI: 10.1046/j.1524-4725.1999.08237.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Dermatol Surg        ISSN: 1076-0512            Impact factor:   3.398


  7 in total

1.  Evidence and considerations in the application of chemical peels in skin disorders and aesthetic resurfacing.

Authors:  Marta I Rendon; Diane S Berson; Joel L Cohen; Wendy E Roberts; Isaac Starker; Beatrice Wang
Journal:  J Clin Aesthet Dermatol       Date:  2010-07

Review 2.  [Chemical peels].

Authors:  N Y Schürer; L Wiest
Journal:  Hautarzt       Date:  2006-01       Impact factor: 0.751

Review 3.  Wrinkles.

Authors:  Juan Jorge Manríquez; Daniela Majerson Gringberg; Claudia Nicklas Diaz
Journal:  BMJ Clin Evid       Date:  2008-12-16

Review 4.  WITHDRAWN: Interventions for photodamaged skin.

Authors:  Miny Samuel; Rebecca Brooke; Sally Hollis; Christopher E M Griffiths
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2015-06-02

5.  Wrinkles.

Authors:  Juan Jorge Manríquez; Karina Cataldo; Cristián Vera-Kellet; Isidora Harz-Fresno
Journal:  BMJ Clin Evid       Date:  2014-12-22

Review 6.  [Chemical peels in aesthetic dermatology].

Authors:  L Wiest
Journal:  Hautarzt       Date:  2004-07       Impact factor: 0.751

7.  Highlights of thirty-year experience of CO2 laser use at the Florence (Italy) department of dermatology.

Authors:  Piero Campolmi; Paolo Bonan; Giovanni Cannarozzo; Andrea Bassi; Nicola Bruscino; Meena Arunachalam; Michela Troiano; Torello Lotti; Silvia Moretti
Journal:  ScientificWorldJournal       Date:  2012-04-19
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.