Literature DB >> 10417307

Effect of CWG methylation on expression of plant genes.

S Pradhan1, N A Urwin, G I Jenkins, R L Adams.   

Abstract

The presence of two DNA methyltransferases in Pisum raises the possibility that they serve different functions. In vitro methylation of CWG sequences in the strong cauliflower mosaic virus 35S promoter had no effect on reporter gene expression. In contrast, in vitro methylation of CWG sequences in the relatively weak, CG-deficient Phaseolus vulgaris rbcS2 promoter inhibited transcription. Expression of both constructs was strongly inhibited by extensive CG methylation. A search of published plant promoter sequences revealed that the CG content of promoters is very variable, with some promoters having typical CG islands. In contrast, the distribution of CWG sequences is more even with little evidence for CWG islands.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10417307      PMCID: PMC1220381     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biochem J        ISSN: 0264-6021            Impact factor:   3.857


  13 in total

1.  Inactive chromatin spreads from a focus of methylation.

Authors:  S U Kass; J P Goddard; R L Adams
Journal:  Mol Cell Biol       Date:  1993-12       Impact factor: 4.272

2.  Analysis of 1.9 Mb of contiguous sequence from chromosome 4 of Arabidopsis thaliana.

Authors:  M Bevan; I Bancroft; E Bent; K Love; H Goodman; C Dean; R Bergkamp; W Dirkse; M Van Staveren; W Stiekema; L Drost; P Ridley; S A Hudson; K Patel; G Murphy; P Piffanelli; H Wedler; E Wedler; R Wambutt; T Weitzenegger; T M Pohl; N Terryn; J Gielen; R Villarroel; R De Clerck; M Van Montagu; A Lecharny; S Auborg; I Gy; M Kreis; N Lao; T Kavanagh; S Hempel; P Kotter; K D Entian; M Rieger; M Schaeffer; B Funk; S Mueller-Auer; M Silvey; R James; A Montfort; A Pons; P Puigdomenech; A Douka; E Voukelatou; D Milioni; P Hatzopoulos; E Piravandi; B Obermaier; H Hilbert; A Düsterhöft; T Moores; J D Jones; T Eneva; K Palme; V Benes; S Rechman; W Ansorge; R Cooke; C Berger; M Delseny; M Voet; G Volckaert; H W Mewes; S Klosterman; C Schueller; N Chalwatzis
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1998-01-29       Impact factor: 49.962

3.  A CACGTG motif of the Antirrhinum majus chalcone synthase promoter is recognized by an evolutionarily conserved nuclear protein.

Authors:  D Staiger; H Kaulen; J Schell
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1989-09       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Distinct CG and CNG DNA methyltransferases in Pisum sativum.

Authors:  S Pradhan; R L Adams
Journal:  Plant J       Date:  1995-03       Impact factor: 6.417

5.  Sequence specificity of methylation in higher plant DNA.

Authors:  Y Gruenbaum; T Naveh-Many; H Cedar; A Razin
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1981-08-27       Impact factor: 49.962

6.  A sucrose repression element in the Phaseolus vulgaris rbcS2 gene promoter resembles elements responsible for sugar stimulation of plant and mammalian genes.

Authors:  N A Urwin; G I Jenkins
Journal:  Plant Mol Biol       Date:  1997-12       Impact factor: 4.076

7.  Cytosine methylation at CG and CNG sites is not a prerequisite for the initiation of transcriptional gene silencing in plants, but it is required for its maintenance.

Authors:  M J Diéguez; H Vaucheret; J Paszkowski; O Mittelsten Scheid
Journal:  Mol Gen Genet       Date:  1998-08

8.  Sequences flanking the hexameric G-box core CACGTG affect the specificity of protein binding.

Authors:  M E Williams; R Foster; N H Chua
Journal:  Plant Cell       Date:  1992-04       Impact factor: 11.277

9.  Unmethylated CpG islands associated with genes in higher plant DNA.

Authors:  F Antequera; A P Bird
Journal:  EMBO J       Date:  1988-08       Impact factor: 11.598

10.  Mutation of either G box or I box sequences profoundly affects expression from the Arabidopsis rbcS-1A promoter.

Authors:  R G Donald; A R Cashmore
Journal:  EMBO J       Date:  1990-06       Impact factor: 11.598

View more
  6 in total

Review 1.  Computational approaches to identify promoters and cis-regulatory elements in plant genomes.

Authors:  Stephane Rombauts; Kobe Florquin; Magali Lescot; Kathleen Marchal; Pierre Rouzé; Yves van de Peer
Journal:  Plant Physiol       Date:  2003-07       Impact factor: 8.340

2.  Characterization of carrot nuclear proteins that exhibit specific binding affinity towards conventional and non-conventional DNA methylation.

Authors:  L Pitto; F Cernilogar; M Evangelista; L Lombardi; C Miarelli; P Rocchi
Journal:  Plant Mol Biol       Date:  2000-11       Impact factor: 4.076

3.  GC3 biology in corn, rice, sorghum and other grasses.

Authors:  Tatiana V Tatarinova; Nickolai N Alexandrov; John B Bouck; Kenneth A Feldmann
Journal:  BMC Genomics       Date:  2010-05-16       Impact factor: 3.969

4.  Development of useful recombinant promoter and its expression analysis in different plant cells using confocal laser scanning microscopy.

Authors:  Deepak Kumar; Sunita Patro; Rajiv Ranjan; Dipak K Sahoo; Indu B Maiti; Nrisingha Dey
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2011-09-09       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  A Comprehensive Analysis of Codon Usage Patterns in Blunt Snout Bream (Megalobrama amblycephala) Based on RNA-Seq Data.

Authors:  Xiaoke Duan; Shaokui Yi; Xianwu Guo; Weimin Wang
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2015-05-26       Impact factor: 5.923

6.  PlantPAN: Plant promoter analysis navigator, for identifying combinatorial cis-regulatory elements with distance constraint in plant gene groups.

Authors:  Wen-Chi Chang; Tzong-Yi Lee; Hsien-Da Huang; His-Yuan Huang; Rong-Long Pan
Journal:  BMC Genomics       Date:  2008-11-26       Impact factor: 3.969

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.