Literature DB >> 10417001

Carbon dioxide accumulation, walking performance, and metabolic cost in the NASA launch and entry suit.

P A Bishop1, S M Lee, N E Conza, L L Clapp, A D Moore, W J Williams, M E Guilliams, M C Greenisen.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: In the event of an emergency on landing, Space Shuttle crewmembers while wearing the Launch and Entry Suit (LES) must stand, move to the hatch, exit the spacecraft with the helmet visor closed breathing 100% O2, and walk or run unassisted to a distance of 380 m upwind from the vehicle. The purpose of this study was to characterize the inspired CO2 and metabolic requirements during a simulated unaided egress from the Space Shuttle in healthy subjects wearing the LES.
METHODS: As a simulation of a Shuttle landing with an unaided egress, 12 male subjects completed a 6-min seated pre-breathe with 100% O2 followed by a 2-min stand and 5-min walking at 1.56 m x s(-1) (5.6 km x h(-1), 3.5 mph) with the helmet visor closed. During walks with four different G-suit pressures (0.0, 0.5, 1.0, 1.5 psi; 3.4, 6.9, 10.3 kPa), inspired CO2 and walking time were measured. After a 10-min seated recovery, subjects repeated the 5-min walk with the same G-suit pressure and the helmet visor open for the measurement of metabolic rate (VO2).
RESULTS: When G-suit inflation levels were 1.0 or 1.5 psi, only one-third of our subjects were able to complete the 5-min visor-closed walk after a 6-min pre-breathe. Inspired CO2 levels measured at the mouth were routinely greater than 4% (30 mmHg) during walking. The metabolic cost at the 1.5 psi G-suit inflation was over 135% of the metabolic cost at 0.0 psi inflation.
CONCLUSION: During unaided egress, G-suit inflation pressures of 1.0 and 1.5 psi resulted in elevated CO2 in the LES helmet and increased metabolic cost of walking, both of which may impact unaided egress performance. Neither the LES, the LES helmet, nor the G-suit were designed for ambulation. Data from this investigation suggests that adapting flight equipment for uses other than those for which it was originally designed can result in unforeseen problems.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10417001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Aviat Space Environ Med        ISSN: 0095-6562


  2 in total

1.  Gradient compression garments protect against orthostatic intolerance during recovery from bed rest.

Authors:  Michael B Stenger; Stuart M C Lee; L Christine Ribeiro; Tiffany R Phillips; Robert J Ploutz-Snyder; Michael C Willig; Christian M Westby; Steven H Platts
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2013-12-14       Impact factor: 3.078

2.  Artificial gravity training reduces bed rest-induced cardiovascular deconditioning.

Authors:  Michael B Stenger; Joyce M Evans; Charles F Knapp; Stuart M C Lee; Tiffany R Phillips; Sondra A Perez; Alan D Moore; William H Paloski; Steven H Platts
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2011-05-29       Impact factor: 3.078

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.