Literature DB >> 10416543

Shoe inserts and orthotics for sport and physical activities.

B M Nigg1, M A Nurse, D J Stefanyshyn.   

Abstract

The purposes of this paper were to discuss the perceived benefits of inserts and orthotics for sport activities and to propose a new concept for inserts and orthotics. There is evidence that inserts or orthotics reduce or prevent movement-related injuries. However, there is limited knowledge about the specific functioning an orthotic or insert provides. The same orthotic or insert is often proposed for different problems. Changes in skeletal movement due to inserts or orthotics seem to be small and not systematic. Based on the results of a study using bone pins, one may question the idea that a major function of orthotics or inserts consists in aligning the skeleton. Impact cushioning with shoe inserts or orthotics is typically below 10%. Such small reductions might not be important for injury reduction. It has been suggested that changes in material properties might produce adjustments in the muscular response of the locomotor system. The foot has various sensors to detect input signals with subject specific thresholds. Subjects with similar sensitivity threshold levels seem to respond in their movement pattern in a similar way. Comfort is an important variable. From a biomechanical point of view, comfort may be related to fit, additional stabilizing muscle work, fatigue, and damping of soft tissue vibrations. Based on the presented evidence, the concept of minimizing muscle work is proposed when using orthotics or inserts. A force signal acts as an input variable on the shoe. The shoe sole acts as a first filter, the insert or orthotic as a second filter, the plantar surface of the foot as a third filter for the force input signal. The filtered information is transferred to the central nervous system that provides a subject specific dynamic response. The subject performs the movement for the task at hand. For a given movement task, the skeleton has a preferred path. If an intervention supports/counteracts the preferred movement path, muscle activity can/must be reduced/increased. Based on this concept, an optimal insert or orthotic would reduce muscle activity, feel comfortable, and should increase performance.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10416543     DOI: 10.1097/00005768-199907001-00003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Sci Sports Exerc        ISSN: 0195-9131            Impact factor:   5.411


  35 in total

1.  Relation of anterior pelvic tilt during running to clinical and kinematic measures of hip extension.

Authors:  A G Schache; P D Blanch; A T Murphy
Journal:  Br J Sports Med       Date:  2000-08       Impact factor: 13.800

2.  Football boot insoles and sensitivity to extent of ankle inversion movement.

Authors:  G Waddington; R Adams
Journal:  Br J Sports Med       Date:  2003-04       Impact factor: 13.800

Review 3.  Preventing running injuries. Practical approach for family doctors.

Authors:  C A M Johnston; J E Taunton; D R Lloyd-Smith; D C McKenzie
Journal:  Can Fam Physician       Date:  2003-09       Impact factor: 3.275

4.  Effect of different types of shoes on balance among soccer players.

Authors:  Angela Notarnicola; Giuseppe Maccagnano; Vito Pesce; Silvio Tafuri; Marco Mercadante; Alessandra Fiore; Biagio Moretti
Journal:  Muscles Ligaments Tendons J       Date:  2015-10-20

5.  Effect of orthotics and footwear on static rearfoot kinematics.

Authors:  Molly Winkelmeyer; Brita Nelson; Therese Southworth; Kevin Carlson
Journal:  J Sports Sci Med       Date:  2006-09-01       Impact factor: 2.988

Review 6.  The efficacy of foot orthoses in the treatment of individuals with patellofemoral pain syndrome: a systematic review.

Authors:  Christian J Barton; Shannon E Munteanu; Hylton B Menz; Kay M Crossley
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2010-05-01       Impact factor: 11.136

Review 7.  Biomechanical analysis of the effect of orthotic shoe inserts: a review of the literature.

Authors:  M Razeghi; M E Batt
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2000-06       Impact factor: 11.136

8.  A retrospective case-control analysis of 2002 running injuries.

Authors:  J E Taunton; M B Ryan; D B Clement; D C McKenzie; D R Lloyd-Smith; B D Zumbo
Journal:  Br J Sports Med       Date:  2002-04       Impact factor: 13.800

9.  Rehabilitation of the Ankle After Acute Sprain or Chronic Instability.

Authors:  Carl G Mattacola; Maureen K Dwyer
Journal:  J Athl Train       Date:  2002-12       Impact factor: 2.860

10.  Contoured, prefabricated foot orthoses demonstrate comparable mechanical properties to contoured, customised foot orthoses: a plantar pressure study.

Authors:  Anthony C Redmond; Karl B Landorf; Anne-Maree Keenan
Journal:  J Foot Ankle Res       Date:  2009-06-16       Impact factor: 2.303

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.