BACKGROUND: Survival after cardiopulmonary resuscitation depends upon the quality of pre-hospital support, availability of resuscitation equipment and the competence of the resuscitator. There are few data on the prognosis of patients undergoing such resuscitation in India. METHODS: In a retrospective analysis of 215 resuscitations done in a 125-bed community hospital between January 1995 and November 1997, return of spontaneous circulation and survival to discharge were evaluated. Multivariate methods were used to identify the predictors of successful outcome. RESULTS: Of all the patients, 14.4% were alive at discharge. Survival after a cardiorespiratory arrest in the hospital was 18.4%, which was significantly better than survival after pre-hospital events (5.9%; p = 0.027). Multivariate predictors of survival at discharge were resuscitation duration of less than 20 minutes [odds ratio (95% confidence limit): 32.6 (6.5-164.3)], presentation with ventricular tachycardia or fibrillation [odds ratio: 18.5 (4.4-77.9)], in-hospital cardiorespiratory arrest [odds ratio: 5.2 (1.2-21.6)] and female sex [odds ratio: 3.2 (1.1-9.6)]. Bystander resuscitation, though rarely provided, increased survival at discharge (p = 0.026). CONCLUSIONS: With 5.5 resuscitation attempts needed for one live discharge after in-hospital cardiorespiratory arrest and 17 attempts to save a life after pre-hospital events, our outcomes are comparable to those reported from developed nations. A return of pulse after shorter durations of cardiopulmonary resuscitation, ventricular fibrillation or tachycardia as the abnormal presenting rhythm, in-hospital location of cardiorespiratory (CR) arrest and female sex were independent predictors of live discharge. Age and aetiology of CR arrest did not influence the outcome.
BACKGROUND: Survival after cardiopulmonary resuscitation depends upon the quality of pre-hospital support, availability of resuscitation equipment and the competence of the resuscitator. There are few data on the prognosis of patients undergoing such resuscitation in India. METHODS: In a retrospective analysis of 215 resuscitations done in a 125-bed community hospital between January 1995 and November 1997, return of spontaneous circulation and survival to discharge were evaluated. Multivariate methods were used to identify the predictors of successful outcome. RESULTS: Of all the patients, 14.4% were alive at discharge. Survival after a cardiorespiratory arrest in the hospital was 18.4%, which was significantly better than survival after pre-hospital events (5.9%; p = 0.027). Multivariate predictors of survival at discharge were resuscitation duration of less than 20 minutes [odds ratio (95% confidence limit): 32.6 (6.5-164.3)], presentation with ventricular tachycardia or fibrillation [odds ratio: 18.5 (4.4-77.9)], in-hospital cardiorespiratory arrest [odds ratio: 5.2 (1.2-21.6)] and female sex [odds ratio: 3.2 (1.1-9.6)]. Bystander resuscitation, though rarely provided, increased survival at discharge (p = 0.026). CONCLUSIONS: With 5.5 resuscitation attempts needed for one live discharge after in-hospital cardiorespiratory arrest and 17 attempts to save a life after pre-hospital events, our outcomes are comparable to those reported from developed nations. A return of pulse after shorter durations of cardiopulmonary resuscitation, ventricular fibrillation or tachycardia as the abnormal presenting rhythm, in-hospital location of cardiorespiratory (CR) arrest and female sex were independent predictors of live discharge. Age and aetiology of CR arrest did not influence the outcome.
Authors: Muhammad Junaid Patel; Nadeem Ullah Khan; Muhammad Furqan; Safia Awan; Muhammad Shoaib Khan; Waqar Kashif; Ayesha L Sorathia; Syed Ather Hussain; Mohammed Umer Mir Journal: Saudi J Anaesth Date: 2012-01
Authors: Nadeem Ullah Khan; Junaid A Razzak; Humaid Ahmed; Muhammad Furqan; Ali Faisal Saleem; Hammad Alam; Anwar ul Huda; Uzma Rahim Khan; Rifat Rehmani Journal: Int J Emerg Med Date: 2008-03-18