Literature DB >> 10414734

Contrast-enhanced three-dimensional power Doppler angiography of the human prostate: correlation with biopsy outcome.

H A Bogers1, J P Sedelaar, H P Beerlage, J J de la Rosette, F M Debruyne, H Wijkstra, R G Aarnink.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To determine the feasibility of contrast-enhanced three-dimensional (3D) imaging of the prostatic vasculature using power Doppler imaging and to analyze whether semiquantitative judgments of 3D images with respect to symmetry and distribution of vascular structures correlated with biopsy outcome.
METHODS: 3D power Doppler images were obtained before and after intravenous administration of 2.5 g Levovist. Subsequently, random and/or directed transrectal ultrasound (TRUS)-guided biopsies were performed. Vascular images were analyzed by two experts. Prostate vasculature was judged with respect to symmetry and vessel distribution using a (scale) grading system.
RESULTS: Eighteen patients with a suspicion of prostate cancer either because of an elevated prostate-specific antigen (greater than 4.0 ng/mL; Tandem-R-assay) or an abnormal digital rectal examination were included in the study. Prostate cancer was detected in 13 patients. Vascular anatomy was judged abnormal in unenhanced images in 6 cases, of which 5 proved malignant. Enhanced images were considered suspicious for malignancy in 12 cases, including 1 benign and 11 malignant biopsy results. Sensitivity of enhanced images was 85% (specificity 80%) compared with 38% for unenhanced images (specificity 80%) and 77% for conventional gray-scale TRUS (specificity 60%). Of 6 patients who showed no B-mode abnormalities, vascular patterns were judged abnormal in 4 cases, of which 3 were malignant.
CONCLUSIONS: Contrast-enhanced 3D power Doppler angiography is feasible in patients with suspicion of prostate cancer who are scheduled for prostate biopsies. The sensitivity of power Doppler 3D imaging for the detection of prostate malignancy increased from 38% (5 of 13) to 85% (11 of 13) after administration of intravascular microbubble contrast (Levovist), and specificity was found to be 80% (4 of 5) for both imaging modalities. Thus, the use of Levovist when combined with the power Doppler display mode and 3D image reconstruction offers a promising new research area that might prove useful in prostate cancer detection in the future.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10414734     DOI: 10.1016/s0090-4295(99)00040-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Urology        ISSN: 0090-4295            Impact factor:   2.649


  18 in total

Review 1.  Methods for volume assessment of prostate cancer.

Authors:  Heinz-Peter Schlemmer; Stefan Corvin
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2004-02-06       Impact factor: 5.315

2.  [Transrectal ultrasound of the prostate. Current status and prospects].

Authors:  M Zacharias; K V Jenderka; H Heynemann; P Fornara
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2002-11       Impact factor: 0.639

Review 3.  Three dimensional ultrasound and prostate cancer.

Authors:  S S Mehta; A R Azzouzi; F C Hamdy
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2004-11-12       Impact factor: 4.226

Review 4.  A comparison of the diagnostic performance of systematic versus ultrasound-guided biopsies of prostate cancer.

Authors:  Stijn W T P J Heijmink; Hilco van Moerkerk; Lambertus A L M Kiemeney; J Alfred Witjes; Ferdinand Frauscher; Jelle O Barentsz
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2006-01-04       Impact factor: 5.315

5.  Contrast-enhanced ultrasound imaging of prostate cancer.

Authors:  Ethan J Halpern
Journal:  Rev Urol       Date:  2006

Review 6.  [Ultrasound contrast agents and prostate cancer].

Authors:  F Frauscher; L Pallwein; A Klauser; A P Berger; F Koppelstaetter; J Gradl; M Schurich; J Bektic; G M Pinggera; E J Halpern; W Horninger; G Bartsch; D zur Nedden
Journal:  Radiologe       Date:  2005-06       Impact factor: 0.635

7.  Contrast enhanced transrectal ultrasound for the detection of prostate cancer: a randomized, double-blind trial of dutasteride pretreatment.

Authors:  Ethan J Halpern; Leonard G Gomella; Flemming Forsberg; Peter A McCue; Edouard J Trabulsi
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2012-09-19       Impact factor: 7.450

Review 8.  [Innovative concepts in early cancer detection and staging of localized prostate cancer].

Authors:  L Rinnab; R Küfer; R E Hautmann; B G Volkmer; M Straub; N M Blumstein; H W Gottfried
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2005-11       Impact factor: 0.639

Review 9.  Contrast specific imaging in the detection and localization of prostate cancer.

Authors:  Hessel Wijkstra; Margot H Wink; Jean J M C H de la Rosette
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2004-10-05       Impact factor: 4.226

Review 10.  Transrectal contrast enhanced ultrasound for diagnosis of prostate cancer.

Authors:  M H Wink; J J M C H de la Rosette; C A Grimbergen; H Wijkstra
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2007-06-27       Impact factor: 4.226

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.