Literature DB >> 10414693

Appendicitis is a place for clinical judgement.

E Bergeron1, B Richer, R Gharib, A Giard.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Acute appendicitis remains a clinical entity. Reports of negative appendectomies range from 9% to 40%. The goal of this study is to evaluate clinical performance and factors associated with complicated appendicitis.
METHODS: Records of patients with a preoperative or postoperative diagnosis of appendicitis between January 1994 and December 1997 were reviewed. Demographic, clinical, and paraclinical data were collected. Multivariate analysis was carried out by logistical regression.
RESULTS: Two hundred and thirty-seven consecutive cases were reviewed (male 132, female 105). The mean age was 31.4 +/- 16.8. Twenty-three cases had other surgical conditions. In the remaining cases (n = 214), 127 (59.4%) had noncomplicated appendicitis, 69 (32.2%) had complicated appendicitis, and 18 (8.4%) had negative exploration. Delays occurring before first medical consultation were significantly longer in patients with complicated appendicitis (3.30 days) and negative exploration (3.00 days) compared to patients with noncomplicated appendicitis (1.24 days) (P < 0.001).
CONCLUSIONS: Acceptable rates of negative appendix and complicated appendicitis can be obtained from clinical data. The presence of complicated appendicitis is primarily associated with a longer delay before first medical consultation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10414693     DOI: 10.1016/s0002-9610(99)00092-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Surg        ISSN: 0002-9610            Impact factor:   2.565


  8 in total

1.  Can we improve diagnosis of acute appendicitis?

Authors:  S W Beasly
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2000-10-14

2.  Increased risk of surgery in undiagnosed celiac disease.

Authors:  C Ciacci; R Cavallaro; R Romano; D S Galletta; F Labanca; M Marino; M Donisi; G Mazzacca
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2001-10       Impact factor: 3.199

3.  Clinical judgment remains of great value in the diagnosis of acute appendicitis.

Authors:  Eric Bergeron
Journal:  Can J Surg       Date:  2006-04       Impact factor: 2.089

4.  Review of the pathological results of 2660 appendicectomy specimens.

Authors:  Ravi Marudanayagam; Geraint T Williams; Brian I Rees
Journal:  J Gastroenterol       Date:  2006-08       Impact factor: 7.527

5.  Efficacy of the Evaluation of Inflammatory Markers for the Reduction of Negative Appendectomy Rates.

Authors:  Fatih Mehmet Yazar; Aykut Urfalioglu; Murat Bakacak; Ömer Faruk Boran; Ertan Bülbüloğlu
Journal:  Indian J Surg       Date:  2016-10-18       Impact factor: 0.656

Review 6.  Acute appendicitis in young children less than 5 years: review article.

Authors:  Hamdi Hameed Almaramhy
Journal:  Ital J Pediatr       Date:  2017-01-26       Impact factor: 2.638

7.  Acute appendicitis: is removal of a normal appendix still existing and can we reduce its rate?

Authors:  Gamal Khairy
Journal:  Saudi J Gastroenterol       Date:  2009 Jul-Sep       Impact factor: 2.485

8.  Mean platelet volume and red cell distribution width as a diagnostic marker in acute appendicitis.

Authors:  Ceren Sen Tanrikulu; Yusuf Tanrikulu; Mehmet Zafer Sabuncuoglu; Mehmet Akif Karamercan; Nezih Akkapulu; Figen Coskun
Journal:  Iran Red Crescent Med J       Date:  2014-05-05       Impact factor: 0.611

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.