Literature DB >> 10413541

Context-dependent, risk-sensitive foraging preferences in wild rufous hummingbirds.

.   

Abstract

We tested the risk-sensitive foraging preferences of wild rufous hummingbirds, Selasphorus rufus, with three types of artificial flowers. All three flower types provided the same mean volume of 30 µl of sucrose, but differed in terms of variability of the reward: constant, low variance and high variance. In trinary comparisons, subjects preferred the low-variance reward over the constant reward, and the constant reward over the high-variance reward; a result not predicted by risk-sensitive foraging theory. However, when tested with traditional binary comparisons, hummingbirds showed conventional risk-averse behaviour and selected the constant reward over the low- or high-variance rewards. This reversal of preference represents a context-dependent foraging preference. The utility of selecting intermediate levels of risk and the source of the preference reversal are discussed relative to risk-sensitive foraging theory and the effects of local context on foraging choices. Copyright 1999 The Association for the Study of Animal Behaviour.

Entities:  

Year:  1999        PMID: 10413541     DOI: 10.1006/anbe.1999.1130

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Anim Behav        ISSN: 0003-3472            Impact factor:   2.844


  16 in total

1.  The effect of rate of reinforcement and time in session on preference for variability.

Authors:  Frances K McSweeney; Benjamin P Kowal; Eric S Murphy
Journal:  Learn Behav       Date:  2003-08       Impact factor: 1.986

2.  Rhesus macaques (Macaca mulatta) exhibit the decoy effect in a perceptual discrimination task.

Authors:  Audrey E Parrish; Theodore A Evans; Michael J Beran
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2015-07       Impact factor: 2.199

3.  Do we expect natural selection to produce rational behaviour?

Authors:  Alasdair I Houston; John M McNamara; Mark D Steer
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2007-09-29       Impact factor: 6.237

4.  Optimal behaviour can violate the principle of regularity.

Authors:  Pete C Trimmer
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2013-06-05       Impact factor: 5.349

5.  Initial uncertainty in Pavlovian reward prediction persistently elevates incentive salience and extends sign-tracking to normally unattractive cues.

Authors:  Mike J F Robinson; Patrick Anselme; Adam M Fischer; Kent C Berridge
Journal:  Behav Brain Res       Date:  2014-03-11       Impact factor: 3.332

6.  Irrational decision-making in an amoeboid organism: transitivity and context-dependent preferences.

Authors:  Tanya Latty; Madeleine Beekman
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2010-08-11       Impact factor: 5.349

7.  Reward uncertainty enhances incentive salience attribution as sign-tracking.

Authors:  Patrick Anselme; Mike J F Robinson; Kent C Berridge
Journal:  Behav Brain Res       Date:  2012-10-16       Impact factor: 3.332

8.  Starlings uphold principles of economic rationality for delay and probability of reward.

Authors:  Tiago Monteiro; Marco Vasconcelos; Alex Kacelnik
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2013-02-06       Impact factor: 5.349

9.  Context-dependent foraging decisions in rufous hummingbirds.

Authors:  Melissa Bateson; Susan D Healy; T Andrew Hurly
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2003-06-22       Impact factor: 5.349

10.  Risk sensitivity, phylogenetic reconstruction, and four chimpanzees.

Authors:  Ken Sayers; Charles R Menzel
Journal:  Behav Ecol Sociobiol       Date:  2016-12-20       Impact factor: 2.980

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.