Literature DB >> 10412174

[Confusing tissue samples: causes, consequences, prevention].

S Banaschak1, C Witting, B Brinkmann.   

Abstract

The rising numbers of tissue samples for securing a diagnosis has led to a multitude of tissue samples in pathology institutes. Criteria and measures for ensuring the quality of histological diagnosis have been developed. Corresponding rules for the organization of the tissue sampling up to their processing do not yet exist. Suspicion of interchanged samples occurs much more often than it actually happens; however, it is important to be aware of the possibility so as to inform the clinician and to eliminate any possible causes of the confusion. The civil and penal consequences of such an interchanging, the subsequent "incorrect" diagnosis and the therapeutic measures are secondary compared to the potentially dramatic consequences for the patient. Important causes for an interchanging and possible preventive measures are presented.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10412174     DOI: 10.1007/s002920050338

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pathologe        ISSN: 0172-8113            Impact factor:   1.011


  4 in total

1.  Artificial recombination in forensic mtDNA population databases.

Authors:  H J Bandelt; A Salas; S Lutz-Bonengel
Journal:  Int J Legal Med       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 2.686

2.  [Forensic DNA-analysis in pathology].

Authors:  M A Verhoff; U Stachetzki; F Heidorn
Journal:  Pathologe       Date:  2005-07       Impact factor: 1.011

3.  [Clarification of tissue contamination in a suspected adenocarcinoma of the spermatic cord by microsatellite analysis].

Authors:  M Bodenbach; P Adam; K Kraft; H K Müller-Hermelink; C Sparwasser
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2004-07       Impact factor: 0.639

Review 4.  Confusion-specimen mix-up in dermatopathology and measures to prevent and detect it.

Authors:  Wolfgang Weyers
Journal:  Dermatol Pract Concept       Date:  2014-01-31
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.