Literature DB >> 10411198

Mandatory reporting of diseases and conditions by health care professionals and laboratories.

S Roush1, G Birkhead, D Koo, A Cobb, D Fleming.   

Abstract

CONTEXT: Surveillance is a key component of the core public health function of health assessment. Systematic reporting by health care professionals and laboratories, which may vary by state law, statute, or regulation, continues to provide essential data for assessing public health.
OBJECTIVE: To describe the state and territorial reporting requirements for diseases and conditions recommended for national public health surveillance. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: Between May and August 1997, the state and territorial epidemiologists from all 50 states, in addition to New York City, Puerto Rico, and Guam, completed questionnaires indicating which diseases and conditions were reportable by health care professionals and laboratories in their jurisdictions. The surveys were subsequently updated to reflect reporting requirements current as of January 1, 1999. The overall response rate for the survey was 100% for US states and 90% overall, including the territories. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: State and territorial reporting requirements for diseases and conditions of public health concern.
RESULTS: Of the 58 diseases and conditions recommended for national reporting, 35 (60%) were reportable in greater than 90% of the states and territories, 15 (26%) were reportable in 75% to 90%, and 8 (14%) were reportable in less than 75%. Nineteen of the infectious diseases were reportable in all of the states and territories that responded.
CONCLUSIONS: Required reporting varies substantially by state or territory. Health care professionals are integral to public health efforts at the local, state, and national levels.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Empirical Approach; Health Care and Public Health; Legal Approach

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10411198     DOI: 10.1001/jama.282.2.164

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  JAMA        ISSN: 0098-7484            Impact factor:   56.272


  37 in total

1.  Public health 101 for informaticians.

Authors:  D Koo; P O'Carroll; M LaVenture
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2001 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 4.497

2.  Introduction of a hierarchy to LOINC to facilitate public health reporting.

Authors:  Steven Steindel; John W Loonsk; Alan Sim; Timothy J Doyle; Robb S Chapman; Samuel L Groseclose
Journal:  Proc AMIA Symp       Date:  2002

3.  Legal Authority for Infectious Disease Reporting in the United States: Case Study of the 2009 H1N1 Influenza Pandemic.

Authors:  Richard N Danila; Ellen S Laine; Franci Livingston; Kathryn Como-Sabetti; Lauren Lamers; Kelli Johnson; Anne M Barry
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2015-01       Impact factor: 9.308

4.  Surveillance in occupational health.

Authors:  D Koh; T-C Aw
Journal:  Occup Environ Med       Date:  2003-09       Impact factor: 4.402

Review 5.  How outbreaks of infectious disease are detected: a review of surveillance systems and outbreaks.

Authors:  Virginia Dato; Michael M Wagner; Abi Fapohunda
Journal:  Public Health Rep       Date:  2004 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 2.792

6.  A comparison of the completeness and timeliness of automated electronic laboratory reporting and spontaneous reporting of notifiable conditions.

Authors:  J Marc Overhage; Shaun Grannis; Clement J McDonald
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2008-01-02       Impact factor: 9.308

7.  Electronic Support for Public Health: validated case finding and reporting for notifiable diseases using electronic medical data.

Authors:  Ross Lazarus; Michael Klompas; Francis X Campion; Scott J N McNabb; Xuanlin Hou; James Daniel; Gillian Haney; Alfred DeMaria; Leslie Lenert; Richard Platt
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2008-10-24       Impact factor: 4.497

8.  Evaluation of a communications campaign to increase physician reporting to a surveillance system.

Authors:  Kitty H Gelberg; Ian F Brissette; Karen Cummings
Journal:  Public Health Rep       Date:  2011 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 2.792

9.  Differences among U.S. states in estimating the number of people living with HIV/AIDS: impact on allocation of federal Ryan White funding.

Authors:  Denis Nash; Evie Andreopoulos; Deborah Horowitz; Nancy Sohler; David Vlahov
Journal:  Public Health Rep       Date:  2007 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 2.792

10.  Sentinel surveillance: a reliable way to track antibiotic resistance in communities?

Authors:  Stephanie J Schrag; Elizabeth R Zell; Anne Schuchat; Cynthia G Whitney
Journal:  Emerg Infect Dis       Date:  2002-05       Impact factor: 6.883

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.