K Morgan1. 1. Centre for Ageing and Rehabilitation Studies, School of Health and Related Research, University of Sheffield, Northern General Hospital, UK. k.morgan@sheffield.ac.uk
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: first, to describe the background and methodological approach to the assessment of customary physical activity, health and psycho-social status used by the Nottingham Longitudinal Study of Activity and Ageing; second, to provide information on the sampling strategy and survey response rates for three waves of data collection; and, third, to provide information on the reliability and validity of the survey assessments. DESIGN: longitudinal study. SUBJECTS: 1042 people originally aged 65 and over, randomly sampled from general practitioner lists in Nottingham, UK. METHODS: a descriptive overview of response rates (%), instrument reliability (alpha coefficients) and intercorrelations among measured outcomes (correlation coefficients and principal components analysis). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: questionnaire-assessed levels of physical activity; instrumental measurements of handgrip strength, weight, demi-span and shoulder flexibility; brief assessments of depression, social engagement, life-satisfaction and cognitive impairment. RESULTS: the study achieved a baseline (TI) response rate of 80%, with re-interview rates of 88% and 73% for T2 (1989) and T3 (1993) surveys respectively. For both men and women, factor scores derived from first principal components extracted from T1 survey data showed significant (r > or = 0.4; P < 0.001) product moment correlations with instrumental measurements of handgrip strength and shoulder flexibility. All the brief assessment measures showed satisfactory levels of reliability (alpha > or = 0.7).
OBJECTIVES: first, to describe the background and methodological approach to the assessment of customary physical activity, health and psycho-social status used by the Nottingham Longitudinal Study of Activity and Ageing; second, to provide information on the sampling strategy and survey response rates for three waves of data collection; and, third, to provide information on the reliability and validity of the survey assessments. DESIGN: longitudinal study. SUBJECTS: 1042 people originally aged 65 and over, randomly sampled from general practitioner lists in Nottingham, UK. METHODS: a descriptive overview of response rates (%), instrument reliability (alpha coefficients) and intercorrelations among measured outcomes (correlation coefficients and principal components analysis). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: questionnaire-assessed levels of physical activity; instrumental measurements of handgrip strength, weight, demi-span and shoulder flexibility; brief assessments of depression, social engagement, life-satisfaction and cognitive impairment. RESULTS: the study achieved a baseline (TI) response rate of 80%, with re-interview rates of 88% and 73% for T2 (1989) and T3 (1993) surveys respectively. For both men and women, factor scores derived from first principal components extracted from T1 survey data showed significant (r > or = 0.4; P < 0.001) product moment correlations with instrumental measurements of handgrip strength and shoulder flexibility. All the brief assessment measures showed satisfactory levels of reliability (alpha > or = 0.7).
Authors: Darina V Petrovsky; Justine S Sefcik; Alexandra L Hanlon; Alicia J Lozano; Pamela Z Cacchione Journal: Res Gerontol Nurs Date: 2019-07-09 Impact factor: 1.571
Authors: Remigiusz Dróżdż; Marcin Pasek; Magdalena Zając; Mirosława Szark-Eckardt Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2022-09-16 Impact factor: 4.614