A James1, K Kapur, A B Hawthorne. 1. Department of Gastroenterology, University Hospital of Wales, Heath Park, Cardiff, UK.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: investigation of length of survival, complications, level of dependence and recovery of swallow in patients who received percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG) feeding for dysphagia due to stroke. DESIGN: a retrospective case note analysis of patients treated between 1991 and 1995 and telephone survey of modified Barthel index in October 1996. SETTING: Cardiff Royal Infirmary and the University Hospital of Wales in Cardiff. SUBJECTS: 126 patients who had PEG inserted after dysphagic stroke. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: complications of PEG, length of survival, duration of PEG feeding, recovery of swallow and modified Barthel index score. RESULTS: median length of follow-up was 31 months (range 4-71). Median duration of PEG use was 127 days (range 1-1372). For patients with PEG inserted within 2 weeks the median duration was 52 days (range 2-1478). At follow up 36 (29%) had had PEG removed, 72 (57%) had died with PEG in use, 10 (8%) still had PEG and were nil by mouth and five (4%) had PEG in use with swallow recovered. The median survival was 305 days. Thirty-five (28%) patients died in hospital. Aspiration pneumonia was the commonest complication. Thirty-three patients were alive in October 1996. The modified Barthel index for nursing home patients was 4 (range 0-13) and for patients at home 11 (range 2-20). CONCLUSION: PEG feeding is safe and well tolerated in patients with dysphagic stroke. Early PEG placement (within 2 weeks) is worthwhile with many going on to have long-term feeding. Although overall mortality is high, some patients have a long-term survival and a few attain a reasonable level of function in daily living activities. Late recovery of swallow occurs and patients should have follow-up swallowing assessment.
OBJECTIVE: investigation of length of survival, complications, level of dependence and recovery of swallow in patients who received percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG) feeding for dysphagia due to stroke. DESIGN: a retrospective case note analysis of patients treated between 1991 and 1995 and telephone survey of modified Barthel index in October 1996. SETTING: Cardiff Royal Infirmary and the University Hospital of Wales in Cardiff. SUBJECTS: 126 patients who had PEG inserted after dysphagic stroke. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: complications of PEG, length of survival, duration of PEG feeding, recovery of swallow and modified Barthel index score. RESULTS: median length of follow-up was 31 months (range 4-71). Median duration of PEG use was 127 days (range 1-1372). For patients with PEG inserted within 2 weeks the median duration was 52 days (range 2-1478). At follow up 36 (29%) had had PEG removed, 72 (57%) had died with PEG in use, 10 (8%) still had PEG and were nil by mouth and five (4%) had PEG in use with swallow recovered. The median survival was 305 days. Thirty-five (28%) patients died in hospital. Aspiration pneumonia was the commonest complication. Thirty-three patients were alive in October 1996. The modified Barthel index for nursing home patients was 4 (range 0-13) and for patients at home 11 (range 2-20). CONCLUSION:PEG feeding is safe and well tolerated in patients with dysphagic stroke. Early PEG placement (within 2 weeks) is worthwhile with many going on to have long-term feeding. Although overall mortality is high, some patients have a long-term survival and a few attain a reasonable level of function in daily living activities. Late recovery of swallow occurs and patients should have follow-up swallowing assessment.
Authors: R Wirth; D Volkert; J M Bauer; R J Schulz; M Borchelt; C Fleischhauer; E Steinhagen-Thiessen; C C Sieber Journal: Z Gerontol Geriatr Date: 2007-02 Impact factor: 1.281
Authors: Karen Porter; Nicola Burch; Claire Campbell; Chris Danbury; Charles Foster; Simon Gabe; Andrew Goddard; Katie Harp; Anne Holdoway; Tom Hughes; Karen Le Ball; Jeremy Nightingale; Andrew Rochford; Alex Ruck Keene; Alison Smith; Trevor Smith; Aminda De Silva Journal: Clin Med (Lond) Date: 2021-07 Impact factor: 2.659
Authors: Ata A Rahnemai-Azar; Amir A Rahnemaiazar; Rozhin Naghshizadian; Amparo Kurtz; Daniel T Farkas Journal: World J Gastroenterol Date: 2014-06-28 Impact factor: 5.742