Literature DB >> 10407605

A European version of the Appropriateness Evaluation Protocol. Goals and presentation. The BIOMED I Group on Appropriateness of Hospital Use.

T Lang1, A Liberati, A Tampieri, G Fellin, M da L Gonsalves, S Lorenzo, M Pearson, R Beech, B Santos-Eggimann.   

Abstract

This paper describes the development and testing of a European version of the Appropriateness Evaluation Protocol (AEP). It stemmed from the original U.S. version and the multiple adaptations and modifications made previously and separately by researchers in European countries. The group was particularly concerned with developing a common list of reasons for inappropriate admissions and days of stay, since the principal goal was to enable an understanding of inappropriate hospital use and potential solutions within local health and social care systems. Developing a common EU-AEP included several steps. First, each national instrument was translated from the national language to English. These back translations were compared with each other and with the US-AEP. A working group analyzed the content of the lists of reasons published in the literature and proposed a novel conceptual approach. On the basis of workshop discussions, a draft of a common European version was circulated to each participant for agreement. In the EU-AEP, the clinical criteria for the appropriateness of admission include 10 related to patient condition and five to clinical services. The criteria for the appropriateness of days of care include 10 covering medical services, six for life support/nursing services, and eight related to patient condition. The proposed core list of reasons of inappropriateness distinguish clearly between two concepts: a) the level of care required by the patient; and b) the reason why this level of care was not used. The first list would thus refer to the nature of resources and facilities required, while the second would focus more on the efficient organization of those resources. A validated European tool to assess inappropriate hospital admissions and hospital days of stay and their causes might be used to assess the need for resources for inpatient care as well as for outpatient care. Assessing the reasons for inadequacies might lead also to the examination of organizational questions. Finally, a common tool allows comparisons between countries concerning the frequency of inappropriate admissions and days of stay and their reasons in relation to the different organizations of health care across Europe.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10407605     DOI: 10.1017/s0266462399152784

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Technol Assess Health Care        ISSN: 0266-4623            Impact factor:   2.188


  11 in total

1.  Inappropriate admissions: thoughts of patients and referring doctors.

Authors:  J Campbell
Journal:  J R Soc Med       Date:  2001-12       Impact factor: 5.344

2.  Primary and secondary care collaboration for end of life care.

Authors:  David Law
Journal:  London J Prim Care (Abingdon)       Date:  2009

3.  Inappropriate hospital admission: interaction between patient age and co-morbidity.

Authors:  Gudrun Gamper; Wolfgang Wiedermann; Riccardo Barisonzo; Ingrid Stockner; Christian Josef Wiedermann
Journal:  Intern Emerg Med       Date:  2011-06-08       Impact factor: 3.397

4.  The characteristics and prognosis of patients fulfilling the Appropriateness Evaluation Protocol in a medical admission unit; a prospective observational study.

Authors:  Mikkel Brabrand; Torben Knudsen; Jesper Hallas
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2011-06-27       Impact factor: 2.655

5.  Accelerated discharge of patients in the event of a major incident: observational study of a teaching hospital.

Authors:  Kirsty Challen; Darren Walter
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2006-04-26       Impact factor: 3.295

6.  Current level and determinants of inappropriate admissions to township hospitals under the new rural cooperative medical system in China: a cross-sectional study.

Authors:  Yan Zhang; Yingchun Chen; Xiang Zhang; Liang Zhang
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2014-12-18       Impact factor: 2.655

7.  Determinants of Inappropriate Admissions in County Hospitals in Rural China: A Cross-Sectional Study.

Authors:  Yan Zhang; Liang Zhang; Haomiao Li; Yingchun Chen
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2018-05-23       Impact factor: 3.390

8.  Assessment of appropriateness of hospitalisations in Ukraine: analytical framework, method and findings.

Authors:  Feng Zhao; Olena Doroshenko; Valery N Lekhan; Lilia V Kriachkova; Alona Goroshko
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2019-12-08       Impact factor: 2.692

9.  Reliability and Validity of the Chinese Version Appropriateness Evaluation Protocol.

Authors:  Wenwei Liu; Suwei Yuan; Fengqing Wei; Jing Yang; Zhe Zhang; Changbin Zhu; Jin Ma
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-08-25       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Reliability and Validity of the Appropriateness Evaluation Protocol for Public Hospitals in Korea.

Authors:  Clara Lee; Stella Jung-Hyun Kim; Changwoo Lee; Euichul Shin
Journal:  J Prev Med Public Health       Date:  2019-09-12
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.