Literature DB >> 10406718

Why be a honeyless honey mesquite? Reproduction and mating system of nectarful and nectarless individuals.

J Golubov1, L E Eguiarte, M C Mandujano, J López-Portillo, C Montaña.   

Abstract

Populations of Prosopis glandulosa var. torreyana in the Chihuahuan desert have a fixed dimorphic system of nectar production in which half the individuals produce nectar (are nectarful) and the other half are nectarless. We analyzed the impact of nectar production on different estimates of fitness, comparing nectarful against nectarless individuals in size, mating system, seed traits, and fruit set in a 1-ha scrubland. Of the reproductive individuals (358), 46% were nectarful and 54% were nectarless. Neither tree size nor flowering phenology differed between nectar morphs. Fixation indices (F) for both progeny (F = -0.2) and adults (F = -0.45) were negative, and high heterozygosities were found in adults and progeny (H = 0.45). No differences were found between nectar morphs for F, H, and single (t(s) = 1.1) and multilocus (t(m) = 1.03) outcrossing rates. Controlled pollinations showed differences between selfing and control treatments with no differences between nectar morphs. Nectarless individuals produced significantly more pollen grains than did nectar producers, but all other measured floral traits showed no differences. Nectarful trees were visited by pollinators 21 times more often and had a significantly higher overall fruit set than did nectarless trees. No differences between nectar morphs in seed mass or in percentage seed germination were found, but heavier seeds tended to have higher heterozygosities. Both morphs had similar success as females, but nectarless trees had ∼7% higher male function. We discuss three possible scenarios for the evolution of the fixed dimorphism in nectar production, two involving unstable phases (substitution of one morph by the other, and evolution towards dioecy) and one stable scenario (maintenance of the dimorphic system).

Entities:  

Year:  1999        PMID: 10406718

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Bot        ISSN: 0002-9122            Impact factor:   3.844


  5 in total

1.  Nectarless flowers: ecological correlates and evolutionary stability.

Authors:  Juilee D Thakar; Krushnamegh Kunte; Anisha K Chauhan; Aparna V Watve; Milind G Watve
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2003-06-28       Impact factor: 3.225

2.  Genetic structure and outcrossing rates in Flourensia cernua (Asteraceae) growing at different densities in the South-western Chihuahuan Desert.

Authors:  Miriam M Ferrer; Luis E Eguiarte; Carlos Montana
Journal:  Ann Bot       Date:  2004-07-26       Impact factor: 4.357

3.  Cheating can stabilize cooperation in mutualisms.

Authors:  Kevin R Foster; Hanna Kokko
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2006-09-07       Impact factor: 5.349

4.  The evolution of floral nectaries in Disa (Orchidaceae: Disinae): recapitulation or diversifying innovation?

Authors:  Nina Hobbhahn; Steven D Johnson; Benny Bytebier; Edward C Yeung; Lawrence D Harder
Journal:  Ann Bot       Date:  2013-08-29       Impact factor: 4.357

5.  Noisy communities and signal detection: why do foragers visit rewardless flowers?

Authors:  Elinor M Lichtenberg; Jacob M Heiling; Judith L Bronstein; Jessica L Barker
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2020-05-18       Impact factor: 6.237

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.