Literature DB >> 10406473

Long-pulsed alexandrite laser-assisted hair removal at 5, 10, and 20 millisecond pulse durations.

C A Nanni1, T S Alster.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Several laser systems with varying wavelengths, pulse durations, and energy fluences are currently utilized for hair removal. However, the ideal laser parameters and treatment candidates for photoepilation remain largely unknown. The medical literature lacks a wealth of experimental data to sufficiently document the long-term safety and efficacy of laser-assisted hair removal. This study examines the clinical efficacy and side effect profile of long-pulsed alexandrite laser-assisted hair removal utilizing laser pulse durations of either 5, 10, or 20 milliseconds (ms). STUDY DESIGN/
METHODS: Laser-assisted hair removal was performed on 36 subjects with a long-pulsed alexandrite laser. Areas of unwanted hair growth on the face, back, and legs were divided linearly into four 1 cm2 or 2 cm2 quadrants. Experimental regions included a control quadrant and three additional quadrants, which were treated with the alexandrite laser using an average fluence of 18 J/cm2, with a 10 mm spot size at either a 5, 10, or 20 ms pulse duration. Hair counts and photographs were obtained before treatment, immediately following irradiation, 1 week and 1, 3, and 6 months postoperatively.
RESULTS: All laser-treated quadrants displayed a significant delay in hair regrowth compared to control nontreated quadrants at postoperative week 1 and months 1 and 3. Hair counts were reduced by 66% at 1 month, 27% at 3 months, and 4% at 6 months. No significant differences in clinical efficacy or side effect profiles were observed between treatment quadrants, yet a trend towards less post-treatment erythema and hyperpigmentation was noted with the 20 ms pulse duration.
CONCLUSIONS: Equivalent long-term hair removal for up to 6 months was achieved with the long-pulsed alexandrite laser at 5, 10, and 20 ms pulse durations at an average fluence of 18 J/cm2. Side effects were limited and transient.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10406473     DOI: 10.1002/(sici)1096-9101(1999)24:5<332::aid-lsm3>3.0.co;2-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Lasers Surg Med        ISSN: 0196-8092            Impact factor:   4.025


  6 in total

Review 1.  A review of the adverse effects of laser hair removal.

Authors:  S P R Lim; S W Lanigan
Journal:  Lasers Med Sci       Date:  2006-07-01       Impact factor: 3.161

2.  A study on the development of a robot-assisted automatic laser hair removal system.

Authors:  Hyoung-Woo Lim; Sungwoo Park; Seungwoo Noh; Dong-Hun Lee; Chiyul Yoon; Wooseok Koh; Youdan Kim; Jin Ho Chung; Hee Chan Kim; Sungwan Kim
Journal:  Photomed Laser Surg       Date:  2014-10-24       Impact factor: 2.796

3.  [New approach to photoepilation. Diode laser with SHR (Super Hair Removal) compared to alexandrite laser].

Authors:  S Hammes; H M Ockenfels; H-R Metelmann; C Raulin; S Karsai
Journal:  Hautarzt       Date:  2010-10       Impact factor: 0.751

4.  Six-month follow-up multicenter prospective study of 368 patients, phototypes III to V, on epilation efficacy using an 810-nm diode laser at low fluence.

Authors:  Josefina Royo; Fernándo Urdiales; Javier Moreno; Marwan Al-Zarouni; Paloma Cornejo; Mario A Trelles
Journal:  Lasers Med Sci       Date:  2010-10-28       Impact factor: 3.161

5.  Comparison of Alexandrite and Diode Lasers for Hair Removal in Dark and Medium Skin: Which is Better?

Authors:  Farhad Hamad Mustafa; Mohamad Suhimi Jaafar; Asaad Hamid Ismail; Kussay Nugamesh Mutter
Journal:  J Lasers Med Sci       Date:  2014

6.  Anterior uveitis following eyebrow epilation with alexandrite laser.

Authors:  Yunus Karabela; Mustafa Eliaçık
Journal:  Int Med Case Rep J       Date:  2015-09-07
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.