Literature DB >> 10406378

Handling of scientific dishonesty in the Nordic countries. National Committees on Scientific Dishonesty in the Nordic Countries.

M Nylenna1, D Andersen, G Dahlquist, M Sarvas, A Aakvaag.   

Abstract

Despite a widely recognised need, most countries still have no coherent system to deal with scientific misconduct. Committees have been established by the national medical research councils in Denmark (1992), Norway (1994), and Sweden (1997), and by the Ministry of Education in Finland (1994), to deal with scientific misconduct--ie, to initiate preventive measures, to investigate alleged cases, or both. Each committee includes both scientifically and legally qualified members. The employing institutions are responsible for possible sanctions or punishments. So far, 47 cases have been accepted for investigation, the majority (25) being Danish. Disputed authorship was the most frequent reason for investigation. Junior researchers made complaints in only three of the investigated cases. Investigations have been completed in 37 cases; in nine cases, dishonesty was revealed--two of them were related to the same researchers. Cooperation between the four Nordic committees has shown close agreement on specific issues and cases, despite minor differences in definitions, organisation, and procedures.

Keywords:  Biomedical and Behavioral Research; Empirical Approach

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10406378     DOI: 10.1016/s0140-6736(98)07133-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Lancet        ISSN: 0140-6736            Impact factor:   79.321


  10 in total

1.  Safeguarding good scientific practice in Europe.

Authors:  Xavier Bosch
Journal:  EMBO Rep       Date:  2010-03-19       Impact factor: 8.807

2.  The legacy of the Hwang case: research misconduct in biosciences.

Authors:  Péter Kakuk
Journal:  Sci Eng Ethics       Date:  2009-02-27       Impact factor: 3.525

3.  Prevalence of scientific misconduct among a group of researchers in Nigeria.

Authors:  Patrick Okonta; Theresa Rossouw
Journal:  Dev World Bioeth       Date:  2012-09-20       Impact factor: 2.294

Review 4.  Interventions to prevent misconduct and promote integrity in research and publication.

Authors:  Ana Marusic; Elizabeth Wager; Ana Utrobicic; Hannah R Rothstein; Dario Sambunjak
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2016-04-04

Review 5.  Research misconduct: the poisoning of the well.

Authors:  Richard Smith
Journal:  J R Soc Med       Date:  2006-05       Impact factor: 18.000

6.  Pharmacy Practice suffered a plagiarism case.

Authors:  Fernando Fernandez-Llimos
Journal:  Pharm Pract (Granada)       Date:  2012-01

7.  Authorship: attitudes and practice among Norwegian researchers.

Authors:  Magne Nylenna; Frode Fagerbakk; Peter Kierulf
Journal:  BMC Med Ethics       Date:  2014-07-02       Impact factor: 2.652

Review 8.  The visibility of scientific misconduct: A review of the literature on retracted journal articles.

Authors:  Felicitas Hesselmann; Verena Graf; Marion Schmidt; Martin Reinhart
Journal:  Curr Sociol       Date:  2016-10-13

Review 9.  Publication ethics: Role and responsibility of authors.

Authors:  Shubha Singhal; Bhupinder Singh Kalra
Journal:  Indian J Gastroenterol       Date:  2021-01-22

10.  Scientific dishonesty--a nationwide survey of doctoral students in Norway.

Authors:  Bjørn Hofmann; Anne Ingeborg Myhr; Søren Holm
Journal:  BMC Med Ethics       Date:  2013-01-05       Impact factor: 2.652

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.