Literature DB >> 10406245

Prediction of resource utilization and case cost for acute nonvariceal upper gastrointestinal hemorrhage at a Canadian community hospital.

J K Marshall1, S M Collins, A Gafni.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Upper gastrointestinal hemorrhage (UGIH) is common, and thus imposes a substantial burden on health care resources. We describe resource utilization and cost for management of acute nonvariceal UGIH, and studied their variation among population subgroups.
METHODS: Resource utilization and direct medical case costs were extracted for consecutive admissions for nonvariceal UGIH at a large community hospital in southern Ontario through chart review and adaptation of an administrative case cost database. Univariate and multiple regression models were then developed to identify independent demographic predictors of case cost and length of stay.
RESULTS: Among 116 eligible admissions the average length of stay and case cost were 4.26 days and Can$2690, respectively (Can$1 = US$0.70). Both cost and length of stay demonstrated significant univariate relationships with age, comorbid illness, prior peptic ulcer disease (PUD), and prior UGIH. Age and prior PUD persisted as independent predictors in multiple regression models. An inverse transformation of total case cost allowed these variables to explain 26% of the total variance.
CONCLUSIONS: Resource utilization for management of acute nonvariceal UGIH at a Canadian community hospital varies substantially among population subgroups, but correlates independently with age and prior ulcer history. Careful attention must be paid to practice environments and demographic profiles before economic models of strategies to prevent or treat UGIH are applied to specific subpopulations.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10406245     DOI: 10.1111/j.1572-0241.1999.01215.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol        ISSN: 0002-9270            Impact factor:   10.864


  7 in total

1.  Endoscopic findings in patients with upper gastrointestinal bleeding clinically classified into three risk groups prior to endoscopy.

Authors:  Leonardo Tammaro; Maria-Carla Di Paolo; Angelo Zullo; Cesare Hassan; Sergio Morini; Sebastiano Caliendo; Lorella Pallotta
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2008-08-28       Impact factor: 5.742

2.  Is the AIMS65 score useful in predicting outcomes in peptic ulcer bleeding?

Authors:  Sung Hoon Jung; Jung Hwan Oh; Hye Yeon Lee; Joon Won Jeong; Se Eun Go; Chan Ran You; Eun Jung Jeon; Sang Wook Choi
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2014-02-21       Impact factor: 5.742

Review 3.  Bleeding peptic ulcer in the elderly: risk factors and prevention strategies.

Authors:  Angelo Zullo; Cesare Hassan; Salvatore M A Campo; Sergio Morini
Journal:  Drugs Aging       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 3.923

4.  Outcomes of Propofol Sedation During Emergency Endoscopy Performed for Upper Gastrointestinal Bleeding.

Authors:  Chan Hyuk Park; Dong Soo Han; Jae Yoon Jeong; Chang Soo Eun; Kyo-Sang Yoo; Yong Cheol Jeon; Joo Hyun Sohn
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2015-11-05       Impact factor: 3.199

5.  Mortality associated with gastrointestinal bleeding events: Comparing short-term clinical outcomes of patients hospitalized for upper GI bleeding and acute myocardial infarction in a US managed care setting.

Authors:  C Mel Wilcox; Byron L Cryer; Henry J Henk; Victoria Zarotsky; Gergana Zlateva
Journal:  Clin Exp Gastroenterol       Date:  2009-03-19

Review 6.  Etiology and outcome of acute gastrointestinal bleeding in iran:a review article.

Authors:  Mohsen Masoodi; Mehdi Saberifiroozi
Journal:  Middle East J Dig Dis       Date:  2012-10

7.  Clinical Profile and Endoscopic Findings in Patients with Upper Gastrointestinal Bleed Attending a Tertiary Care Hospital: A Descriptive Cross-sectional Study.

Authors:  Subash Bhattarai
Journal:  JNMA J Nepal Med Assoc       Date:  2020-06-30       Impact factor: 0.406

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.