Literature DB >> 10405885

Biomedical applications of polyurethanes: a review of past promises, present realities, and a vibrant future.

R J Zdrahala1, I J Zdrahala.   

Abstract

Polyurethanes, having extensive structure/property diversity, are one of the most bio- and blood-compatible materials known today. These materials played a major role in the development of many medical devices ranging from catheters to total artificial heart. Properties such as durability, elasticity, elastomer-like character, fatigue resistance, compliance, and acceptance or tolerance in the body during the healing, became often associated with polyurethanes. Furthermore, propensity for bulk and surface modification via hydrophilic/hydrophobic balance or by attachments of biologically active species such as anticoagulants or biorecognizable groups are possible via chemical groups typical for polyurethane structure. These modifications are designed to mediate and enhance the acceptance and healing of the device or implant. Many innovative processing technologies are used to fabricate functional devices, feeling and often behaving like natural tissue. The hydrolytically unstable polyester polyurethanes were replaced by more resistant but oxidation-sensitive polyether polyols based polyurethanes and their clones containing silicone and other modifying polymeric intermediates. Chronic in vivo instability, however, observed on prolonged implantation, became a major roadblock for many applications. Presently, utilization of more oxidation resistant polycarbonate polyols as soft segments, in combination with antioxidants such as Vitamin E, offer materials which can endure in the body for several years. The applications cover cardiovascular devices, artificial organs, tissue replacement and augmentation, performance enhancing coatings and many others. In situ polymerized, cross-linked systems could extend this biodurability even further. The future will expand this field by revisiting chemically-controlled biodegradation, in combination with a mini-version of RIM technology and minimally invasive surgical procedures, to form, in vivo, a scaffold, by delivery of reacting materials to the specific site in the body and polymerizing the mass in situ. This scaffold will provide anchor for tissue regeneration via cell attachment, proliferation, control of inflammation, and healing.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10405885     DOI: 10.1177/088532829901400104

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Biomater Appl        ISSN: 0885-3282            Impact factor:   2.646


  46 in total

1.  Highly tunable elastomeric silk biomaterials.

Authors:  Benjamin P Partlow; Craig W Hanna; Jelena Rnjak-Kovacina; Jodie E Moreau; Matthew B Applegate; Kelly A Burke; Benedetto Marelli; Alexander N Mitropoulos; Fiorenzo G Omenetto; David L Kaplan
Journal:  Adv Funct Mater       Date:  2014-08-06       Impact factor: 18.808

Review 2.  Basement membranes and artificial substrates in cell transplantation.

Authors:  Carl Sheridan; Rachel Williams; Ian Grierson
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2003-11-20       Impact factor: 3.117

3.  Development of biotube vascular grafts incorporating cuffs for easy implantation.

Authors:  Taiji Watanabe; Keiichi Kanda; Hatsue Ishibashi-Ueda; Hitoshi Yaku; Yasuhide Nakayama
Journal:  J Artif Organs       Date:  2007-03-23       Impact factor: 1.731

4.  Surface characterization of biopolyurethanes based on cellulose derivatives.

Authors:  Doina Macocinschi; Daniela Filip; Maria Butnaru; Cristina Daniela Dimitriu
Journal:  J Mater Sci Mater Med       Date:  2008-11-20       Impact factor: 3.896

5.  Polyurethanes as potential substrates for sub-retinal retinal pigment epithelial cell transplantation.

Authors:  R L Williams; Y Krishna; S Dixon; A Haridas; I Grierson; C Sheridan
Journal:  J Mater Sci Mater Med       Date:  2005-12       Impact factor: 3.896

Review 6.  In Vivo Chemical Sensors: Role of Biocompatibility on Performance and Utility.

Authors:  Robert J Soto; Jackson R Hall; Micah D Brown; James B Taylor; Mark H Schoenfisch
Journal:  Anal Chem       Date:  2016-11-21       Impact factor: 6.986

7.  Design Considerations for Silica-Particle-Doped Nitric-Oxide-Releasing Polyurethane Glucose Biosensor Membranes.

Authors:  Robert J Soto; Jonathon B Schofield; Shaylyn E Walter; Maggie J Malone-Povolny; Mark H Schoenfisch
Journal:  ACS Sens       Date:  2016-12-15       Impact factor: 7.711

8.  Segmented biopolyurethanes for medical applications.

Authors:  Doina Macocinschi; Daniela Filip; Stelian Vlad; Mariana Cristea; Maria Butnaru
Journal:  J Mater Sci Mater Med       Date:  2009-03-19       Impact factor: 3.896

9.  Blood compatibility of polyurethane immobilized with acrylic acid and plasma grafting sulfonic acid.

Authors:  Qiang Lv; Chuanbao Cao; Hesun Zhu
Journal:  J Mater Sci Mater Med       Date:  2004-05       Impact factor: 3.896

Review 10.  Three-dimensional culture of human embryonic stem cell derived hepatic endoderm and its role in bioartificial liver construction.

Authors:  Ruchi Sharma; Sebastian Greenhough; Claire N Medine; David C Hay
Journal:  J Biomed Biotechnol       Date:  2010-02-08
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.