BACKGROUND: Worldwide, an estimated 78 million people are disabled each year because of unintentional injuries and about 3 million die. The WHO Safe Community model is a framework for community-based injury prevention programmes. The aim of this study is to evaluate the outcome on health care utilization of a Safe Community programme. METHODS: The incidence of injuries treated at health care facilities in an intervention municipality (pop. 41,000) was compared to the injury incidence in a control municipality (pop. 26,000). The incidence was recorded immediately before and one year after programme implementation from registrations made during all first-contact health care visits and from examination of hospital discharge registers. RESULTS: The incidence of health care treated injuries in the intervention area had decreased by 13% (95% CI: 9-16%) from 119 (95% CI: 115-122) per 1000 population-years to 104 (95% CI: 101-107). In the control area, the corresponding injury incidences were 104 (95% CI: 100-108) and 106 (95% CI: 102-109). The hospital-treated injuries in the intervention area decreased by 15% (95% CI: 7-24%) from 19 (95% CI: 17-20) per 1000 population-years to 16 (95% CI: 15-17), while in the control area, the incidences remained at 13 (95% CI: 11-14) per 1000 population-years. Utilization of acute care in the intervention area for reasons other than injuries increased by 8% (95% CI: 6-10%), while in the control area, the number of visits did not show significant change. CONCLUSION: This first controlled evaluation showed that an injury prevention programme based on local action groups can significantly reduce injuries requiring health care in a community. Local prevention can provide a complement to national level campaigns.
BACKGROUND: Worldwide, an estimated 78 million people are disabled each year because of unintentional injuries and about 3 million die. The WHO Safe Community model is a framework for community-based injury prevention programmes. The aim of this study is to evaluate the outcome on health care utilization of a Safe Community programme. METHODS: The incidence of injuries treated at health care facilities in an intervention municipality (pop. 41,000) was compared to the injury incidence in a control municipality (pop. 26,000). The incidence was recorded immediately before and one year after programme implementation from registrations made during all first-contact health care visits and from examination of hospital discharge registers. RESULTS: The incidence of health care treated injuries in the intervention area had decreased by 13% (95% CI: 9-16%) from 119 (95% CI: 115-122) per 1000 population-years to 104 (95% CI: 101-107). In the control area, the corresponding injury incidences were 104 (95% CI: 100-108) and 106 (95% CI: 102-109). The hospital-treated injuries in the intervention area decreased by 15% (95% CI: 7-24%) from 19 (95% CI: 17-20) per 1000 population-years to 16 (95% CI: 15-17), while in the control area, the incidences remained at 13 (95% CI: 11-14) per 1000 population-years. Utilization of acute care in the intervention area for reasons other than injuries increased by 8% (95% CI: 6-10%), while in the control area, the number of visits did not show significant change. CONCLUSION: This first controlled evaluation showed that an injury prevention programme based on local action groups can significantly reduce injuries requiring health care in a community. Local prevention can provide a complement to national level campaigns.