Literature DB >> 10405736

Transrectal versus transvaginal abscess drainage: survey of patient tolerance and effect on activities of daily living.

D M Hovsepian1, J R Steele, C S Skinner, E S Malden.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To evaluate patient perception of pain related to transrectal and transvaginal drainage and the catheter's effect on activities of daily living.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: From July 1993 to August 1997, 22 male and 40 female patients (mean age, 41 years; age range, 4-80 years) underwent transrectal or transvaginal aspiration or drainage. Fifty-seven drainages were performed. In a follow-up survey, patients were asked to score pain experienced during the procedure and afterward on a scale of 1-10 and to rate the effect of the catheter on their activities of daily living.
RESULTS: Twenty-two patients participated in the telephone survey. For those able to recall the insertion procedure, the mean pain score was 3.2 for transrectal and 5.9 for transvaginal drainage. Mean indwelling catheter pain was 1.6 for transrectal and 4.8 for transvaginal drainage. Pain after removal was 1.4 for transrectal and 2.3 for transvaginal drainage. Only one patient with a transrectal catheter reported severe limitation (bowel movement), with no reports of any serious effect on urinating, bathing, sitting, or walking. Transvaginally placed catheters caused marked limitation in all categories and were more painful than transrectal catheters (P < .05).
CONCLUSION: Of the transrectal and transvaginal approaches, transrectal is better tolerated.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10405736     DOI: 10.1148/radiology.212.1.r99jl23159

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiology        ISSN: 0033-8419            Impact factor:   11.105


  4 in total

Review 1.  Computed tomography-guided percutaneous abscess drainage in coloproctology: review of the literature.

Authors:  R Golfieri; A Cappelli
Journal:  Tech Coloproctol       Date:  2007-08-03       Impact factor: 3.781

2.  Complications of percutaneous fluid drainage.

Authors:  Jonathan Lorenz; Jamie Lee Thomas
Journal:  Semin Intervent Radiol       Date:  2006-06       Impact factor: 1.513

3.  Transrectal and transvaginal catheter drainages and aspirations for management of pelvic fluid collections: technique, technical success rates, and outcomes in 150 patients.

Authors:  David H Ballard; Michael C Gates; Alireza Hamidian Jahromi; Daniel V Harper; Daniel V Do; Horacio B D'Agostino
Journal:  Abdom Radiol (NY)       Date:  2019-07

4.  Transanal endoscopic microsurgery: long-term experience, indication expansion, and technical improvements.

Authors:  Daniel Léonard; Jean-François Colin; Christophe Remue; Jacques Jamart; Alex Kartheuser
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2011-09-05       Impact factor: 4.584

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.