Literature DB >> 10405132

FDG PET to evaluate combined intra-arterial chemotherapy and radiotherapy of head and neck neoplasms.

Y Kitagawa1, N Sadato, H Azuma, T Ogasawara, M Yoshida, Y Ishii, Y Yonekura.   

Abstract

UNLABELLED: We evaluated the effectiveness of combined intra-arterial chemotherapy and radiotherapy on head and neck squamous cell carcinomas using fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) PET.
METHODS: Fifteen patients with squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck were included in the study. Fourteen patients completed the treatment regimen and underwent FDG PET before and 4 wk after chemoradiotherapy. One patient underwent pretreatment FDG PET only. The pretreatment and post-treatment PET images were compared with clinical and histopathologic evaluations of the effects of chemoradiotherapy. For the quantitative evaluation of regional radioactivity, standardized uptake values (SUVs) with an uptake period of 50 min were used.
RESULTS: Before treatment, FDG PET detected neoplasms in all 15 patients. The overall clinical response rate to chemoradiotherapy in the 14 patients who were imaged before and after treatment was 100%. Before treatment, the neoplastic lesions showed high SUVs (mean 7.77 mg/mL), which significantly decreased after therapy (3.62 mg/mL, P < 0.01). Lesions with higher pretreatment SUVs (> 7 mg/mL) showed residual viable tumor cells after the treatment in 3 of 8 patients, whereas those with lower SUVs (< 7 mg/mL, 6 patients) were successfully treated. Three of seven tumors with post-treatment SUVs > 4 mg/mL had viable tumor cells, whereas all tumors (7/7) with post-treatment SUVs < 4 mg/mL showed no viable cells. With concomitant chemoradiotherapy monitored by FDG PET, 5 patients avoided surgery entirely, and the remaining 9 patients underwent a reduced form of surgery.
CONCLUSION: FDG PET is useful in evaluating the effects of combined chemotherapy and radiotherapy in patients with head and neck carcinoma. Pretreatment FDG PET is useful in predicting the response to treatment, and post-treatment FDG PET can evaluate residual viable cells. Hence, FDG PET is a valuable tool in the treatment of head and neck tumors.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10405132

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Nucl Med        ISSN: 0161-5505            Impact factor:   10.057


  14 in total

1.  Increased glucose metabolism by FDG-PET correlates with reduced tumor angiogenesis in oral squamous cell carcinoma.

Authors:  Mikiko Nakamura; Yoshimasa Kitagawa; Yutaka Yamazaki; Hironobu Hata; Motoko Kotsuji; Yasuhisa Fujibayashi; Hidehiko Okazawa; Yoshiharu Yonekura; Kazuo Sano
Journal:  Odontology       Date:  2011-05-13       Impact factor: 2.634

Review 2.  Gene therapy imaging in patients for oncological applications.

Authors:  Iván Peñuelas; Uwe Haberkorn; Shahriar Yaghoubi; Sanjiv S Gambhir
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2005-12       Impact factor: 9.236

3.  Advantage of FMISO-PET over FDG-PET for predicting histological response to preoperative chemotherapy in patients with oral squamous cell carcinoma.

Authors:  Jun Sato; Yoshimasa Kitagawa; Yutaka Yamazaki; Hironobu Hata; Takuya Asaka; Masaaki Miyakoshi; Shozo Okamoto; Tohru Shiga; Masanobu Shindoh; Yuji Kuge; Nagara Tamaki
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2014-05-28       Impact factor: 9.236

4.  18F-FDG versus 11C-choline PET/CT for the imaging of advanced head and neck cancer after combined intra-arterial chemotherapy and radiotherapy: the time period during which PET/CT can reliably detect non-recurrence.

Authors:  Kimiteru Ito; Jyunkichi Yokoyama; Kazuo Kubota; Miyako Morooka; Michio Shiibashi; Hiroshi Matsuda
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2010-03-20       Impact factor: 9.236

5.  Positron emission tomography-CT prediction of occult nodal metastasis in recurrent laryngeal cancer.

Authors:  Andrew Rosko; Andrew Birkeland; Andrew Shuman; Mark Prince; Carol Bradford; Gregory Wolf; Francis Worden; Avraham Eisbruch; Ashok Srinivasan; Ka Kit Wong; Matthew E Spector
Journal:  Head Neck       Date:  2017-02-25       Impact factor: 3.147

6.  Prediction and monitoring of the response to chemoradiotherapy in oral squamous cell carcinomas using a pharmacokinetic analysis based on the dynamic contrast-enhanced MR imaging findings.

Authors:  Toru Chikui; Shintaro Kawano; Toshiyuki Kawazu; Masamitsu Hatakenaka; Syouzou Koga; Masahiro Ohga; Yoshio Matsuo; Syunya Sunami; Tsuyoshi Sugiura; Yoshiyuki Shioyama; Makoto Obara; Kazunori Yoshiura
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2011-03-12       Impact factor: 5.315

Review 7.  Glucose deprivation-induced metabolic oxidative stress and cancer therapy.

Authors:  Andrean L Simons; David M Mattson; Ken Dornfeld; Douglas R Spitz
Journal:  J Cancer Res Ther       Date:  2009-09       Impact factor: 1.805

8.  Benign ulceration as a manifestation of soft tissue radiation necrosis: imaging findings.

Authors:  J M Debnam; A S Garden; L E Ginsberg
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2008-01-17       Impact factor: 3.825

9.  FDG-PET/CT imaging biomarkers in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma.

Authors:  Vasavi Paidpally; Alin Chirindel; Stella Lam; Nishant Agrawal; Harry Quon; Rathan M Subramaniam
Journal:  Imaging Med       Date:  2012-12

10.  Utility of the Midface Degloving Approach for Extended Exposure in Maxillary Pathologies.

Authors:  Thomas Zachariah; R S Neelakandan
Journal:  J Maxillofac Oral Surg       Date:  2019-09-18
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.