Literature DB >> 10405060

V--Y flap for perineal reconstruction following modified approach to vulvectomy in vulvar cancer.

F Carramaschi1, M L Ramos, A C Nisida, M C Ferreira, J A Pinotti.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate a simple reconstructive procedure used in combination with a modified oncological approach to the treatment of invasive vulvar cancer. Local and systemic morbidity, length of hospital stay, local recurrence, and mortality were evaluated.
METHODS: Between September 1995 and January 1997, 19 patients underwent radical vulvectomy and inguinal lymphadenectomy with a modified oncological approach. The modified approach consisted of a triple incision: two inguinal incisions, shorter and following force lines of the groin, and a third incision around the vulvar lesion. Vulvectomy included a 2-cm safety margin around the tumor, based on clinical examination and anatomical-pathological frozen sections of the specimen. This procedure was always followed by perineal reconstruction with V-Y flaps by the plastic surgery team. Median follow-up was 12 months. The complication rate and lengths of hospital stay were evaluated and compared with those in a similar group in which radical vulvectomy was performed associated with two long longitudinal incisions in the groin. The data were statistically analyzed.
RESULTS: The perineal and inguinal dehiscence rates in group A (traditional approach) were 68.4% and 78.94%, respectively. The same rates in group B (modified approach), were 10.5% and 36.84%, respectively. Mean hospital stay was 39.5 days in group A (traditional) vs. 14.0 days in group B (modified). At 30 months' median follow-up, the rate of local recurrence in group A (traditional) was 42.0%; at 12 months' median follow-up, local recurrence in group B (modified) was 26.3%.
CONCLUSIONS: In this study, the use of V-Y flaps in combination with a modified oncological approach significantly reduced local complication rates and lengths of hospital stay, while observing oncological principles.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10405060     DOI: 10.1016/s0020-7292(99)00016-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Gynaecol Obstet        ISSN: 0020-7292            Impact factor:   3.561


  7 in total

1.  Internal pudendal perforator artery-based gull wing flap for vulvovaginal 3D reconstruction after tumour excision: a new flap.

Authors:  Hyun H Han; Daiwon Jun; Bommie F Seo; Suk-Ho Moon; Deuk Y Oh; Sang T Ahn; Jong-Won Rhie
Journal:  Int Wound J       Date:  2015-01-14       Impact factor: 3.315

2.  Reconstruction of acquired perineovulvar defects: a proposal of sequence.

Authors:  J Joris Hage; Marc van Beurden
Journal:  Semin Plast Surg       Date:  2011-05       Impact factor: 2.314

Review 3.  Reconstruction of perineal defects.

Authors:  M Mughal; R J Baker; A Muneer; A Mosahebi
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  2013-11       Impact factor: 1.951

4.  Surgical therapy of vulvar cancer: how to choose the correct reconstruction?

Authors:  Stefano Gentileschi; Maria Servillo; Giorgia Garganese; Simona Fragomeni; Francesca De Bonis; Giovanni Scambia; Marzia Salgarello
Journal:  J Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2016-07-12       Impact factor: 4.401

5.  New Keystone flap application in vulvo-perineal reconstructive surgery: A case series.

Authors:  Michele Peiretti; Elisabetta Corvetto; Giorgio Candotti; Stefano Angioni; Andrea Figus; Valerio Mais
Journal:  Gynecol Oncol Rep       Date:  2019-10-18

Review 6.  Feasibility and Safety of Video Endoscopic Inguinal Lymphadenectomy in Vulvar Cancer: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Chai-E Liu; Yan Lu; De-Sheng Yao
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-10-23       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Utilizing V-Y fasciocutaneous advancement flaps for vulvar reconstruction.

Authors:  Lauren C Hand; Talia M Maas; Nadia Baka; Rebecca J Mercier; Patrick J Greaney; Norman G Rosenblum; Christine H Kim
Journal:  Gynecol Oncol Rep       Date:  2018-08-24
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.