Literature DB >> 10404976

Imaging and force-distance analysis of human fibroblasts in vitro by atomic force microscopy.

G R Bushell1, C Cahill, F M Clarke, C T Gibson, S Myhra, G S Watson.   

Abstract

The structure of human fibroblasts have been characterised in vitro by atomic force microscopy (AFM) operated in the imaging or in the force versus distance (F-d) modes. The choice of cell substrate is important to ensure good adhesion. Of greater significance in the context of AFM analysis, is the observation that the substrate affects the imaging conditions for in vitro analysis of live cells. For instance, very rarely will glass coverslips lead to acceptable outcomes (i.e., resolved cytoskeletal structure). Activated tissue culture dishes, on the other hand, promote conditions that routinely result in good quality images. Those conditions are then unaffected by adoption of relatively high force loadings (more than 10 nN), large fields of view (100 x 100 microm2) and high scan speeds (up to ca. 200 microm/sec), all of which exceed values recommended in the literature. Plasma membranes are fragile in the context of AFM analysis (F-d analysis gives an equivalent Young's Modulus of ca. 5 kPa). However, the present work suggests that fragility per se need not be a problem, rather it is the adhesive interactions with the tip, which under some circumstances may exceed 20 nN, that are the source of poor imaging conditions. The present results, being supported by a qualitative model, suggest that the activated substrate acts as a preferential scavenger of cellular debris thus preventing the tip from biofouling, and will therefore promote low adhesion between tip and membrane. Good imaging conditions provide non-destructive in vitro information about cytoskeletal structure and dynamics, as shown in two examples concerned with cytochalasin treatment and with the MTT assay.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10404976     DOI: 10.1002/(sici)1097-0320(19990701)36:3<254::aid-cyto16>3.0.co;2-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cytometry        ISSN: 0196-4763


  9 in total

1.  Necking and failure of constrained 3D microtissues induced by cellular tension.

Authors:  Hailong Wang; Alexander A Svoronos; Thomas Boudou; Mahmut Selman Sakar; Jacquelyn Youssef Schell; Jeffrey R Morgan; Christopher S Chen; Vivek B Shenoy
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2013-12-09       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Macrophage adhesion on fibronectin evokes an increase in the elastic property of the cell membrane and cytoskeleton: an atomic force microscopy study.

Authors:  Samuel T Souza; Laís C Agra; Cássio E A Santos; Emiliano Barreto; Jandir M Hickmann; Eduardo J S Fonseca
Journal:  Eur Biophys J       Date:  2014-10-19       Impact factor: 1.733

3.  Tissue section AFM: In situ ultrastructural imaging of native biomolecules.

Authors:  Helen K Graham; Nigel W Hodson; Judith A Hoyland; Sarah J Millward-Sadler; David Garrod; Anthea Scothern; Christopher E M Griffiths; Rachel E B Watson; Thomas R Cox; Janine T Erler; Andrew W Trafford; Michael J Sherratt
Journal:  Matrix Biol       Date:  2010-02-06       Impact factor: 11.583

4.  Myotubes differentiate optimally on substrates with tissue-like stiffness: pathological implications for soft or stiff microenvironments.

Authors:  Adam J Engler; Maureen A Griffin; Shamik Sen; Carsten G Bönnemann; H Lee Sweeney; Dennis E Discher
Journal:  J Cell Biol       Date:  2004-09-13       Impact factor: 10.539

5.  Fast, multi-frequency, and quantitative nanomechanical mapping of live cells using the atomic force microscope.

Authors:  Alexander X Cartagena-Rivera; Wen-Horng Wang; Robert L Geahlen; Arvind Raman
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2015-06-29       Impact factor: 4.379

6.  Measurement of in-plane elasticity of live cell layers using a pressure sensor embedded microfluidic device.

Authors:  Chien-Han Lin; Chien-Kai Wang; Yu-An Chen; Chien-Chung Peng; Wei-Hao Liao; Yi-Chung Tung
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2016-11-04       Impact factor: 4.379

7.  An ultra-sensitive biophysical risk assessment of light effect on skin cells.

Authors:  Devasier Bennet; Buddolla Viswanath; Sanghyo Kim; Jeong Ho An
Journal:  Oncotarget       Date:  2017-07-18

Review 8.  Biomechanical Properties of Cancer Cells.

Authors:  Gaël Runel; Noémie Lopez-Ramirez; Julien Chlasta; Ingrid Masse
Journal:  Cells       Date:  2021-04-13       Impact factor: 6.600

9.  Insulin-producing cells could not mimic the physiological regulation of insulin secretion performed by pancreatic beta cells.

Authors:  Qiping Shi; Simin Luo; Haiying Jia; Lie Feng; Xiaohua Lu; Lixin Zhou; Jiye Cai
Journal:  Nanoscale Res Lett       Date:  2013-02-19       Impact factor: 4.703

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.