Literature DB >> 10404576

Management of nonspecific low back pain by physiotherapists in Britain and Ireland. A descriptive questionnaire of current clinical practice.

N E Foster1, K A Thompson, G D Baxter, J M Allen.   

Abstract

STUDY
DESIGN: A descriptive questionnaire of chartered physiotherapists.
OBJECTIVE: To investigate current physiotherapeutic management of low back pain throughout Britain and Ireland. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Physiotherapists play a key role in low back pain management. Although clinical guidelines for best practice have been developed recently, there has been no large-scale attempt to describe current physiotherapeutic treatment approaches within Britain or Ireland.
METHODS: After semi-structured interviews (n = 6) and two pilot studies (n = 77) were done, postal questionnaires were distributed to four regional cluster samples of the membership of two physiotherapy professional organizations (n = 2654). After two mailings, a random sample of 90 nonresponders were followed up. Data were analyzed using the Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS Ltd., Woking, Surrey, UK), and precision of the survey estimates was assessed by calculation of sampling errors and intraclass correlation coefficients for cluster sampling.
RESULTS: Results were received from 1548 therapists (total response rate, 58.3%); of these, 813 reported that they were practicing in settings in which they treated patients with low back pain. Analysis of the results indicated the overall popularity of the Maitland mobilization and McKenzie approaches among physiotherapists. Although exercise per se was mentioned frequently by respondents, a marked difference in opinion among therapists regarding the optimal type of exercise for low back pain was obvious. Little evidence was demonstrated of the use of manipulation, fitness programs, or multidisciplinary efforts involving behavioral and physical aspects of treatment. Commonly used methods of electrotherapy were interferential therapy, ultrasound, pulsed short-wave diathermy, and transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation.
CONCLUSIONS: The results of this study emphasize the need to evaluate further and improve the dissemination of findings regarding the effectiveness of specific physiotherapy approaches for low back pain management.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10404576     DOI: 10.1097/00007632-199907010-00011

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)        ISSN: 0362-2436            Impact factor:   3.468


  48 in total

1.  Deep water running and general practice in primary care for non-specific low back pain versus general practice alone: randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  A I Cuesta-Vargas; N Adams; J A Salazar; A Belles; S Hazañas; M Arroyo-Morales
Journal:  Clin Rheumatol       Date:  2012-03-29       Impact factor: 2.980

Review 2.  Managing low back pain in the primary care setting: the know-do gap.

Authors:  N Ann Scott; Carmen Moga; Christa Harstall
Journal:  Pain Res Manag       Date:  2010 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 3.037

3.  IMPaCT Back study protocol. Implementation of subgrouping for targeted treatment systems for low back pain patients in primary care: a prospective population-based sequential comparison.

Authors:  Nadine E Foster; Ricky Mullis; Julie Young; Carol Doyle; Martyn Lewis; David Whitehurst; Elaine M Hay
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2010-08-20       Impact factor: 2.362

4.  The effects of weightbath traction hydrotherapy as a component of complex physical therapy in disorders of the cervical and lumbar spine: a controlled pilot study with follow-up.

Authors:  Mihály Oláh; Levente Molnár; József Dobai; Csaba Oláh; Judit Fehér; Tamás Bender
Journal:  Rheumatol Int       Date:  2008-01-12       Impact factor: 2.631

5.  Manual correction of an acute lumbar lateral shift: maintenance of correction and rehabilitation: a case report with video.

Authors:  Mark Laslett
Journal:  J Man Manip Ther       Date:  2009

6.  Prescriptive clinical prediction rules in back pain research: a systematic review.

Authors:  Stephen May; Richard Rosedale
Journal:  J Man Manip Ther       Date:  2009

7.  Physiotherapy and low back pain in the injured worker: an examination of current practice during the subacute phase of healing.

Authors:  Katherine Harman; Anne Fenety; Alison Hoens; James Crouse; Bev Padfield
Journal:  Physiother Can       Date:  2009-05-12       Impact factor: 1.037

8.  The cost-effectiveness of a treatment-based classification system for low back pain: design of a randomised controlled trial and economic evaluation.

Authors:  Adri T Apeldoorn; Raymond W Ostelo; Hans van Helvoirt; Julie M Fritz; Henrika C W de Vet; Maurits W van Tulder
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2010-03-26       Impact factor: 2.362

9.  Physiotherapists and use of low back pain guidelines: a qualitative study of the barriers and facilitators.

Authors:  Anne-Marie Côté; Marie-José Durand; Michel Tousignant; Stéphane Poitras
Journal:  J Occup Rehabil       Date:  2009-02-14

10.  A walking programme and a supervised exercise class versus usual physiotherapy for chronic low back pain: a single-blinded randomised controlled trial. (The Supervised Walking In comparison to Fitness Training for Back Pain (SWIFT) Trial).

Authors:  Deirdre A Hurley; Grainne O'Donoghue; Mark A Tully; Jennifer Klaber Moffett; Willem van Mechelen; Leslie Daly; Colin Ag Boreham; Suzanne M McDonough
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2009-07-02       Impact factor: 2.362

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.