Literature DB >> 10404337

In-vitro antibacterial activity of levofloxacin against hospital isolates: a multicentre study.

C J Soussy1, M Cluzel, M C Ploy, M D Kitzis, C Morel, A Bryskier, P Courvalin.   

Abstract

The objective of this study was to evaluate the activity of the fluoroquinolone, levofloxacin, against hospital isolates of bacteria. MICs of levofloxacin were determined for 2154 strains by agar dilution. Breakpoints for susceptibility testing were calculated using the agar diffusion technique with 5 micrograms discs. The activity of levofloxacin against nalidixic acid- and pefloxacin-susceptible Enterobacteriaceae (n = 668) was higher (MIC50/90 0.06-0.12 mg/L) than previously reported for ofloxacin. As seen with other fluoroquinolones, this activity was reduced against nalidixic acid-resistant and pefloxacin-intermediate and -resistant strains (MIC 1-8 mg/L). MICs for Pseudomonas aeruginosa (n = 104) were between 0.12 and 128 mg/L. Levofloxacin had good activity against nalidixic acid- and pefloxacin-susceptible Acinetobacter baumannii (n = 12; MIC 0.06-0.25 mg/L), but the activity was reduced against nalidixic acid- and pefloxacin-resistant strains (n = 80; MIC 1-32 mg/L). Haemophilus influenzae (n = 70), Haemophilus parainfluenzae (n = 47) and Moraxella catarrhalis (n = 64) were inhibited by low concentrations of levofloxacin (MICs 0.016-0.03 mg/L, 0.03-0.12 mg/L) and 0.03-0.12 mg/L, respectively). Clostridium perfringens (n = 23; MIC 0.25-1 mg/L) was more susceptible than Bacteroides fragilis (n = 60; MIC 0.5-4 mg/L). Levofloxacin showed superior activity compared with ofloxacin against methicillin-susceptible staphylococci (n = 107; MIC 0.03-0.5 mg/L); the resistant strains (MICs 2-32 mg/L) were usually also resistant to methicillin. Levofloxacin was less effective against enterococci (n = 105; MIC 1-32 mg/L), but streptococci (n = 192) and pneumococci (n = 129), including 58 penicillin-non-susceptible strains, were inhibited by low concentrations (MICs 0.5-2 mg/L). According to the regression curve, zone diameters were usually 20-22 mm, 17-19 mm and 15-16 mm for MICs of 1, 2 and 4 mg/L, respectively. In conclusion, this study, performed on a large number of strains, confirms the superior anti-bacterial activity of levofloxacin compared with ofloxacin, especially against pathogens isolated from respiratory tract infections.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10404337     DOI: 10.1093/jac/43.suppl_3.43

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Antimicrob Chemother        ISSN: 0305-7453            Impact factor:   5.790


  6 in total

1.  Relevance of soft-tissue penetration by levofloxacin for target site bacterial killing in patients with sepsis.

Authors:  M A Zeitlinger; P Dehghanyar; B X Mayer; B S Schenk; U Neckel; G Heinz; A Georgopoulos; M Müller; C Joukhadar
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2003-11       Impact factor: 5.191

2.  Invasive Streptococcus pneumoniae in France: antimicrobial resistance, serotype, and molecular epidemiology findings from a monthly national study in 2000 to 2002.

Authors:  Jean-Winoc Decousser; Patrick Pina; Florent Viguier; Franc Picot; Patrice Courvalin; Pierre Allouch
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2004-09       Impact factor: 5.191

3.  Comparative activities of telithromycin (HMR 3647), levofloxacin, and other antimicrobial agents against human mycoplasmas.

Authors:  C M Bebear; H Renaudin; A Bryskier; C Bebear
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2000-07       Impact factor: 5.191

Review 4.  Management of meningitis due to antibiotic-resistant Acinetobacter species.

Authors:  Baek-Nam Kim; Anton Y Peleg; Thomas P Lodise; Jeffrey Lipman; Jian Li; Roger Nation; David L Paterson
Journal:  Lancet Infect Dis       Date:  2009-04       Impact factor: 25.071

Review 5.  Treatment options for multidrug-resistant Acinetobacter species.

Authors:  Jacob Gilad; Yehuda Carmeli
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 9.546

6.  Systemic and local antibiotic prophylaxis in the prevention of Staphylococcus epidermidis graft infection.

Authors:  Huseyin Turgut; Suzan Sacar; Ilknur Kaleli; Mustafa Sacar; Ibrahim Goksin; Semra Toprak; Ali Asan; Nural Cevahir; Koray Tekin; Ahmet Baltalarli
Journal:  BMC Infect Dis       Date:  2005-10-21       Impact factor: 3.090

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.