Literature DB >> 10403200

Mood and spatial memory: emotion and right hemisphere contribution to spatial cognition.

D M Tucker1, A Hartry-Speiser, L McDougal, P Luu, D deGrandpre.   

Abstract

Depressed persons show an impairment of spatial cognition that may reflect the influence of affective arousal on right hemisphere cognition. We examined normal university students to determine whether individual differences in mood and arousal levels would be related to performance on a spatial memory task. Right-hemisphere specialization for this spatial memory task was confirmed by a left field advantage for the targets and this field asymmetry was enhanced as task difficulty was increased. Event-related brain potentials (ERPs), assessed with a 64-channel sensor array, showed a processing negativity contralateral to the target in the P300 interval (300-500 ms after the target appeared). This effect increased as task difficulty was increased. A stronger posterior negativity for good (rather than bad) targets may suggest that attention was allocated toward the good locations. A suggestion of right hemisphere sensitivity to mood in this normal sample was a tendency for the subjects high in Negative Arousal not to show the normal right hemisphere (left field) superiority for the spatial memory task. Interestingly, a medial frontal lobe negativity was elicited in the ERPs by the bad targets, perhaps paralleling the error-related negativity observed in other paradigms. This medial frontal negativity was also seen in response to the feedback stimulus for the bad targets. Motivation may be important to this frontal effect: It was enhanced for subjects describing themselves as high in either positive or negative affective arousal during the task.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10403200     DOI: 10.1016/s0301-0511(99)00005-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biol Psychol        ISSN: 0301-0511            Impact factor:   3.251


  11 in total

1.  Medial frontal cortex in action monitoring.

Authors:  P Luu; T Flaisch; D M Tucker
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2000-01-01       Impact factor: 6.167

2.  Functions of the medial frontal cortex in the processing of conflict and errors.

Authors:  W J Gehring; D E Fencsik
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2001-12-01       Impact factor: 6.167

3.  Affective and cognitive modulation of performance monitoring: behavioral and ERP evidence.

Authors:  Emiliana R Simon-Thomas; Robert T Knight
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2005-09       Impact factor: 3.282

Review 4.  Emotion and pain: a functional cerebral systems integration.

Authors:  Gina A Mollet; David W Harrison
Journal:  Neuropsychol Rev       Date:  2006-09-28       Impact factor: 7.444

5.  Impaired set-shifting and dissociable effects on tests of spatial working memory following the dopamine D2 receptor antagonist sulpiride in human volunteers.

Authors:  Mitul A Mehta; Facundo F Manes; Gianna Magnolfi; Barbara J Sahakian; Trevor W Robbins
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2004-04-28       Impact factor: 4.530

6.  Comparative study of the gamma rhythm in normal conditions, during examination stress, and in patients with first depressive episode.

Authors:  V B Strelets; Zh V Garakh; V Yu Novototskii-Vlasov
Journal:  Neurosci Behav Physiol       Date:  2007-05

7.  Frontolimbic activity and cognitive bias in major depression.

Authors:  Catherine Poulsen; Phan Luu; Stacey M Crane; Jason Quiring; Don M Tucker
Journal:  J Abnorm Psychol       Date:  2009-08

8.  Investigation into local white matter abnormality in emotional processing and sensorimotor areas using an automatically annotated fiber clustering in major depressive disorder.

Authors:  Ye Wu; Fan Zhang; Nikos Makris; Yuping Ning; Isaiah Norton; Shenglin She; Hongjun Peng; Yogesh Rathi; Yuanjing Feng; Huawang Wu; Lauren J O'Donnell
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2018-07-06       Impact factor: 6.556

9.  Pain reduction by inducing sensory-motor adaptation in Complex Regional Pain Syndrome (CRPS PRISMA): protocol for a double-blind randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Monika Halicka; Axel D Vittersø; Michael J Proulx; Janet H Bultitude
Journal:  BMC Neurol       Date:  2020-02-19       Impact factor: 2.474

10.  Different methods to define utility functions yield similar results but engage different neural processes.

Authors:  Marcus Heldmann; Bodo Vogt; Hans-Jochen Heinze; Thomas F Münte
Journal:  Front Behav Neurosci       Date:  2009-10-30       Impact factor: 3.558

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.