Literature DB >> 10402438

Are electrophysiological changes induced by longer lasting atrial fibrillation reversible? :observations using the atrial defibrillator.

L M Rodriguez1, C Timmermans, H J Wellens.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Studies in animal hearts have shown shortening of the atrial effective refractory period (AERP) and loss of the relation between the AERP and heart rate after prolonged periods of atrial fibrillation (AF). The purposes of this study were (1) to evaluate atrial electrophysiology after a long period of sinus rhythm in patients who had longer lasting recurrent AF that was successfully treated with the Metrix Atrioverter and (2) to analyze the effect of prompt cardioversion on subsequent AF episodes and the duration of sinus rhythm. METHODS AND
RESULTS: Four patients with recurrent AF (duration, 3 to 21 years; mean+/-SD, 13+/-7.6 years) were studied after the implantation of an Atrioverter. The Atrioverter stores and analyzes 3 minutes of cardiac rhythm every hour. Before implantation, AERP was measured. During a mean follow-up of 14 months, 52 spontaneous (39 treated and 18 nontreated) AF episodes occurred while the patients were on antiarrhythmic drugs. All patients were electrophysiologically studied after they had been in sinus rhythm for at least 1000 hours (range, 1052 to 2675 hours). Before Atrioverter implantation, AF was induced by 1 atrial premature beat in 3 patients and not induced in the remaining patient. After a long period in sinus rhythm (>1000 hours), AF could be induced in the same 3 patients in the same way as before implantation. In the patient in whom no AF was induced, right AERP values measured using the single extrastimulus technique at 3 pacing cycle lengths (600, 500, and 430 ms) were similar to those before implantation.
CONCLUSIONS: AF was still inducible by a single atrial premature beat after long episodes of sinus rhythm in 3 of 4 patients with previously longer lasting AF. In the patient in whom no AF was induced, AERP behaved like it did before implantation. In these patients with longer lasting recurrent AF, no return to "normal" atrial electrophysiology could be demonstrated.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10402438     DOI: 10.1161/01.cir.100.2.113

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Circulation        ISSN: 0009-7322            Impact factor:   29.690


  4 in total

Review 1.  Atrial fibrillation: classification, pathophysiology, mechanisms and drug treatment.

Authors:  Vias Markides; Richard J Schilling
Journal:  Heart       Date:  2003-08       Impact factor: 5.994

Review 2.  Atrial fibrillation: review of current treatment strategies.

Authors:  Joshua Xu; Jessica G Y Luc; Kevin Phan
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2016-09       Impact factor: 2.895

Review 3.  Evolving concepts in the treatment of atrial fibrillation.

Authors:  Parimal B Maniar; Jonathan S Steinberg
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rep       Date:  2003-09       Impact factor: 2.931

Review 4.  Rate Control Strategy Elevated To Primary Treatment For Atrial Fibrillation: Has The Last Word Already Been Spoken?

Authors:  Osmar Antonio Centurión; Akihiko Shimizu
Journal:  J Atr Fibrillation       Date:  2014-12-31
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.