Literature DB >> 10402104

The polar average reference effect: a bias in estimating the head surface integral in EEG recording.

M Junghöfer1, T Elbert, D M Tucker, C Braun.   

Abstract

A reference-independent measure of potential is helpful for studying the multichannel EEG. The potentials integrated over the surface of the body is a constant, i.e. inactive across time, regardless of the activity and distribution of brain electric sources. Therefore, the average reference, the mean of all recording channels at each time point, may be used to approximate an inactive reference. However, this approximation is valid only with accurate spatial sampling of the scalp fields. Accurate sampling requires a sufficient electrode density and full coverage of the head's surface. If electrodes are concentrated in one region of the surface, such as just on the scalp, then the average is biased toward that region. Differences from the average will then be smaller in the center of the region, e.g. the vertex, than at the periphery. In this paper, we illustrate how this polar average reference effect (PARE) may be created by both the inadequate density and the uneven distribution of EEG electrodes. The greater the coverage of the surface of the volume conductor, the more the average reference approaches the ideal inactive reference.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10402104     DOI: 10.1016/s1388-2457(99)00044-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Neurophysiol        ISSN: 1388-2457            Impact factor:   3.708


  80 in total

1.  Investigating the generators of the scalp recorded visuo-verbal P300 using cortically constrained source localization.

Authors:  Kathryn A Moores; C Richard Clark; Jo L M Hadfield; Greg C Brown; D James Taylor; Sean P Fitzgibbon; Andrew C Lewis; Darren L Weber; Richard Greenblatt
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2003-01       Impact factor: 5.038

2.  Emotional reactivity, regulation and childhood stuttering: a behavioral and electrophysiological study.

Authors:  Hayley S Arnold; Edward G Conture; Alexandra P F Key; Tedra Walden
Journal:  J Commun Disord       Date:  2010-12-24       Impact factor: 2.288

3.  Differentiating amodal familiarity from modality-specific memory processes: an ERP study.

Authors:  Tim Curran; Joseph Dien
Journal:  Psychophysiology       Date:  2003-11       Impact factor: 4.016

4.  Threat as a feature in visual semantic object memory.

Authors:  Clifford S Calley; Michael A Motes; H-Sheng Chiang; Virginia Buhl; Jeffrey S Spence; Hervé Abdi; Raksha Anand; Mandy Maguire; Leonardo Estevez; Richard Briggs; Thomas Freeman; Michael A Kraut; John Hart
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2012-03-25       Impact factor: 5.038

5.  What's in a name? Brain activity reveals categorization processes differ across languages.

Authors:  Chao Liu; Twila Tardif; Xiaoqin Mai; William J Gehring; Nina Simms; Yue-Jia Luo
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2010-11       Impact factor: 5.038

6.  An early electrophysiological response associated with expertise in letter perception.

Authors:  Alan C N Wong; Isabel Gauthier; Brion Woroch; Casey DeBuse; Tim Curran
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2005-09       Impact factor: 3.282

7.  Children's shyness and neural responses to social exclusion: Patterns of midfrontal theta power usually not observed until adolescence.

Authors:  Alva Tang; Ayelet Lahat; Michael J Crowley; Jia Wu; Louis A Schmidt
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2021-06-05       Impact factor: 3.282

8.  Beauty is in the ease of the beholding: a neurophysiological test of the averageness theory of facial attractiveness.

Authors:  Logan T Trujillo; Jessica M Jankowitsch; Judith H Langlois
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2014-09       Impact factor: 3.282

9.  A developmental study of the feedback-related negativity from 10-17 years: age and sex effects for reward versus non-reward.

Authors:  Michael J Crowley; Jia Wu; Rebecca E Hommer; Mikle South; Peter J Molfese; R M P Fearon; Linda C Mayes
Journal:  Dev Neuropsychol       Date:  2013       Impact factor: 2.253

10.  The influence of perceptual and semantic categorization on inhibitory processing as measured by the N2-P3 response.

Authors:  Mandy J Maguire; Matthew R Brier; Patricia S Moore; Thomas C Ferree; Dylan Ray; Stewart Mostofsky; John Hart; Michael A Kraut
Journal:  Brain Cogn       Date:  2009-09-20       Impact factor: 2.310

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.