Literature DB >> 10400352

Abdominal muscles contribute in a minor way to peak spinal compression in lifting.

M P de Looze1, H Groen, H Horemans, I Kingma, J H van Dieën.   

Abstract

In lifting, the abdominal muscles are thought to be activated to stabilize the spine. As a detrimental effect, they contribute to spinal compression. The existing literature is not conclusive about the biological relevance of this effect. From biological, mechanical and anatomical considerations it was hypothesised that the relative abdominal contribution to compression would be minor in the beginning of the lift, that the relative and absolute abdominal contribution to compression would rise throughout the lift, and that the obliques would contribute to a larger extent than the rectus abdominis. To investigate these hypotheses, 10 subjects lifted 0.5, 10.5 and 22.5 kg. EMG levels obtained from the rectus abdominis and the obliques were converted into force using normalized EMG, muscle potential and area values, and modulating factors for muscle length and contraction velocity. An anatomical model was applied to compute the abdominal effects on spinal compression in three consecutive phases within a lift. If expressed relative to the total spinal compression, the abdominal contribution for the three weight conditions was 7.1% (SD, 1.7), 10.4% (4.7) and 12.5% (4.4) in the begin and 21.0% (5.8), 19.0% (5.3) and 22.2% (6.6) in the end phase. Thus, the relative abdominal contribution to compression was minor in the beginning and increased towards the end. The absolute abdominal contribution was constant throughout the lift. The contributions could be retraced to the obliques rather than the rectus, while during the lift a shift in activation from the obliquus externus to internus was observed.

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10400352     DOI: 10.1016/s0021-9290(99)00061-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Biomech        ISSN: 0021-9290            Impact factor:   2.712


  7 in total

1.  Role of intra-abdominal pressure in the unloading and stabilization of the human spine during static lifting tasks.

Authors:  N Arjmand; A Shirazi-Adl
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2005-12-07       Impact factor: 3.134

2.  The role of back muscle endurance, maximum force, balance and trunk rotation control regarding lifting capacity.

Authors:  Peter Schenk; Andreas Klipstein; Susanne Spillmann; Jesper Strøyer; Thomas Laubli
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2004-11-20       Impact factor: 3.078

3.  Abdominal muscle activation increases lumbar spinal stability: analysis of contributions of different muscle groups.

Authors:  Ian A F Stokes; Mack G Gardner-Morse; Sharon M Henry
Journal:  Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon)       Date:  2011-05-14       Impact factor: 2.063

4.  Intra-abdominal pressure and abdominal wall muscular function: Spinal unloading mechanism.

Authors:  Ian A F Stokes; Mack G Gardner-Morse; Sharon M Henry
Journal:  Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon)       Date:  2010-07-23       Impact factor: 2.063

5.  Architectural analysis of human abdominal wall muscles: implications for mechanical function.

Authors:  Stephen H M Brown; Samuel R Ward; Mark S Cook; Richard L Lieber
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2011-03-01       Impact factor: 3.468

6.  Effects of fatigue on trunk stability in elite gymnasts.

Authors:  Jaap H van Dieën; Tessy Luger; Jeroen van der Eb
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2011-07-23       Impact factor: 3.078

7.  A 10-Week Program of Combined Hippotherapy and Scroth's Exercises Improves Balance and Postural Asymmetries in Adolescence Idiopathic Scoliosis: A Randomized Controlled Study.

Authors:  Amr A Abdel-Aziem; Osama R Abdelraouf; Shahesta A Ghally; Haytham A Dahlawi; Rafik E Radwan
Journal:  Children (Basel)       Date:  2021-12-30
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.