Literature DB >> 10400010

Comparison of dual-chamber pacing versus septal myectomy for the treatment of patients with hypertrophic obstructive cardiomyopathy: a comparison of objective hemodynamic and exercise end points.

S R Ommen1, R A Nishimura, R W Squires, H V Schaff, G K Danielson, A J Tajik.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study was to compare the treatment effects of septal myectomy with dual-chamber pacing in patients with hypertrophic obstructive cardiomyopathy (HOCM).
BACKGROUND: The optimal treatment for symptomatic patients with drug-refractory HOCM is unknown. Both dual-chamber pacing and surgical myectomy may result in subjective symptom improvement. However, no direct comparisons with objective end points have been reported.
METHODS: Thirty-nine patients with symptomatic HOCM were analyzed in this concurrent cohort study. Twenty patients underwent surgical myectomy, and 19 received dual-chamber pacemakers based on patient preference. These patients had prospective baseline and follow-up evaluations including physician assessment, echocardiography and standardized metabolic treadmill exercise testing.
RESULTS: Baseline symptom status, left ventricular outflow tract gradients, exercise times and maximal oxygen consumption peak were similar between the two groups. Left ventricular outflow gradient was reduced from 76+/-57 to 9+/-17 mm Hg (p = 0.0001) after myectomy, and from 77+/-61 to 55+/-39 mm Hg (p = 0.07) after pacing (p = 0.02 for comparison with myectomy). Ninety percent of myectomy patients experienced symptomatic improvement as compared with 47% in the pacing group. Exercise duration increased significantly from 6.6+/-2.8 to 8.7+/-3.0 min (p = 0.0003) after myectomy compared with a change from 6.4+/-2.1 to 7.0+/-2.2 min (p = NS) in the pacing group. Maximal oxygen consumption increased from 19.4+/-6.4 to 22.2+/-6.5 ml/kg/min after myectomy (p = 0.004), whereas the pacing group did not experience any significant change (19.6+/-6.5 vs. 20.1+/-6.5 ml/kg/min, p = NS).
CONCLUSIONS: Surgical myectomy and dual-chamber pacing improve subjective measures of functional status in patients with symptomatic HOCM. In this nonrandomized study, myectomy offered greater reduction in left ventricular outflow tract gradients and larger improvements in objective measures of patient symptoms and functional status when compared with dual-chamber pacing.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10400010     DOI: 10.1016/s0735-1097(99)00173-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol        ISSN: 0735-1097            Impact factor:   24.094


  10 in total

1.  [Transcoronary ablation of septal hypertrophy (TASH): supersedes it the surgery (myectomy)?].

Authors:  H Kuhn; F Gietzen
Journal:  Herz       Date:  1999-12       Impact factor: 1.443

Review 2.  Analysis of dual-chamber pacing as a treatment for refractory limiting symptoms in patients with obstructive hypertrophic cardiomyopathy.

Authors:  B J Maron
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rep       Date:  2000-03       Impact factor: 2.931

Review 3.  Emerging indications for permanent pacing.

Authors:  D L Wolbrette; G V Naccarelli
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rep       Date:  2000-07       Impact factor: 2.931

4.  Unmasking the truth.

Authors:  D Cullington; S Esmail; S Hurren; J G F Cleland; A L Clark; M F Alamgir
Journal:  BMJ Case Rep       Date:  2011-01-12

Review 5.  Pacing for drug-refractory or drug-intolerant hypertrophic cardiomyopathy.

Authors:  Mohammed Qintar; Abdulrahman Morad; Hazem Alhawasli; Khaled Shorbaji; Belal Firwana; Adib Essali; Waleed Kadro
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2012-05-16

Review 6.  Contemporary treatment of hypertrophic cardiomyopathy.

Authors:  Ali J Marian
Journal:  Tex Heart Inst J       Date:  2009

Review 7.  Review of Contemporary Invasive Treatment Approaches and Critical Appraisal of Guidelines on Hypertrophic Obstructive Cardiomyopathy: State-of-the-Art Review.

Authors:  Steven Lebowitz; Mariusz Kowalewski; Giuseppe Maria Raffa; Danny Chu; Matteo Greco; Caterina Gandolfo; Carmelo Mignosa; Roberto Lorusso; Piotr Suwalski; Michele Pilato
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2022-06-14       Impact factor: 4.964

8.  Biventricular / left ventricular pacing in hypertrophic obstructive cardiomyopathy: an overview.

Authors:  Radu Vatasescu; Reinder Evertz; Lluis Mont; Marta Sitges; Josep Brugada; Antonio Berruezo
Journal:  Indian Pacing Electrophysiol J       Date:  2012-05-20

9.  Comparison of long-term effect of dual-chamber pacing and alcohol septal ablation in patients with hypertrophic obstructive cardiomyopathy.

Authors:  Jan Krejci; Pavel Gregor; David Zemanek; Klaudia Vyskocilova; Karol Curila; Radka Stepanova; Miroslav Novak; Ladislav Groch; Josef Veselka
Journal:  ScientificWorldJournal       Date:  2013-11-11

10.  Short atrioventricular delay pacing therapy in young and old patients with hypertrophic obstructive cardiomyopathy: good long-term results and a low need for reinterventions.

Authors:  Davood Javidgonbadi; Nils-Johan Abdon; Bert Andersson; Maria Schaufelberger; Ingegerd Östman-Smith
Journal:  Europace       Date:  2018-10-01       Impact factor: 5.214

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.