Literature DB >> 10399976

Endoscopic ultrasound for diagnosis and staging of pancreatic tumors.

J L Harrison1, K W Millikan, R A Prinz, S Zaidi.   

Abstract

Endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) is proving to be a useful tool for evaluation of clinically suspected pancreatic masses unsatisfactorily evaluated by other means of imaging. We reviewed the records of 19 patients who had CT and EUS performed for clinically suspected pancreatic masses. Each patient had subsequent surgical exploration. Nineteen patients (11 females and 8 males) presenting with symptoms (11 with obstructive jaundice, 6 with abdominal pain and weight loss) or incidental CT findings suspicious for pancreatic carcinoma underwent EUS for further pancreatic evaluation. All of these patients had exploratory laparotomies, with 13 pancreaticoduodenectomies, 3 distal pancreatectomies and splenectomies, 1 bypass procedure, 1 open pancreatic and hepatic biopsy showing metastatic disease, and 1 open exploration with negative fine-needle aspiration biopsy. EUS correctly identified pancreatic neoplasms in 17 of 19 cases, with two false positives. The tumors included 15 adenocarcinomas, 1 microcystic adenoma, and 1 lymphoma. Node status was correctly predicted in 9 of 12 specimens. Nine of 12 tumors had accurate tumor staging by EUS. Absence of vascular invasion was accurately predicted in 13 of 14 cases. Two patients had metastatic disease discovered at laparotomy. All 19 patients had preoperative abdominal CT scans, with six of these negative for pancreatic masses. EUS is more sensitive than CT in detecting pancreatic masses and is more accurate than CT in locally staging pancreatic tumors. This higher sensitivity is important because those patients with earlier stage tumors are the most likely to benefit from resection.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10399976     DOI: 10.1016/s0016-5085(98)85653-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am Surg        ISSN: 0003-1348            Impact factor:   0.688


  6 in total

1.  Suprapancreatic and periportal lymph nodes are normally larger than 1 cm by laparoscopic ultrasound evaluation.

Authors:  A J Koler; M C Lilly; M E Arregui
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2004-03-19       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 2.  Diagnostic accuracy of different imaging modalities following computed tomography (CT) scanning for assessing the resectability with curative intent in pancreatic and periampullary cancer.

Authors:  Domenico Tamburrino; Deniece Riviere; Mohammad Yaghoobi; Brian R Davidson; Kurinchi Selvan Gurusamy
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2016-09-15

3.  Performance characteristics of endoscopic ultrasound in the staging of pancreatic cancer: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Haq Nawaz; Chen Yi Fan; John Kloke; Asif Khalid; Kevin McGrath; Douglas Landsittel; Georgios I Papachristou
Journal:  JOP       Date:  2013-09-10

Review 4.  Imaging modalities for characterising focal pancreatic lesions.

Authors:  Lawrence Mj Best; Vishal Rawji; Stephen P Pereira; Brian R Davidson; Kurinchi Selvan Gurusamy
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2017-04-17

5.  A patient with chronic hepatitis C and a pancreatic mass in endoscopic ultrasound.

Authors:  Mehdi Ghobakhlou; Amir Houshang Mohammad Alizadeh; Nosratollah Naderi; Shirin Haghighi; Mahsa Molaei; Mitra Rafiezadeh; Mohammad Reza Zali
Journal:  Case Rep Gastroenterol       Date:  2012-06-19

Review 6.  Endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) and the management of pancreatic cancer.

Authors:  Muhammad Nadeem Yousaf; Fizah S Chaudhary; Amrat Ehsan; Alejandro L Suarez; Thiruvengadam Muniraj; Priya Jamidar; Harry R Aslanian; James J Farrell
Journal:  BMJ Open Gastroenterol       Date:  2020-05
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.