PURPOSE: To compare the venous irritation, pharmacokinetics, and tissue distribution of tirilazad in rats after intravenous administration of a submicron lipid emulsion with that of an aqueous solution. METHODS: Venous irritation was determined by microscopic evaluation of injury to the lateral tail veins of rats. Pharmacokinetic parameters were determined by following plasma concentrations of drug. Tissue distribution of [14C]-tirilazad was determined by quantitative whole body autoradiography. RESULTS: Single dose injections of tirilazad as an emulsion at doses ranging from 1.52 mg to 13.5 mg were non-irritating whereas the solution was irritating at a dose of 1.3 mg. The pharmacokinetic parameters were not statistically different between the emulsion and the solution (p > 0.2) at doses of 6 mg/kg/day and 20 mg/kg/day. However, at 65 mg/kg/day dose, a higher AUC(0,6) (4-fold) and lower V(ss), (18-fold) and CL(5-fold) were observed for the lipid emulsion as compared to the solution (p < 0.05). Tissue distribution showed higher initial concentrations (two fold or more) in most tissues for the solution. These values, however, equilibrated by 4 h and AUC(0,4) differences were less than two fold in most tissues. CONCLUSIONS: Formulating tirilazad in the lipid emulsion significantly reduces the venous irritation without changing the pharmacokinetics and tissue distribution at low doses.
PURPOSE: To compare the venous irritation, pharmacokinetics, and tissue distribution of tirilazad in rats after intravenous administration of a submicron lipid emulsion with that of an aqueous solution. METHODS:Venous irritation was determined by microscopic evaluation of injury to the lateral tail veins of rats. Pharmacokinetic parameters were determined by following plasma concentrations of drug. Tissue distribution of [14C]-tirilazad was determined by quantitative whole body autoradiography. RESULTS: Single dose injections of tirilazad as an emulsion at doses ranging from 1.52 mg to 13.5 mg were non-irritating whereas the solution was irritating at a dose of 1.3 mg. The pharmacokinetic parameters were not statistically different between the emulsion and the solution (p > 0.2) at doses of 6 mg/kg/day and 20 mg/kg/day. However, at 65 mg/kg/day dose, a higher AUC(0,6) (4-fold) and lower V(ss), (18-fold) and CL(5-fold) were observed for the lipid emulsion as compared to the solution (p < 0.05). Tissue distribution showed higher initial concentrations (two fold or more) in most tissues for the solution. These values, however, equilibrated by 4 h and AUC(0,4) differences were less than two fold in most tissues. CONCLUSIONS: Formulating tirilazad in the lipid emulsion significantly reduces the venous irritation without changing the pharmacokinetics and tissue distribution at low doses.
Authors: J M Braughler; P S Burton; R L Chase; J F Pregenzer; E J Jacobsen; F J VanDoornik; J M Tustin; D E Ayer; G L Bundy Journal: Biochem Pharmacol Date: 1988-10-15 Impact factor: 5.858