Literature DB >> 10397434

Endoscopic harvesting of the greater saphenous vein for aortocoronary bypass grafting.

G J Carrizo1, J J Livesay, L Luy.   

Abstract

We conducted an observational study to evaluate the effectiveness of an endoscopic technique for harvesting the greater saphenous vein for aortocoronary bypass grafting. We hypothesized that the endoscopic technique would minimize the risk of postoperative wound complications. From May 1997 to July 1998, we used an endoscopic technique to harvest the greater saphenous vein in 50 patients who underwent aortocoronary artery bypass grafting. Twenty-five of the patients had an increased risk for wound complications due to preexisting diabetes, obesity, peripheral vascular disease, or lymphedema. The average duration of the procedure was 39 minutes (range, 11 to 70 minutes). The average length of the harvested vein was 58 cm (range, 25 to 85 cm). We made an average of 2.5 incisions per patient (range, 1 to 5 incisions), and the average incision length was 7 cm (range, 3 to 10 cm). Two patients (4%) required conversion to an open technique using 5 small incisions. Postoperative complications included 1 wound infection (2%) and 1 small hematoma (2%). Two patients (4%) had minor erythema at the incision site, and 5 patients (10%) had postoperative lymphedema. The most common problem, ecchymosis, was seen in 6 patients (12%). None required repeat hospitalization or reoperation for wound complications. In our study, the endoscopic approach yielded superior cosmetic results, and reduced wound complications and discomfort, compared with traditional methods of vein harvesting. After gaining expertise with this minimally invasive method of vein harvesting, a surgeon can safely remove the saphenous vein in 20 to 30 minutes.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10397434      PMCID: PMC325615     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Tex Heart Inst J        ISSN: 0730-2347


  9 in total

1.  Endoscopic versus traditional saphenous vein harvesting: a prospective, randomized trial.

Authors:  K B Allen; G L Griffith; D A Heimansohn; R J Robison; R G Matheny; J J Schier; E B Fitzgerald; C J Shaar
Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg       Date:  1998-07       Impact factor: 4.330

2.  Endoscopic saphenous vein harvesting: minimally invasive video-assisted saphenectomy.

Authors:  D G Cable; J A Dearani
Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg       Date:  1997-10       Impact factor: 4.330

3.  Minimally invasive harvest of the saphenous vein for coronary artery bypass grafting.

Authors:  H T Tevaearai; X M Mueller; L K von Segesser
Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg       Date:  1997-06       Impact factor: 4.330

4.  Subcutaneous, video-assisted saphenous vein harvest: report of the first 30 cases.

Authors:  A B Lumsden; F F Eaves; J C Ofenloch; W D Jordan
Journal:  Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  1996-12

5.  Complications of saphenous vein harvesting following coronary artery bypass surgery.

Authors:  J Lavee; J Schneiderman; S Yorav; M Shewach-Millet; R Adar
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Surg (Torino)       Date:  1989 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 1.888

6.  Preoperative correlates of impaired wound healing after saphenous vein excision.

Authors:  J R Utley; M E Thomason; D J Wallace; D W Mutch; L Staton; V Brown; C M Wilde; M S Bell
Journal:  J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  1989-07       Impact factor: 5.209

7.  Endoscopic saphenous vein harvesting.

Authors:  K B Allen; C J Shaar
Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg       Date:  1997-07       Impact factor: 4.330

8.  Clinical experience with the video-assisted saphenectomy procedure for coronary bypass operations.

Authors:  S Pagni; E A Ulfe; W D Montgomery; D J VanHimbergen; D J Fisher; L A Gray; P A Spence
Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg       Date:  1998-11       Impact factor: 4.330

9.  Leg wound complications associated with coronary revascularization.

Authors:  G A DeLaria; J A Hunter; M D Goldin; C Serry; H Javid; H Najafi
Journal:  J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  1981-03       Impact factor: 5.209

  9 in total
  3 in total

1.  The transition from open to endoscopic saphenous vein harvesting and its clinical impact: The Texas Heart Institute experience.

Authors:  Tianjie Lai; Yarrow Babb; Qian Ning; Luz Reyes; Thanh Dao; Vei-Vei Lee; Laurie Mitchell; Layne O Gentry; Ross M Reul; David A Ott
Journal:  Tex Heart Inst J       Date:  2006

2.  Unilayer Closure of Saphenous Vein Incision Lines is Better than Bilayer Closure.

Authors:  Osman Tiryakioglu; Tugrul Goncu; Gunduz Yumun; Onder Bozkurt; Ahmet Demir; Selma Kenar Tiryakioglu; Ahmet Ozyazicioglu; Senol Yavuz
Journal:  Open Cardiovasc Med J       Date:  2010-12-10

Review 3.  Endoscopic vein harvesting.

Authors:  Enoch Akowuah; Daniel Burns; Joseph Zacharias; Bilal H Kirmani
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2021-03       Impact factor: 2.895

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.