Literature DB >> 10397229

How to use the results of an economic evaluation.

D K Heyland1, A Gafni, P Kernerman, S Keenan, D Chalfin.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Given the high costs of delivering care to critically ill patients, practitioners and policymakers are beginning to scrutinize the costs and outcomes associated with intensive care. Health economics is a discipline concerned with determining the best way of using resources to maximize the health of the community. This involves addressing questions such as which procedure, test, therapy, or program should be provided, and to whom, given available resources.
PURPOSE: The purpose of this article is to review general economic principles that will help intensivists to better interpret published economic evaluations. DATA SOURCES: Selected articles from the health economics and critical care literature.
RESULTS: In this article, we use an economic evaluation that examines sedation strategies in critically ill patients. We discuss how learning to critically appraise an economic evaluation is only part of the task for end users. Determining whether and how to apply the results of economic evaluations to local settings presents bigger challenges and remains largely a matter of judgment.
CONCLUSIONS: Economic evaluations use analytic techniques to systematically consider all possible costs and consequences of clinical actions. Although they should never form the sole basis for clinical decisions for individual patients, economic evaluations offer potentially useful information at different levels of decision-making.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10397229     DOI: 10.1097/00003246-199906000-00052

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Crit Care Med        ISSN: 0090-3493            Impact factor:   7.598


  5 in total

Review 1.  Intensive care--a cost effective option for developing countries?

Authors:  R C Sachdeva
Journal:  Indian J Pediatr       Date:  2001-04       Impact factor: 1.967

2.  Variable costs of ICU patients: a multicenter prospective study.

Authors:  Carlotta Rossi; Bruno Simini; Luca Brazzi; Giancarlo Rossi; Danilo Radrizzani; Gaetano Iapichino; Guido Bertolini
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2006-02-25       Impact factor: 17.440

3.  The role of economic evaluation in the decision-making process of family physicians: design and methods of a qualitative embedded multiple-case study.

Authors:  Chantale Lessard; André-Pierre Contandriopoulos; Marie-Dominique Beaulieu
Journal:  BMC Fam Pract       Date:  2009-02-11       Impact factor: 2.497

Review 4.  The prevalence, cost implications, and management of sleep disorders: an overview.

Authors:  Jamil L Hossain; Colin M Shapiro
Journal:  Sleep Breath       Date:  2002-06       Impact factor: 2.816

5.  The use of extracorporeal carbon dioxide removal to avoid intubation in patients failing non-invasive ventilation--a cost analysis.

Authors:  Stephan Braune; Hilmar Burchardi; Markus Engel; Axel Nierhaus; Henning Ebelt; Maria Metschke; Simone Rosseau; Stefan Kluge
Journal:  BMC Anesthesiol       Date:  2015-11-04       Impact factor: 2.217

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.